An Inquisitive Couple’s Visit to Newtown, Connecticut 333

Updated February 17, 2013

Photos and Commentary by Scott DeLarm
Edited by James F. Tracy


My partner and I became fed up with the mainstream media’s depiction of what took place in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012. So on January 20 we traveled there from our home in Ottawa Canada in an effort to visit the sites and respectfully approach the locals.





Before we even got off the highway there was a display of dozens of American flags on the shoulder. There is a large tented memorial located just off the freeway. The tent had a sign on the outside, “Sandy Hook Memorial Never Forgotten.” Inside the tent was a chaplain who asked that I not take any photos. There were hundreds of stuffed animals and candles as well as children’s art from around the country–if not the world. Inside was also a donation jar that was at mid-afternoon close to full of money. We signed one of the boards with condolences from Canada. I saw adults and children inside the tent on the two visits we made. No one was there who was impacted directly. I asked the chaplain if she had seen any children whom had been impacted. She did not answer.



We spent January 21 in Newtown visiting the Sandy Hook School and Sandy Hook Volunteer Fire House, Gene Rosen’s residence, the 100 Church Hill Restaurant (and pub), the Newtown Bee offices, as well as the Newtown Police Department. We found that the school can not be seen from the front when coming down Riverside Road which is the only access to the school passing the fire house. This may explain why there was no “media” photos of the broken / shot out glass at the front.




Dickenson Road was closed with layers of orange cones and numerous “No Trespassing” signs. The entire school is now enclosed with fencing, barbed wire, no trespass and surveillance signage.




The front of the school is entirely boarded up which would be consistent with broken glass. The lettering from the front of the school “Sandy Hook Elementary” is removed.





The side door and other windows were not boarded up.  No cameras could be seen at the front door or anywhere on the property.

Gene Rosen lives next door to the fire house. Thus Ms. Victoria Soto’s students that landed on Mr. Rosen’s yard had to come down Dickenson Drive and turn right, passing the fire house, to get to Mr. Rosen’s. A lady at the Rosen house would not answer the door when I knocked.


We sat at the 100 Church Hill Restaurant for a couple of hours. There were about 10 people inside. There were about 100 drawings from children from around the country (if not the world) offering condolences and well wishes. No one was talking about these.

My partner and I spoke with a couple in their early twenties for an hour or so. They were life long locals. Eventually they asked why we were in Newtown and we told them we had heard of their tragedy. They did not comment further and we did not push the issue.  Later, I mentioned that I had read online where some people had suggested that Newtown might have a lively Satanic community. One of the two locals remarked, “I could believe that.”


We then went to the offices of The Newtown Bee, the community’s  weekly newspaper, where we spoke with the editor, Mr. Curtis Clark. Mr. Clark did not offer a warm reception and stated from the start that they were concentrating the paper’s efforts on healing efforts and that he had little time. I told him I was there to follow up on The Bee’s report that stated, in part, “A man with a gun who was spotted in the woods near the school on the day of the incident was an off-duty tactical squad police officer from another town, according to the source.” I asked who this officer was, and why he was in the woods.


Mr. Clark told me that there was a number of “conspiracy theories floating around” and “some of them even suggest that the shooting didn’t even happen.” Furthermore, “ debunks many of these conspiracy theories.”

I told Clark I was familiar with Snopes, but it was The Bee that reported that this was an off duty officer prancing about in the woods on the day of the shooting. Clark would not address this report and became very agitated with me “interrogating” him. “I don’t intend to discuss this any further with you,” he said. Mr. Clark then referred me to the Newtown Police for any additional questions. As I was walking out of the office I overheard a lady on the phone explaining to a caller that “there is an ongoing investigation,” and referring the caller to


Next, we proceeded to the Newtown Police Department.  After entering I walked up to the glassed-in safety window, picked up the phone on the wall and asked the attendant on the other side if I could speak with the Communications Officer. I explained why. He directed me to  The Newtown Bee.

I advised him that The Bee had directed me to them and he asked me to have a seat. The room was rectangular with doors on both ends. Then, a male and female police officer simultaneously entered through each door. I addressed the female sergeant, telling her I would like to know who was the off duty tactical officer The Bee reported on on December 27. A male officer I was not addressing repeatedly ordered me to remove my hands from my pockets.


The female sergeant told me that the man detained was the uncle of a student at the school who had gone to get his niece. I asked about the police scanner audio where the dispatcher reports that a caller from inside the school saw “two shadows” run by the gym at the back of the school.

Additionally, an officer apparently arriving at the scene stated

“I’ve got ‘em (sic).  They are running at me down Crestwood.”

Crestwood Drive borders that backside of the school beyond some woods. The sergeant told me that this was the confusion of the day and that there were not two individuals. “It was just someone that went crazy, killed a bunch of people and then killed himself,” she said consolingly.

“You have nothing to worry about. You are safe.”

I still wonder.


James F. Tracy
February 17, 2013
Stefan Mark Stanford

Dear Stefan Mark Stanford,
I am addressing you as the publisher and legally responsible party of the website. It has come to my attention that you have appropriated my intellectual work and intentionally represented it in such a way that the original meaning of the work may be grossly misunderstood. This piece, edited for Scott DeLarm, initially appeared on my website, on January 28, 2012 as “An Inquisitive Couple’s Visit to Newtown Connecticut.” The article was republished in its original form with my consent by Global Research as “The Sandy Hook Tragedy: An Inquisitive Visit to Newtown Connecticut” on January 29, 2012.

On February 16, 2012 you republished a revised version of the piece with a new title, “Canadians Visit Sandy Hook, Astounding Revelations.” In the February 16 version by your contributor there are false and misleading claims of DeLarm’s alleged investigation of Iroquois Gas Company’s subterranean natural gas transmission lines in Newtown Connecticut. Your contributor’s clear appropriation and misuse of the piece is of special concern as I along with Delarm have in no way made such analyses or drew any such conclusions on the relationship of Iroquois Gas to the Sandy Hook tragedy and victim families. In the February 16 post to your site your contributor stripped the original title of said work and replaced it with another title and prefatory remarks, thus distorting the work’s original intent and calling into question your legally defensible republication of the work under “Fair Use” stipulated on my website.

On the morning of February 17 I noted that you have revised the piece, removed Mr. DeLarm’s name, and redirected readers to the original piece at Even though there are now seemingly two separate pieces and a link to my site the potential impression remains that DeLarm and I in some way investigated and implicated Iroquois Gas in the Sandy Hook tragedy–a claim we cannot realistically make and thus vigorously dispute.

Thank you for your prompt attention to the above.


James F. Tracy

Cc: GracePowers
Amenstop Productions,

About these ads


  1. Patricia, Twitter has left all of Dawn Hochsprung’s Tweets up

    There are a couple dozen photos she tweeted of the active school.

    That includes the photo of the evacuation drill–where the building behind the pupils is the shed southeast of the fire department–not another school.

    The volunteer fire department was there on Dec 12th all day and half a dozen photos of the day are posted here:

    There are two pre-tragedy photos in the Newtown Bee special edition:

    The Sandy Hook School website is still up and has dozens of photos where you can not only see the students but identify architectural aspects of the school confirming where the photos were taken: watch the photos in the upper right.

    Note also, that although the school was built in 1956, you can see that it has architecturally newer parts such as the right front. The school handbooks says: “Sandy Hook Elementary School was built in 1956. Additions were completed in 1964 and again in 1992.
    Four portable classrooms were added in July of 2000 to accommodate increases in enrollment.” You can see all of those changes in the photos and aerial photos and footage.

    The entire 2010-11 School Handbook is online:

    The Newtown Bee published a 56 page 2012 Bus Route .pdf

    There’s a photo of a school bus in front of the school. And the Newtown Bee couldn’t have retroactively created the detailed bus routes listed for Sandy Hook and then re-posted a new .pdf after everyone in Newtown had already had a chance to download it. That would strain any conspiracy theory.

    You can also put the URL for the bus routes .pdf into the Wayback Machine and find archived copies of the page:

    Besides the “iconic” photo that Shannon Hicks took of the group of kids being led out of the school, two more photos have shown up: one is a photo of Shannon Hicks taking the photo of the children leaving the school, the other is of another group of kids being led out of the school.

    Hopefully these resources will help us move to accept that, indeed, the school was an active school.

  2. Pingback: Why is Sandy Hook Elementary School Shut Down, Enclosed with Fencing, Barbed Wire, no Trespass and Surveillance Signage? « Socio-Economics History Blog

Comments are closed.