Analyzing the Newtown Narrative: Sandy Hook’s Disappearing Shooter Suspects 51

It is now beyond question that the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr. all involved patsies, additional gunman and perhaps most importantly, mass media complicity to achieve their political ends. Along these lines and in a fashion now characteristic of how such public executions are framed, the observations and analyses of citizen journalists and alternative media suggest how coverage of the Newtown Connecticut school shooting was substantially altered in the several hours and days following the event.

After the 1995 Murrah Federal Building bombing central elements that would help the citizenry make sense of the event, such as unexploded ordnance found in the structure and Timothy McVeigh’s accomplice, were stricken from the official narrative. Along these lines at the probable behest of government authorities a second gunman accompanying Jared Lee Loughner in 2011 was quickly tossed down the memory hole by news outlets covering the incident. Similar reportorial lapses took place at the Aurora Colorado massacre last July where eyewitnesses attested to spotting James Holmes’ collaborators (or handlers) inside the theater.

When the news media act as willing partners in such acts the public becomes an unwitting accessory in its own psychic imprisonment, lulled into the notion that fair play still exists and public servants remain intent on service.

“One of the most important red flags of a staged shooting is a second gunman,” health science and investigative writer Mike Adams observes,

indicating the shooting was coordinated and planned. There are often mind control elements at work in many of these shootings … James Holmes, for example, was a graduate student actually working on mind control technologies funded by the U.S. government. There were also chemical mind control elements linked to Jared Lee Loughner.[1]

Emerging Contradictions

Several independent researchers and most recently Infowars.com reporter Rob Dew have over the past few days pointed to evidence strongly suggesting how two additional Sandy Hook shooting suspects were apprehended by police in the minutes following 9:35AM when officers were dispatched to the elementary school.[2]

Recordings of the 911 dispatcher and first responders to the campus all but wholly corroborate initial reports of at least two persons attempting to flee from the scene, with audio evidence of law enforcement officers actually encountering the suspected assailants at around 9:40AM. Excerpts were replayed on Fox News the evening of December 14.

Dispatcher: All units: The individual that I have on the phone is continuing to hear what he believes to be gunfire.
Dispatcher: All units are responding to Sandy Hook School at this time. The shooting appears to have stopped. It is silent at this time. The school is in lockdown.
Dispatcher: I have reports that the teacher saw two shadows running past the building, past the gym, which would be rear ([inaudible] … to the shooting.
Officer: Yeah. We’ve got him … [Voice quickening] They’re coming at me [inaudible] … down the left side.[3]

In the above encounter one suspect is apparently detained by police outside the school and subsequently referenced in an Associated Press interview with a Sandy Hook student who briefly sees the detained man while being evacuated from the school building.

Unidentified student: And then the police like were knocking on the door, and they’re like, “We’re evacuating people! We’re evacuating people!” So we ran out. There’s police about at every door. They’re leading us, “Down this way. Down this way. Quick! Quick! Come on!” Then we ran down to the firehouse. There’s a man pinned down to the ground with handcuffs on. And we thought that was the victim [sic]. We really didn’t get a good glance at him because there was a car blocking it. Plus we were running really quick.[4]

Accompanying aerial footage depicts officers pursuing another suspected shooter in a wooded area outside the aforementioned gym and behind school grounds. They apprehend him and he is seen prone and surrounded by police before being escorted in front of students’ parents to a squad car, an episode recounted by one anonymous bystander interviewed on a local CBS affiliate.

Unidentified Witness: They did walk a guy out of the woods. I saw them walk a guy out earlier with handcuffs. He walked by us and said he didn’t do it.
Reporter: It was a grown man?
Witness: A grown man. Yeah, he’s sittin’ in the front of the police car over there now. So, I mean—
Reporter: He didn’t have a gun?
Witness: No, I didn’t see any gun. [They] just had him handcuffed and he walked by us and looked into the parents eyes and said, “I didn’t do it.”
Reporter: How was he dressed?
Witness: Ah, camo pants with a dark jacket.[5]

Sandy Hook Official Narrative

Such information was carefully expurgated from the official narrative presented by corporate media within hours of the massacre, a storyline Americans are now painfully familiar with. Here the 20 year-old Adam Lanza is depicted front and center as the chief culprit of the killing spree. Predictably there is not the slightest reference of additional suspects in ABC News’ representative “timeline” example below.

Reporter Don Harris: 9:40AM: Reports of gunfire at Sandy Hook Elementary
Police Dispatch: “Sandy Hook School. Caller is indicating that she thinks someone is shooting in the building.”
Harris: Police say 20 year old Adam Lanza, seen here as a teenager, wore a bulletproof vest and was carrying at least three semi-automatic weapons, including a rifle.
Alexis Wasik, 8 year old: “Everybody was a little scared crying and I felt, actually, a little sick.”
Harris: Within five to ten minutes the first SWAT teams arrived.
Police Officer: “I need units in the school. I got bodies here.”
Harris: Officers helped to lead several hundred students to a nearby fire station.
[By this time Connecticut law enforcement had apprehended the additional two shootings suspects.]
Ben Paley [student]: “When the policemen came in to get us he told us to close our eyes and—like on the picture on the news—do this [demonstrates hands-on-shoulder position with other child] and run.”
Harris: At 10:30AM President Obama was briefed on the situation while police discovered a second crime scene. The shooter’s mother, Nancy Lanza, who authorities believed may have worked at Sandy Hook at some point, was found dead. Police say Adam Lanza shot her before he stormed the school.[6]

Empowering Myths and Media Manipulation

As the lessons of 9/11 impart, when public knowledge of such horrific events is so woefully deficient the nation’s recollections become the fodder for empowering myths dangerously removed from reality. Devoid of information and effective means for political expression the masses are cajoled to exercise faith and hope in empty promises and a system providing the semblance of empathy, hope and change. Under such circumstances violent calamity, appropriately propagandized by mass media, often provides ample public distraction for decisive political maneuvering.

Journalists capable of exercising a modest degree of autonomy and personal insight would have clearly recognized such leads, thereby extending them to a more rigorous examination of law enforcement spokespersons and the broader Newtown community. Instead, the news media once again wholly abdicated any such responsibility to serve the public by unquestioningly parroting official pronouncements and carefully instructing their audiences on exactly how to interpret the event.

“The anchors are the priests at the funeral before the funeral happens,” journalist Jon Rappoport notes. “They set the stage. They convey to the public the meaning and atmosphere and essence of the whole event. And having done that, there is simply no room for anything that would intrude on this sepulchral mood.”[7]

Behind the meticulously crafted façade a deep vagueness and sorrow remains that cannot be wholly explained away by the made-for-television storyline of an awkward and lagging young man who inexplicably murders his mother, destroys his computer hard drive, gains access to a supposedly high security facility and proficiently executes 26 individuals within minutes. Yet only in an age of almost universal deceit is the public asked to accept such without further inquiry and comment. All the while amidst mass grieving political leaders and public figures showboat their legislative priorities. It is difficult to imagine a more profound marker of an utterly decrepit politics and civil society than the shallow and unquestioning media that churns out a monochromatic worldview while giving adherents the insidious impression of being informed.

Notes


[2] Rob Dew, “Evidence of 2nd and 3rd Shooter at Sandy Hook,” Infowars Nightly News, December 18, 2012,  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nCFHImNeRw. A more detailed yet less polished analysis was developed by citizen journalist Idahopicker, “Sandy Hook Elem: 3 Shooters,” December 16, 2012.

[3] Fox News, “911 Call Dispatch Audio Reveals Police Response to Sandy Hook School Shooting,” December 14, 2012, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16AfZXH33eQ

[4] Associated Press, “Raw: Student Describes Scene at School Shooting,” December 14, 2012, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orGjK5q6vGc

[5] CBS News, “Sandy Hook Elem: Two or More Shooters,” December 14, 2012, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhwm6z3PQWU

[6] ABC News, “Newtown Connecticut Shooting: Timeline of Events at Sandy Hook Elementary,” December 15, 2012, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8GINzldb-Y

[7] Jon Rappoport, “Lanza, Bloomberg, Obama, Guns, Psychiatric Meds, and Mass Hypnosis: The TV Script,” JonRappoport.Wordpress.com, December 15, 2012.

Republished at GlobalResearch.ca on December 20, 2012.

About these ads

51 comments

  1. I had trouble with your first sentence: “It is now beyond question that the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr. all involved patsies, additional gunman…” They might have, but it is not beyond question, it is not certain. I used to think so, but certain means absolutely, and nothing is absolute except abstract tautology (e.g., mathematics), which we create in the first place.

    • the kennedy assassination has so many holes in it that it is more of a fantasy to think it was just one person. same with mlk. when people try to argue or deny some of these great conspiracies through history, it is usually cause they never read anything about them and are just denying it, or they’ve read little or they’ve just read stuff from sites DEBUNKING the conspiracies. there are hard truths out there concerning these events. no one knows the absolute who did it, just that it didn’t happen the way we were told it was. phd? you should pursue the facts and all parts concerning these events in history (the book crossfire) before you just deny stuff cause it leads to uncomfortable places. the people that run the world don’t care about the people below them, we are merely cogs meant to work and buy things, then die.

  2. I am having trouble seeing were you actually offer proof of a conspiracy. Will you please expand on your theories more so that the public may better understand. To me your thinking tells me that you feel that somehow the world and everything that happens in it should be perfect. What concerns me most is that you have control over your students thinking processes and world views and I believe that you should address this also. Speculation has no place in academia or journalism.

    • well greg, you need to learn to spell first. (were) should be where. I hope you go back to school and learn how to spell. I doubt you know how to read. Therefore, you probably do not have a valid comment.

  3. Pingback: SANDY HOOK: UNANSWERED QUESTIONS AND MISSING INFORMATION | NO LIES RADIO

  4. http://www.facebook.com/FireJamesTracy

    James Tracy, you have no business teaching at any sort of institution of higher education. You make up conspiracy theories to get attention and I’m going to give you the attention you want. It’s time for you to be removed from FAU. To even begin to suggest that some of these families who lost their loved ones in this tragedy are “crisis actors” is sick.

    • jesse, you are again violating his first amendment right of freedom of speech. Oh ya, do you have evidence that this happened? Oh I doubt it, because no evidence is given. James tracy is a very intelligent person. Please go back to the sheep and let your fellow sheep know that you are lost and are glad to be home

  5. Pingback: The Sandy Hook School Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information - Illinois Tactical Blog

  6. Pingback: Sandy Hook’s Disappearing Shooter Suspects: MemoryHoleBlog.com « The American Resolution

  7. It happened. My sister is an eye witness who saw blood on a child. One child DID survive but they are not talking about that. Children DID see dead bodies. The first responders saw too much. This is not made up. I also know 3 first responders personally.
    Could there have been more than 1 shooter, I suppose it is not impossible. They were certainly looking for someone else for a while. Is the media and the government using this event, well you know they are. That does not make it fake.

  8. History is rife with manipulations of events whether they be for personal gain, the “benefit of the majority” or whatever. All one has to do is look at the books and see who wrote/edited them and what businesses or corporations are behind them. The same can be said for individuals, be they academics or lay people. There will always be someone somewhere ready to grab onto any professed idea and take it as truth. This professor’s points are no different. Keep and open mind and don’t be a lemming for anyone.

  9. What I wonder is, where were you, James Tracy, during 9/11, the Bush era, WMDs, and the Iraq “war”? Were you questioning the government and the media back then? I should hope so. The Bush administration and the media were pumping out the lies left and right. They were also poised to convince a scared public to relinquish theirs civil liberties.

  10. I applaud you Mr.Tracy. you have obviously hit the nail on the head when media calls you out personally. You have many people supporting!

  11. Mr. Tracy,
    I feel sadness for you as you have to carry the heaviest weight here. Please stay stong and I hope that someone (high in the puplic eye) comes to stand by your side soon.
    God Bless!

  12. Please don’t stop until the complete truth is out. Everyone has the right to know EXACTLY what happened. All holes in the story should be filled everyone especially the families of the victims deserve this! Release of school surveillance video would be a great start and proof of guns used and bullets used in all the shootings. Also some explanation of the car Adam drove belonging to someone with last name Rodia they never connected the dots on that either. Also Adam Lanza’s family has not formally spoken to the media at all this might fill in some gaps also.It is a little confusing as to why the media isn’t piecing this together for us what ever happened to investigative reporting?

  13. I am a mom and grandmother and I did not want to believe that we could be watching a cover up. After reading more into this and other government lies I want to thank you for your courage. It is truly horrific that no mainstream journalist has reported or investigated anything surrounding the questions. They must be very scared of losing their jobs. I was in shock to see the uncle and aunt of Noah Pozner (Alexis Ivar Haller and Victoria Haller Facebook messages) one comment I cannot get out of my mind is that he is the Vatican’s attorney. They have been on all sources of media interviews pushing gun laws and she proclaimed “OMG, my family is in the front row!” a fb comment said “at the White House.?” and she answered YES! no word of how horrific this has been on their family!! bragging about her husband being on CNN and on and on! I am not an advanced researcher and have nothing other than a screenshot of this, but I do not get it!!? Isn’t this a time for mourning?
    Where is the evidence? the janitor? the surveillance video? I am a mom and I would have ran in there to see if my child could be saved! have you seen the families of the Pakistan attack? They are holding their bloodied babies in their arms and that is real! I do not wish to see anyone hurt by my comments, I just want journalists to report the truth! We are scared not having logical explanations and it doesn’t make sense how this could have happened.

    The media had no problem showing us people jumping from buildings on 9/11.
    thank you

  14. Pingback: American Liberty Post › Sandy Hook Hoax, Questions and Evidence

  15. Pingback: The pros and cons of Sandy Hook as a special op | Intrepid Report.com

Comments are closed.