Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook Was an Elaborate Hoax

Updated February 11, 2014 [Video]

By Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm, James Tracy, Jim Fetzer and the Sandy Hook Research Group

“[T]he names and ‘contextually identifying information of involved children’ were withheld, including descriptions of the children, their clothing and their belongings”–Reuben F. Bradford, Commissioner, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection

Everyone must check inThe New York Times, our nation’s newspaper of record (which records the “official history” of the United States), has reported that, with its “final report,” the criminal investigation of Sandy Hook by the State of Connecticut is over. 

Remarkably, the report does not even include the names, the ages or the sex of the alleged victims of the shooting. There is no actual identification of any of the dead. Even the Danbury, CT, Newstimes found it unsatisfying.

Even the 52 “autopsy photos” that accompany the report are redacted. The Times itself appears to be responsible for a stunning display of journalistic incompetence on a matter of enormous public concern. 

Anyone with the inclination can comb through hundreds of years of American crime reports and will not find an instance in the which the names, the ages or the sex of the victims is not given–with the exception of victims of sex crimes.  Withholding this information is part of a pattern of deception and deceit that extends to the Clerk of Newtown making secret arrangements with the state legislature to avoid releasing death certificates to the public, attempts to withhold the 911 calls and gag orders imposed upon those responsible for tearing down the building itself:

In a letter accompanying the report, Reuben F. Bradford, the commissioner of the state’s Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, said the names and “contextually identifying information of involved children” were withheld, including descriptions of the children, their clothing and their belongings. “All visual images depicting the deceased have been withheld,” he added, “as well as written descriptions whose disclosure would be highly offensive to a reasonable person and would violate the constitutional rights of the families.”

The commissioner said that balancing the “often competing interests of government transparency and individual privacy has been difficult,” but the situation is completely absurd.  This appears to be only the latest in a series of obscene measures being adopted to conceal from the public that the Sandy Hook “massacre” was in fact an elaborately staged hoax, which no one who takes a serious look at the evidence can reasonably deny because, in view of what we have now proven about the event, no alternative explanation is reasonable.

The basic principle that applies here is inference to the best explanation. Consider the totality of the evidence in this case.  Is the evidence more probable on the hypothesis that Sandy Hook was a real event or that it was instead an exercise (or a “drill”) , which was presented as though it had been a real event?  The hypothesis that confers the highest probability on the evidence is the preferable, which, when the evidence has “settled down,” is acceptable as true in the tentative and fallible fashion of science. Here are the “top ten” reasons that support the conclusion that Sandy Hook was staged and not real, where no children or adults appear to have died there.

1. Proof of death has been suppressed

UntitledTwenty-eight people allegedly died: 27 children and adults, including Adam Lanza,  at the school, and his mother, Nancy Lanza, in her home at 36 Yogananda Street, Newtown. However, there is no direct proof of their death: no photographic evidence or video footage was released to confirm the official story that these 28 persons actually died. In fact, no video surveillance footage shows anything—not even Adam shooting out the front plate-glass window or walking through the halls like Rambo, even though this is a school that had updated its security system at the start of the 2012-13 academic year.

The best the authorities could come up with was a heavily redacted report that includes numerous photos of the inside of the school, with a few dings that look like bullet holes, several bullets on the floor, and many black images with white numbers, which we are supposed to associate with dead people. One photo (left) shows the blown-out glass window through which Adam Lanza presumably entered the premises. But how did he get past the furniture, with all his weaponry, without moving anything out of position?

Compounding the situation, the parents were not even allowed to view their children’s bodies to identify them. Instead, they were reportedly shown photographs of the deceased. This was done, according to the Medical Examiner, Wayne Carver, in order to “control the situation.” But what was there about the situation that required “control”? No parent of our acquaintance would have agreed to accept the death of a child without viewing the body. James Tracy has published a discussion of the medical examiner’s performance.  According to Carver:

Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We have, uh, uh—it’s easier on the families when you do that. Un, there is, uh, a time and place for the up close and personal in the grieving process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be best to do it this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a situation depending on the photographer, and I have very good photographers. Uh, but uh—

Remarkably, the state has done its best to avoid releasing the death certificates and even recordings of the 911 calls. Death certificates were eventually “released” but not to the public or those who might want to investigate the case further, where only a short, general summary was available. According to The New York Times, in relation to the 911 calls, “no children are identified by name, no callers indicate that they can see a child being shot, and the only injury described is that of an educator’s being shot in the foot.”

Moreover, the funerals were all “closed casket,” with one exception—that of Noah Pozner, which supposedly included a private viewing before the public ceremony.. As recounted in interviews with the families, the circumstances of their last encounters with their children (or with their caskets) are strange to say the least. The “love fest” at the white coffin of Grace McDonnell was detailed on CNN for Anderson Cooper:

YouTube Video

Veronique Pozner gave her account of her last look at her son Noah to the Jewish Daily Forward on 26 December 2013.

Veronique asked the medical examiners not to autopsy her son; she felt that his body had suffered too many indignities. At his funeral, Noah was dressed in a suit and tie. A Jewish friend of Veronique’s at work enjoined Rabbi Praver to allow him to be wrapped in a blue tallis, even though he had not yet had a bar mitzvah.The family placed stuffed animals, a blanket and letters to Noah into the casket. Lastly, Veronique put a clear plastic rock with a white angel inside — an “angel stone” — in his right hand. She asked the funeral director to place an identical one in his left, which was badly mangled.

Just before the ceremony, Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy came to the funeral home to pay his respects. Veronique took him by the arm and brought him to the casket. Noah’s famously long eyelashes — which she spoke about in her eulogy — rested lightly on his cheeks and a cloth covered the place where the lower half of his face had been. “I just needed it to be real for [the governor],” she says. “This was a live, warm, energetic little boy whose life was snuffed out in a fraction of a second because our schools are so defenseless.”

2. Emergency protocols were not followed

There is no evidence of any frantic effort to save lives or to remove bodies to hospitals; instead the scene outside the school looked calm and largely bloodless—with police and other personnel milling around casually and a severe shortage of dead or injured victims. One Sandy Hook researcher decided to call Lt. Paul Vance to ask who cleaned up the blood, which would have been considered to be a bio-hazard, and got the reply, “What blood?” Here is Jim Fetzer’s interview with Kelley from Tulsa on “The Real Deal” where she discusses this, which also includes several of the 911 calls.

Kelley was onto a real issue. Under the CT Medical Waste Tracking Act of 1988, a paper trail must kept by all parties involved in the clean up and must be tracked all the way to the incinerator with names and dates.

In a Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) like Sandy Hook, the proper protocol is START triage (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment) using tarps of different colors with the aim being to save lives and get the injured to the hospital for treatment.  Not even the black tarps for the dead were used, much less the red ones for those who needed immediate treatment.  As Sofia Smallstorm has documented, nothing at all like this occurred at Sandy Hook: the appropriate protocols were not followed:

YouTube Video

Sandy Hook Fire Chief Bill Halstead was ready to help the victims but could recall only two wounded people. A few survivors were reportedly taken to the hospital, but, oddly, these people were never interviewed. There were no first-hand accounts that proved anyone was killed or injured. Nonetheless, according to Lt. Vance, 18 children were pronounced dead at the scene, two children were removed to “an area hospital” and were pronounced dead at the hospital, and seven adults were pronounced dead at the scene, including the shooter (NBC).

No emergency vehicles were present at the school or even lined up in the fire lane for a rescue attempt—the parking lot was filled with parked cars, police cars and possibly media vehicles. Such rescue activity as occurred was centered, not on the school premises, but at the nearby Firehouse. Emergency vehicles at the Firehouse were jammed together impeding access to the school, in case anyone might have thought about attempting a rescue. The scene at the Firehouse was quite peculiar, with people milling around and circling through the building, walking out one door and into another, to give the impression of lots of people and lots of action:

YouTube Video

3. Drill protocols were followed instead

We are now living in a security state, and the school system is among its beneficiaries. While we used to have “fire drills” from time to time, we now have “lockdown drills” implemented by school districts, with some states requiring a set number of drills by law. Private security firms, which operate for profit, now conduct “crisis preparedness assessments” at the tax-payer’s expense.

Larger scenarios are also developed as active-shooter drills, in which local law enforcement can take part in storming a school in pursuit of an active-actor-shooter. One such plan available on the web is “Operation Closed Campus” developed in Iowa following guidance set forth by the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) of the US Department of Homeland Security.

According to protocol, everyone at the drill must check in, identification badges are issued to personnel and observers, and drinking water and restrooms are available. Personnel include the director, staff, controllers, evaluators, actors, media personnel and “players” (agency employees) both in uniforms and civilian clothes. This protocol appears to have been followed at Sandy Hook, where many participants wore ID/identification badges on lanyards, a huge check-in sign is visible and even Porta Potties are at the ready.

YouTube Video

An emergency preparedness drill took place on 14 December 2012, 9 AM to 4 PM/ET, in Bridgeport, CT, which is a 20 minute drive from Sandy Hook. The course was run by the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection/Emergency Management and Homeland Security, entitled “Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters.”

The Sandy Hook “shooting” appears to have been an Integrated Capstone Event (ICE), an exercise run by FEMA to coordinate federal, state and local emergency response teams in the case of a mass-casualty event. As such, it would have utilized actors and media partners to simulate a tragedy in order to train participants, and also in order to observe the reaction of the citizenry.

4. There was foreknowledge of the event

The Connecticut state emergency system was taken over long before the “massacre” occurred, with a frequency change implemented five hours in advance of the “shooting.” Normal police and EMS dispatch protocol, using the Alpha Phonetic System for communications between officers and dispatchers, was replaced with staged transmissions by non-trained personnel. 

In addition, tweets about the shooting began before it occurred, a tribute was apparently uploaded one month before the event, and web pages honoring the victims, including a Facebook page R.I.P. Victoria Soto, were established before they had “officially” died. 

YouTube Video

A Sandy Hook timeline has been reconstructed at, detailing major developments and highlighting the numerous inconsistencies in reports by the media.

5. There were contradictory reports about the weapons

According to initial reports in the media, weapons used in the shooting included four handguns recovered at the scene, the only guns taken into the school (NBC). Then an AR-15 was said to have been found in the trunk of Lanza’s car (NBC). Then it was reported that Lanza may have carried only two handguns and that a rifle was also found in the school (NBC).

Dr. Carver's bizarre presss conference

Wayne Carver, the Medical Examiner, said that all the victims were shot with the “long weapon.” Lt. Paul Vance then said that a Bushmaster AR-15 assault weapon with high capacity magazines was used “most of the time” and that Lanza was carrying “many high-capacity clips” for the weapon (Huffington Post).

In January 2013, Connecticut state police released a statement indicating that they had found four guns inside the school: a Bushmaster .223 caliber XM 15-E2S semi-automatic rifle with high capacity 30 round clips, a Glock 10-mm handgun and a Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun. They said they also found an Izhmash Canta-12 12-gauge shotgun in Lanza’s car (NBC).

This shotgun is also shown in a video aired on the night of 14 December 2013  by NBC. An evidence collection team and a policeman find the gun in the trunk of Lanza’s Honda Civic—the policeman handles the gun without gloves and ejects the ammunition on the spot. Some have seen two long guns in the trunk in the NBC video: the 12-gauge shotgun and the Bushmaster rifle.

YouTube Video

Lt. Vance then asserted that Lanza had killed all his victims with the .223-caliber semi-automatic rifle ( Regarding the confusion, Vance told reporters, “It’s all these conspiracy theorists that are trying to mucky up the waters.” Perhaps “The Top Prize for Fantastical Reporting” goes to Fox News, however, which announced that a 12-gauge shotgun along with two magazines containing 70 rounds of Winchester 12-gauge shotgun rounds had been found in the glove compartment of Adam Lanza’s Honda Civicthat’s right, in the glove compartment.

6. Adam Lanza cannot have done the shooting

Adam Lanza, reportedly a frail young man weighing 120 pounds with Asperger’s Syndrome, is said to have carried massive weaponry on his person when he shot his way into the Sandy Hook school and proceeded to kill 26 people and then himself. This after he supposedly killed his mother before driving to the school.

Adam Lanza

According to State’s Attorney Stephen Sedensky, Lanza killed his 26 victims with the Bushmaster .223-caliber rifle and then killed himself with his Glock 10-mm handgun. Lanza was also supposedly carrying three 30-round magazines for the Bushmaster as well as a Sig-Sauer 9 mm handgun (see above). The victims were shot multiple times each in a fusillade of bullets from these military-style weapons. In order to wreak this havoc, he fired more than 150 rounds, and he must have carried more rounds in addition. Lanza was reportedly found dead wearing a bulletproof vest and military-style clothing (AP).

As Mike Powers, a professional military investigator and ballistics expert, has observed, this young man of slight build could not have carried all these heavy, bulky weapons and ammunition on his person. Furthermore, since first responders were supposedly inside the school within seven minutes, there was not enough time for Lanza to have carried out the shooting as reported. In an interview with Joyce Riley, Powers states that Lanza could not have fired so many times continuously without destabilizing himself from the intense noise from the Bushmaster. As a novice, he could not have shot an AR-15 with such speed and accuracy, supposedly changing magazines 8-10 times without a stoppage.

According to Lt. Vance on the night of the shooting, one victim survived. So in less than seven minutes—or less than five minutes according to the media—Lanza killed 26 people and then himself, producing only one injured victim. This is a 96% kill ratio, which is unheard-of accuracy among the most experienced marksmen. Powers thinks the whole scenario is a physical impossibility. He is not even convinced that Adam Lanza was a real person. The story of the shooting should not be taken seriously.

YouTube Video

The final travesty involves the weapons and other paraphernalia that were allegedly found in the Lanza house. The “arsenal” supposedly included guns, Samurai swords, knives, a bayonet and more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition, according to search warrants released. Other items of interest were ear and eye protection, binoculars, holsters, manuals, paper targets, a military-style uniform and Lanza’s NRA certificate (Fox). Lanza had reportedly compiled a spreadsheet 7 feet long and 4 feet wide in 9-point type detailing 500 victims of other mass murders (CBS). We are supposed to believe this, and, at the same time, that Adam Lanza was a shy, quiet kid who didn’t like noise and chaos, as promoted by the PBS Frontline Special, “Raising Adam Lanza.”

7. Key participants displayed inappropriate behavior

There are many bizarre media reports and interviews of those associated with the “shooting.” Some examples:

Wayne Carver—Medical Examiner Wayne Carver’s surreal press conference is one of the most startling of all the media offerings. Widely available on youtube, this event shows H. Wayne Carver II, a public official of some standing, clowning and acting outlandish—grinning strangely, making irrelevant comments, and basically appearing unknowledgeable and unprofessional.

YouTube Video

Robbie Parker—Perhaps the most famous press conference is that of Robbie Parker, the alleged father of victim Emilie Parker, speaking on a CNN report of December 15, 2012. He chuckles as he walks up to the camera, then gets into character by hyperventilating, and finally feigns distress as he talks about his daughter—and about the fund set up to help raise money “for Emilie.”

YouTube Video

The families—In addition to Robbie and Alissa Parker, other parents and family members take their turn in the spotlight, including (but not limited to) Mark and Jackie Barden, Jimmy Greene and Nelba Marquez-Greene, Ian and Nicole Hockley, Neil Heslin (alleged father of Jesse Lewis), Chris and Lynn McDonnell, Veronique Pozner, Carlee Soto, and David and Francine Wheeler. Anderson Cooper is the interviewer in two notable instances: his conversation with the McDonnells mentioned above, and an interview with Veronique Pozner, remarkable for its green-screen effects such as Anderson’s disappearing nose.

YouTube Video

The school nurse—Numerous reports offer detailed and totally fictitious information, some of which was later abandoned in favor of more tenable versions. On the evening of December 14, a USA Today reporter said she had spoken with the school nurse, whom she had met on the street. The nurse told her that the gunman had come into her office, “they met eyes, she jumped under her desk,” and he walked out.  The nurse said that the gunman was the son of the kindergarten teacher, who was known to her and “an absolutely loving person.” It later developed that Nancy Lanza had not been a kindergarten teacher at all, and that neither Nancy nor Adam had any connection to Sandy Hook school whatsoever.

YouTube Video

Dawn Hochsprung—In an embarrassing fiction, The Newtown Bee reported on 14 December 2013  that Dawn Hochsprung, the Sandy Hook school principal, told the paper that a masked man had entered the school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots – more than she could count – that went “on and on.” Of course, Dawn Hochsprung was allegedly killed by Adam Lanza and so could not easily have provided this statement. In fact, Dawn was said to have acted heroically, dying while lunging at the gunman—although one wonders who witnessed and reported this act of heroism. On 17 December 2013, The Bee retracted the report and apologized:

An early online report from the scene at the December 14 shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School quoted a woman who identified herself to our reporter as the principal of the school. The woman was not the school’s principal, Dawn Hochsprung, who was killed in the Friday morning attack. The quote was removed from subsequent online versions of the story, but the original story did remain in our online archive for three days before being deleted. We apologize for whatever confusion this may have caused our readers and for any pain or anguish it may have caused the Hochsprung family.

Gene Rosen—Gene Rosen is one of the most prolific of the Sandy Hook media stars, giving animated and conflicting statements to a series of reporters (in English and Spanish). Considered a “good Samaritan” by the mainstream media, Gene supposedly harbored six children who ran away from the school, rode to his house on a school bus, sat down on his lawn and proceeded to cry and tell him that their teacher, Miss Soto, was dead. Strangely, Rosen took the children inside and gave them some toys to play with, instead of calling 911 like any normal person.

YouTube Video

The Gene Rosen videos are important for the official narrative, in that they corroborate many of its details: the staccato gunfire (and thus a semi-automatic weapon) and heresay evidence from the children (Lanza had a big gun and a little gun, Vicki Soto was killed, etc.).These incriminating videos are some of the best evidence that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax.

8. Photos at scene and of victims look staged or fake

The only photo we have seen of any children being evacuated from the school was apparently taken earlier in the fall during a drill (no coats, smiling faces). Shannon Hicks, a photographer for The Newtown Bee, took the photo and claims to have taken many others of the event—which have not been released.

Shannon Hicks

Hicks reportedly took this photo “as an associate editor” and then, when another editor arrived, “changed into her firefighting gear and tried to help.” The account was promoted by NPR.

Parker family

Perhaps more insidious are the photographs of the children who allegedly died at Sandy Hook, many of which are concoctions prepared on Photoshop. Some of the most problematic involve the Parker family, with Emilie’s red-and-black dress supposedly worn by her younger sister for the visit with Obama.

YouTube Video

The photograph of Victoria Soto’s class of students has been shown to be an elaborate composite:

YouTube Video

And many of the individual images of the children released to the media are peculiar—some look outdated and may be old photos.  In a very sloppy slip-up, a photo of a real child, Lily Gaubert (right, below), who is alive and well, was promoted in the media as an image of Allison Wyatt (left, below), an alleged victim. Lily’s mother discovered the error and made it public.

Allison Wyatt vs. Lily Gaubert

And the ridiculously fraudulent photographs of Adam Lanza clearly do not depict a real person:

YouTube Video

9. The crime scene was completely destroyed

As with Ground Zero after 9/11, Sandy Hook Elementary and all the evidence have been completely obliterated; $50 million in CT state funds were allocated for the demolition and rebuilding of Sandy Hook school. This would never have been tolerated if an actual crime had been committed—at least one that was meant to be investigated. The demolition of the school has now been declared complete.
Sandy Hook demolition

Employees who worked on the project were required to sign non-disclosure agreements. They were not only prohibited from removing anything from the site, but they were forbidden from discussing publicly anything they may have observed or not observed during the demolition, such as an absence of bullet marks on the walls or blood on the floor of the classrooms.

10. Deceased children sang at the Super Bowl

Recent research has resulted in a “Sandy Hoax Surprise,” a convincing youtube video identifying eight alleged Sandy Hook victims and six of their brothers singing in the Newtown children’s choir at the 2013 Super Bowl.

YouTube Video

One more victim has been identified since the original video, making a total of 15 out of the 21 children in the choir who were from the Sandy Hook “families.” The newly recognized “victims” are all older than they appear in their photos, giving credence to the theory that the children’s photographs were outdated images.

YouTube Video

The Newtown children, whoever they are, seem quite happy to be singing at the Super Bowl, smiling and running across the field after the event—giving no sign of the trauma they had been through less than two months prior. So are these children actually alive? One can only hope. 

Cui bono?

The evidence demonstrates (1) that proof of death has been suppressed, (2) that emergency protocols were not followed, (3) that drill protocols were followed, (4) that there was foreknowledge of the event, (5) that there was confusion over what weapons were used, (6) that the suspect cannot possibly have carried out the shooting as claimed, (7) that strange behavior was displayed by officials, witnesses and relatives, (8) that there are many odd photos of participants, (9) that the crime scene was destroyed under conditions of secrecy and (10) that some of the children appeared at the Super Bowl.

With the possible exception of (5) and (9), all of these features would have low probabilities had Sandy Hook been a massacre but high probabilities were it merely a drill.  Some of them are decisive by themselves, such as (1), (2), (3), (4) and (6)–not to mention (10).  EMTs cannot make determinations of whether a victim is dead or alive, so there should have been a surge of EMTs into the building to rush those little bodies off to hospitals where doctors could determine their condition.  But that was not done–and nothing else about this event supports the conclusion that it was real. On the contrary, virtually everything indicates that this was a drill.

Going in circles

The probability of the evidence on the hypothesis that this was a drill is overwhelmingly greater than on the hypothesis that it was an actual massacre. And the evidence appears to have “settled down” and point in the same direction. No alternative is reasonable, which means it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. So who did it and why? This is the final question. If the perpetrator had been Adam Lanza, then he had no apparent motive, as even “the final report” acknowledged.  When considering cui bono (who benefits), a large amount of money is at stake–and much of it has already been distributed.

Follow the Money

First of all, the construction industry got a boost, with the $50 million in Connecticut state funds allocated for the destruction of Sandy Hook School and to rebuild a new school on the premises. And this from a state with a projected budget deficit of $1.1 billion for the coming year.

The Sandy Hook School Support Fund has raised approximately $12 million and distributed it to the Newtown-Sandy Hook Community Foundation, overseen by Ken Feinberg, “a victim compensation master with a national reputation,” according to United Way Western Connecticut. And the Support Fund posted its condolences on 11 December 2013, which was three days before the actual event.

Premature announcements
The estimated payout was $281,000 paid to each of the victims’ families, who have raised additional funds from their own websites—some of which were apparently advertised on the web in advance of the shooting. At present, all of the victims, both children and adults, have memorial funds that are currently collecting money.

“Sandy Hook Promise,” which actively solicits money for family members and others “impacted by this tragedy,” as well as for lobbying for “mental wellness and gun safety,” currently boasts over 300,000 people who have made the “Sandy Hook Promise” to turn the “tragedy into a moment of transformation.”

The federal government has also forked over a lot of taxpayer money, including a $150,000 federal grant to Newtown to pay for two “school resource officers” (aka police), and $2.5 million in federal funds to compensate the local entities for their trouble: $663,444 to the Connecticut State Police, $602,293 to the town of Newtown, $882,812 to the town of Monroe and $296,838 to other partner agencies. This hush money is sure to keep the lid on things for now.

In addition, the Department of Education has awarded a total of $3.2 million to the Newtown Public School District under the Project SERV (School Emergency Response to Violence) to help with ongoing recovery efforts following the shooting. See these reports: US Department of Education awards 1.3 million grant; US Department of Education awards 1.9 million grant. This hush money is sure to keep the lid on things for now.

Gun Control

The families have been out in force, appearing on television and in print, lobbying for gun control in the states and the US capitol. By now, their stories are known to everyone in America. This has created an impression that the Sandy Hook hoax was about gun control. Meanwhile, however, the gun industry has benefited immensely.

Efforts to increase security in schools—and even arm teachers—are underway. The New York Times reports that around 1,500 state gun bills have been introduced since the time of the shooting, and 109 have become law. However, nearly two-thirds of these laws ease legal restrictions and support the rights of gun owners. 

This may well have been an unintentional consequence of an intentional plan. Nonetheless, it is not clear that the Sandy Hook event was carried out solely with the aim of disarming the American public. Perhaps we are seeing a kind of Homeland-Gladio—implementing a strategy of tension with real and simulated events. Remarkably, one of the earliest school safety/gun control proposals came from the family of Noah Pozner:

New Proposal from Noah Pozner family
Both the gun industry and the already immense and rapidly growing “security industry” have also benefitted from the Sandy Hook “shooting,” as we, the citizens of the United States, lose more of our Constitutional rights. A more subtle but nonetheless insidious effect relates to the promotion of mental health screening and the consequent medication of the “mentally unstable” in our society, based upon an event that did not take place, where President Obama has signed an on-going series of executive orders to implement a political agenda. For the latest, check this one out.

The emergence of the Department of Homeland Security as a major threat to democracy cannot go without comment. Even though a subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Intelligence released a report on 3 October 2012 establishing the virtual non-existence of domestic terrorist threats, DHS has acquired more than 2 billion rounds of .40 calibre hollow-point ammunition. Sandy Hook appears to be part of a complex and evolving scenario, beginning with 9/11, to establish an enhanced Police State. Whether or not it succeeds depends on public awareness and political action.

Vivian Lee, Ph.D., is a Sandy Hook researcher and professor at an East Coast University. Sofia Smallstorm is an independent researcher, who produced and directed “Unraveling Sandy Hook.” James Tracy, Ph.D., maintains a web site at And Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.

This article originally appeared at Veterans Today on January 8, 2014. Republished with permission.

955 thoughts on “Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook Was an Elaborate Hoax”

  1. Thank you! Well done. A package of concrete information that is easily communicable to the believers of the popular mythical version.

    1. Thanks for your obs. on the fence. I know that if the school were closed and this was a govt planned psyop, than the whole area would have had to be secured due to govt protocol. They couldn’t have had copper and metal thieves strip that vacant building in say, July of 2012! That would sure would have changed the plans!

      The fence and plywood were already in place, and just peeled back for the drill, and then quickly put back.

  2. Has anybody looked at the report documentation?

    1. Not a single witness has identified Lanza accurately. Every child witness said the shooter was wearing green or beige. Hammond said he was wearing a mask. Cox said he was wearing blue pants with boots. Halstead said he was wearing sunglasses. Multiple police said he was wearing green BDU pants.

    One teacher, in a closet adjacent to one of the assaulted rooms, overheard the shooter verbally taunting the victims.

    2. Book 6 Document –

    000026724 State Police Sgt Cario stated that when he met the officers in the lobby that the shooter “ducked” into a classroom on the left. There was a volly of fire and then quiet.

    3. BOOK 6 Documents – 00001113, 00002060

    Lt Vanghele and Rache Van Ness said a New York area man was in cuffs because he was caught at the scene and had no explanation why he was there. He was brought back to the PD. Lt Vanghele said he later learned that the guy had an APP that alerted him to the shooting and he went there out of curiosity. Why didn’t he tell the officers about his cell phone app when they cuffed him ?

  3. More report issues and questions.

    Is this a new discovery ? Several allusions are made that Kaitlin Roig’s cell phone was taken from her room by the shooter. She expressed concern to a trooper that the shooter would have access to her personal information.

    The State Police did a ping trace on the phone and searched a local glass store close by. Apparently without success.

    I don’t know if they ever located her phone or where.

    Also- who put the hand cuffs on Lanza ?

    1. “Hand cuffs on Lanza”? Where is this new information? According to the narrative, he committed suicide. If the handcuff detail is true, when were they put on, before or after the suicide?

      1. I believe several officers alluded to the cuffs – I will try to get document references for you.

        Roig’s cell missing cell phone crisis is book 6 doc 00017426

      2. Penna’s statement also – which means that in all likelihood it was Chapman or Smith that put the cuffs on Lanza.

        Book 6 – Penna Doc 00258036

    2. soon to be censored from the Newtown Patch

      I support Hovey 110 percent. Giffords is not here to comfort the families she is here to promote her anti second amendment agenda.

      If she really cared about the families in Newtown she would have met with the families discretely without visiting Michael Bloomberg first and without all the fanfare.

      Sadly even our own Dr. Begg chose to use our tragedy to make a blatantly political statement engaging the demagoguery without any substantive assessment as to the causes of gun violence and meaningful remedial proposals.

      Do not delude yourselves. Anti 2nd amendment advocates will continue to exploit the deaths of these children for their own political purposes as long as you allow it.

      I for one will not be silent and will speak out against their reproachable behavior.

      1. Has anyone noticed a connection between Caroline Kennedy and Giffords? I imagine there are real victims and families of victims of gun violence who may be caught up in these hoaxes for what they believe are genuinely good reasons. If we discount their sincere motivation, we fail to understand the phenomenon. (What I don’t get is the early connection between a fire at the Kennedy Library and the so-called Marathon Bombings – a connection the press first made, then discarded).

        1. P.s. Caroline gave a Profile in Courage award to Giffords at Kennedy Library, who then went to see bombing “victims” at Spaulding rehab, I believe. So that is the connection I am making between them. The award was announced before the alleged bombing, in March 2013 (bombing hoax happened in April).

  4. Lanza is listed as 112 pounds. Gene rosen says he heard shots at 9:15. The cover up re: the foia, privacy controversy, massive redactions; I would say this is the most obvious proof of hoax. The blatantly poor condition of the school, plus the lack of Christmas decorations. Lack of first response is massive. The media and government are so heavily invested in this there will never be any kind of admission, ever. We find ourselves in the same position as JFK researchers in the mid 60s. All we can do is keep hammering home and documenting the lies. I would say our best bet would be a celebrity coming out, but that would be sure career suicide, “don’t you care about the children”, “how can you be so callous”, “tinfoil hat”, etc.

    1. Larry, I am sure that there are some celebrities that know that SHES is a complete Hoax. What percentage of the US population thinks of this event as a Hoax? I would guess 20%, and that is significant enough to permeate all walks of life 🙂 Our goal for critical tipping would have to be greater than 35% which is very doable 🙂

      1. John, I think many celebs question SH, but they are on THEIR side so they keep their mouths shut. If you were making millions from Hollywood, would you open up and run your mouth about the SH hoax? Most people in Hollywood surely know that Jews dominate Hollywood relative to their 2% population in our country. And they know that the Jews in media manipulate information through their movies, ‘news,’ and tv shows. But once you are in the click, would you step away from the fame and fortune of Hollywood?

        1. “Clique.”

          This theory might perhaps be contemplated alongside the United States’ established tradition of Jewish presidents, CIA Directors, and Pentagon Joint Chiefs.

        2. I am not a big Jewish conspiracy guy. Because of the sheer number of Jews involved I could see someone saying to those who became aware of the scam, or had a change of heart, “hey, you don’t want to make us look bad do you?”

        3. I am just talking shear numbers here. If 20% of the population firmly believes this event to be a hoax, shouldn’t that number be close to all walks of life? I do not know what the actual percentage is for sure without an actual, unbiased poll, but conclude that is a reasonable figure. I do know that if that percentage was increased to 35%, that in fact would be the tipping point. Probability dictates that someone with notoriety, fame, or money will come forward.

        4. Race and religion are “not” relevant to what we are looking at here Bill. Money and controlling power is. Your thinking is shallow and very much off the mark. Think about that.

        5. I would be far more interested in hearing from someone with a strong legal background at this stage John. Having the “stars” come out as aware of 9-11 being an inside job has not brought the perpetrators any closer to their judgment day.

        6. “Jewish” is not a religion, nor race. This has already been proven. Jews take in all walks of life – atheists, Christians, gays, blacks, etc. Terry, no society should be ruled by a group that only represents 2% of the population. Of course, Jews do not “rule” the U.S. but they are definitely over-represented in banking, media and government. The Jews in Hollywood and MSM are already not to be trusted due to their lies, propaganda, violence, sexual exploitation and political manipulation.

    2. We agree fully in presuming these people will never reveal the lie they’re involved in, as it would mean certain doom to themselves, their families, and to the other participants that they’ve Promised.

  5. This article should be published in every newspaper and magazine in the country. I am so tired of so many people denying the truth because they would rather go on believing that their authority figures would never tell them such huge lies–or what their motivation(s) might be.

    1. Joevines, this is exactly why the corporate media needs to come crumbling down. They will never publish this kind of information, nor will they allow an honest debate about 9/11. The media’s job is to shut the door about these topics and keep us talking about Trayvon Martin, Duck Dynasty, Peyton Manning and the rest of the distractions.

  6. Final shot by police on Lanza?

    I found this on GLP- very interesting. In Penna’s statement he asserted that he believed Lanza was shot by LE but that he did not hear any gun shots. Other report documentation indicate the shooter was fatally wounded by police.

    For what it’s worth :

    It’s in one of Pisani’s calls, right where it should be.

    Pisani’s call starts at 9:50:35 a.m. and is found in Exhibit 349 (the CSP 911 and dispatch audio files), named “StartTime 2012-12-14 14-50-35 Logger 45170321 Channel 3 RadiREDACTED.”

    The shot is at 00:56 into this call, which equates perfectly to 9:51:31 on the timeline…right where Sedensky himself stated the shooter response team entered Room 10.

    Here’s the audio file of that call:

    [link to (secure)]

    Perhaps this is why Pisani’s name was kept such a mystery for many months after Sandy Hook.

  7. Events “drive” History. (i.e. 9/11 – the “Mother of all Events”) This event (Sandy Hook) is one of the many “twisted spawns” from September 11, 2001.

    1. You say Lanza’s gun was holstered? Interesting. I wonder if that was done after he was handcuffed? I wonder whose fingerprints are on that gun? I wonder if he was dead long before he was shot in the back of the head? Would that account for the lack of blood spray on his hat?

      So many questions. So many lies. How can the MSM ignore all these questions and talking points? Do we need to invite the Guardian to investigate?

      We need to challenge the State of Connecticut for access to all that redacted information.

    2. That certainly is against all operating procedure, to leave a weapon holstered on a “shooter” whether he is handcuffed, deceased or for any reason. The number 1 task is to remove the threat which is all encompassing….that means all weapons are immediately secured, period. A holstered weapon, whether suspect is dead or alive, is a no no.

      1. Again, how do they know he’s dead until the medical examiner says so? There are some assumptions which standard training teaches one not to make. I keep thinking of that movie line “Was you ever stung by a dead bee?” Any weapon can kill you even if a dead person jerks around in some way (as they have been known to do). It’s imperative to take it off them.

        1. Dear Friends–all this conflicting information about Adam Lanza, “the shooter,” as to whether he killed himself or was shot by LE, as to whether he was handcuffed, dead or alive, as to whether his gun was holstered, is interesting but in the end irrelevant. There was no shooter Adam Lanza, and in fact no Adam Lanza. We can read through the CT report and pick out interesting details, but we must not forget that the report is a sham. The only thing it is good for is its conflicts and obvious errors proving it to be one:)

        2. The conflicting information, from the official narrative, shows very shoddy police work and clear evidence of police misconduct. Even if the event were real, and there was an Adam Lanza who survived, there is no way a conviction would result. The verdict is clearly Not Guilty. Yes, we know it was a Drill. It was so poorly written that it is a complete joke.

        3. Well John, if you are calling this badly staged event “a drill”, my question is….Who’s drill?

          The sign at the fire station said “everyone must register”…..Who is “everyone”? There certainly were enough images of “tags” on hips and jackets for me to be convinced that there were a lot of “registered” role players there.

          We are certainly not talking ethnic/religious terrorists, or communists, or your typical agents of a foreign government at work here. So who is left?

          Can there really be so many totally loyal and dedicated NWO operative agents embedded among us, that they can be living as “families” and willing to use their own children?

          Can they really be financed so well, that they are taking over entire American towns just to stage events like this?

          That’s “crazy talk/thinking” for sure, isn’t it!

          If this is where the evidence leads us, like any other staged event, the “conspirators”, whoever they really are, had to be in charge of “scheduling” to be able to have all of “their” operatives in the “key positions” of control throughout the event.

          At a minimum, we are talking about everyone in charge of scheduling for the media, the police, and the private sectors with any significant role to play on that day, had to be in on it.

          As an example, all of the police do not have to be involved, but all of the police that were allowed to be in the school at any time, would have to be involved, and anyone in the position of authority to make that happen, “must” be involved.

          If this could be the real situation, we as a society are in seriously
          “BIG” trouble.

          The good news, is that the “conspirators” are obviously far from infallible. As big as they are, this gang is nowhere close to being “too big to fail”. I am certain of that.

          As an example, they did not have enough control over the air to stop the helicopter news crew that captured the take down of Camo Pants Man in the bushes behind the school.

          The FACT that we are able to collectively work this puzzle out through professor Tracy’s web sight is another.

          I have said before, that the proof of “fraud” is in the redacted images and text.

          Now I am saying with certainty, that the proof of “conspiracy” is in the redacted images and text as well.

          We absolutely “need” to challenge the State for access to the redacted information.

          Are you ready for the trial of the century?

          Where can/do we go for “reliable” legal advice?

          They would need to b

        4. I believe as you do, Vivian, that this was a hoax and no shooter existed. I suppose I made it look there like I credited any of that story about shooters. I didn’t. My position that it had no shooter was only reinforced by the downloads of heavily “redacted” material in the school, framed by irrelevant footage of details that mean nothing to the story of a shooting. It is my opinion that “redacted” was a cover for nothing, blank. It’s a kind of shell game, three card monty, where the object is not actually under any of the “redacted” stuff. Only a fool would play that – but they line up on the sidewalk, don’t they?

        5. I agree that the Lanza’s (real people) played parts in the theatre of SHES. I question if Nancy and Adam are deceased. To fulfill their role in the theatre that did not need to die. However, for other reasons that may have needed to pass.

        6. Musings, I agree with you about the meaning of the word “redacted” in the SHS report. It’s just there to pretend that certain information is withheld.

          And did you see the article in the news this morning about a handcuffed teen killing himself?

        7. Vivian, I totally agree. While it’s fun to poke holes in the story (I do it myself!), it’s a hoax. Virtually nothing said about the key players can be trusted. Chasing various statements made about them is like chasing invisible fairies.

          My inclination (and it’s’ only that), is that “Adam” and “Nancy” were real people. If so, they are probably alive today. This thing IS a drill. The drill is not over yet. This is taking the drill “to the next level”.

          We do ourselves a disservice when we think small. This isn’t just about gun control. When we talk of conspiracy we should realize that this goes all the way to the “top”. The local yokels are just participants. My guess is that they would not be participants if they weren’t assured that they were totally protected.

          Some of us have ethics that would prevent us from participating in something like this no matter what the reward. Alas, others do not. As time goes on and society is further exposed to abject materialism I would expect the idea of personal ethics to all by vanish.

          I also think that many of the support characters did not realize what they were involved with. Some of the players may be comical but they have access to people who could be very dangerous. If this were not the case we would be hearing from more people who were close to this.

          This is by no means the first time this type of production has been perpetrated. It may be one of the most audacious. I think that is the uncompleted portion of the drill. They are going to push this as far and as hard as possible until they get where they intend to get. Only then will this fade from view like the others.

  8. Excellent compilation. There is another huge cover up that just played before our eyes – the judges order to release the 911 tapes was disregarded. The 911 team received awards for fielding 100s of calls, only 5 were released. While all the networks indicated they were too gruesome to run on the air, the truth is they were amazingly not. It is impossible to believe a person just shot in the foot would calmly call in, while too other adults are in the room not on the phone or helping her. “Keep pressure on it, ok? OK. OK bye bye, Ok bye bye!”

  9. Deb Pisani said she locked her door in her official statement but she told the 911 operator her door was not locked. Book 5 Doc 00258013

  10. BREAKING NEWS- A boatload of Amish people just arrived in Newtown by bus. Apparently the bus was not towed by horses.

  11. thank you for keeping the lies & truth alive & persevering after these satanic liars in this forum, keep up the great work all of you, i will be sharing the truth on many many pages as always

  12. A landmark summary of what is a hoax – great work. Reading at the beginning, I see that Veronique Posner, one of the parents and the only one with an open coffin, who implicates thus Governor Malloy who sees it – sums up the rationale for SHES (at least the one we are supposed to accept): “the schools are so defenseless.” It’s a problem looking for a solution, as all of these drills have been.

    I would add that the grocery stores are defenseless, as are the polling booths, as are concerts in the park, as are playgrounds, as are crowds at the beach. And yet, massacres are not common are they? In Iraq, where we invaded and toppled a dictator who had been our puppet, massacres are as common as felafel trucks. Are they thinking, these planning malefactors of great wealth, that what goes around comes around? Is that what keeps them up nights planning the next fake terror attack to get us used to a globalized world that they control?

    I haven’t read all the way through this yet, but it seems that if the case against the Tsarnaev’s needed to made in order to have a fair trial for “Joker”, then the same level of standards in any criminal case would need to be applied, with contemporaneous evidence gathering of where exactly victims were when hit by a bomb (or are there different standards for bombings?), and each injury would need to be photographed not just covered in bandages, but in an interview with the victim (the equivalent of a rape victim’s bruises being photographed, no matter where those bruises may be) the whole evidence should have been shown, including emergency room reports, and the entire documentation of hospital data. The whole hospital records in other words. I am sure that a defense attorney worth his or her salt would require that this be reviewable to defend the client, because any discrepancy might be able to show someone else was involved. In this case, since the injuries were pre-existing or amputations performed due to scheduled amputations for disease or an injury received elsewhere, there is a mass of exculpatory evidence if “Joker” is even a real person (and the original’s classmates thought the kid in court wasn’t the one they knew, since their friend had no accent, having come to the US at an age when a child may still acquire the local accent).

    So this explanation may serve as a touchstone for examining the truth or falsity of other events. Many of us have already absorbed the mass of information required to dismiss the events, but public opinion can only shift if something can be bullet-pointed, and this is a beginning.

    1. Jim Fetzer, if I read his preamble correctly, seems fixated on Israel (call it Zionism, Judaism, all-powerful Jews, as you will). I am not so much inclined to defend Jews as to open up the conversation to many possibilities. They are myriad, complex, disturbing.

      Edward Bernays’ father was a devout Freemason, who tinkered with far-eastern religions. Swiss psychiatrist, Carl Jung (very influential in this new pseudoscience) was equally engaged by exotic believe systems such as the offshoot Christian sect, Coptic Orthodox. Jung broke with Freud with theories on the personal unconscious mind, apart from the collective unconscious mind. He was part of his era’s leap into the unknown which sought to scientifically pin down human psychology.

      It took no great thrust of imagination to realize the potential for mass social-engineering which enhanced profitability along commercial lines.
      Manipulating the masses is nothing new; it has just been perfected to an art by enterprising men and women of vision and self-promotion. These men invented the CFR, the UN and its branches of The World Bank and International Monitary Fund. On the other side of the ocean, we find The Tavistock Institute and The Max Planck Institute in Germany, all with an eye to bringing the entire globe into compliance. Russia has its own schemes, of course.

      I just offer these opinions up for group analysis. Martin Luther King said in reference to the Jewish issue, that when anyone spoke of Zionists, they were using a code word for the Jew. Dave Emory would have some issues with Jim Fetzer and I don’t find Emory any less credible than Dr. Fetzer. We all indulge in speculation. Some events are more transparent, to be sure: political assassinations, Sandy Hook, 9/11, The Boston Marathon bombing being among them.

      1. There was nothing in this summary that “seems fixated on Israel (call it Zionism, Judaism, all-powerful Jews, as you will).” It is a compilation of many truth seekers, regardless of their beliefs, this article in no way assesses blame to any group.

        1. I was replying in my comment to Amanda’s link to Northern Truthseekers blog. My impression was that Jim Fetzer wrote the opening statement, which IMO was decidedly anti-Jewish. But then his own site is replete with this kind of rhetoric. He is in good company, it appears…having researched for years on many issues, I found this trend to be sadly evident throughout the blogosphere. In response, it seemed only fair to dig into facts and perhaps set the record straight. Israel is between a rock and hard place, as the saying goes. Heads, she loses; tails she loses. Scapegoating has not been abolished by the Internet, rather it enhances some wrong-headed inititives to push a political point.

          I have jumped into any number of controversial issues, often coming down on the “wrong” side: OJ Simpson was set up; George Zimmerman was guilty of manslaughter; they executed the wrong man for OK City bombing; in 2000, the election was stollen by the Bushistas.. I am opposed to gun control and uncontrolled immigration.

          When a statement is made or a link provided, it opens up the debate and I feel it necessary to rebut, if needed, IMO. Feel free to disagree. That is called democracy. I believe I did support the summary above set down by the research team. No problem there.

      2. Awaiting my comment–under moderation–to be posted, I found this article at The Daily Beast to be interesting. Dr. Martin Luther King supported Israel’s right to exist and did equate casual negative comments against Zionism with anti-Semitism. Many Black ativists believed references to an apartheid Israeli state would dimenish their fight for Blacks in South Africa. There is nothing simple about human behavior, which is often conflicting and ambiguous.

        1. Did it ever occur that other countries are involved in the same venal race-specific bio weapon research? I can imagine some would love to release such a virus in Israel. (Or NYC) Can we just agree that we live in insane times and singling out the perps gets more and more dodgy by the day? I would hate to sit on that jury.

  13. Many questions about Sandy Hook are still unanswered such as:

    1. What was the coroner’s report on Adam Lanza’s time of death?

    2. What was the coroner’s report on Nancy Lanza’s time of death and any drugs found in her body?

    3. According to a USA Today report here (see: ), Peter Lanza earned $8,556 a week. He agreed to pay annual alimony in 2010 of $240,000 with increases each year. In 2012, Lanza paid his ex-wife $289,800. After 2016, Nancy Lanza would get annual cost-of-living increases based on the 2015 alimony payment of $298,000 a year until Peter Lanza retires. Peter Lanza agreed to maintain a $3 million life insurance policy with his ex-wife as the beneficiary.

    Peter had motive to see Nancy and Adam dead. Was he involved in a plot to murder them and use Sandy Hook to cover it up?

    4. Nancy must have had a life insurance policy on her own life. Who was the beneficiary?

    1. Point 3: Peter Lanza’s annual income about $430K – Alimony $290K = $140K before NJs and the Feds horrible taxes kick in….leaving him to live on about $70K per year, or less. Yikes! He doesn’t have enough left over to even hire a hitman with that low net income in North Jersey. He could barely afford gas and bridge tolls with that setup.

      1. John, from a financial perspective you’re not taking into consideration that spousal support (i.e., alimony) is tax deductible. Consider also he probably had investments and savings over the years as an upper echelon executive.

        But even still, your reasoning shows that Peter Lanza would have had a high level of motivation to do away with Nancy and Adam, especially since he re-married. You think his new wife would marry a divorced and financially destitute man, for love? Not on your life.

        I think those of us who will not relent on the Sandy Hook cover-up and have the investigative resources and time should follow the money and pursue evidence to convict Peter Lanza of conspiracy to commit premeditated murder.

        1. FVPatterson,

          Howdy! Nancy Lanza hadn’t changed her will after the divorce. Peter had a big life insurance policy w/Nancy as the beneficiary (this was part of the divorce deal). Now, I would imagine that Nancy was heavily insured because she was Adam’s primary caregiver…and if she died, that would leave Peter in a pickle since he’s a big executive with no time to follow Adam around…so, he’d have to hire help.

          I’d bet Peter has received a rather large insurance check as a result of the event. Yeah, and probably even more for going along with the “game”. Wonder if he ever went back to work. Saw his house went up for sale.

        2. Just to “have fun” with this, it seems they would BOTH have an interest in getting out of a burdensome settlement if someone came along with “terms” favorable to both.

          Suppose I could guarantee you a nice income and relieve your ex-husband of that debt? Maybe that’s why the original tale had him “dying” at his son’s hand. For some reason, perhaps they didn’t anticipate them storming over to Ryan’s and arresting him, they had to change the story.

          Both could spend happier days, he freed of debt and her sipping Mai Tai’s with Bab’s Olsen.

        3. That is a reasonable hypothesis LoPhatt. I am sensing that all Lanza’s are alive, well off and under new identities. A librarian, who knows the Champions turned the most intense beet red following my in person question- “so what’s really going on with the Nancy and Peter”. She smiled and almost giggled with a unusual persistent beet redness. Her lips were sealed on a direct answer, but she was willing and happy to point to other public access printed references which I have shared previously on this blog.

        4. fvpatterson,
          You’ve got to be kidding. OMG, that is most interesting. Let’s nab ’em and waterboard ’em until we get the truth. I’m kidding everyone, I would never condone kidnapping 🙂

        5. Hi Lophatt,
          I had some “fun” with that idea too. Did you see the video of Ryan Lanza leaving the police station (Google it and tell me what you think)? You’ll see Dad in the background as they are walking to the car (cops are protecting Ryan). OK, now Ryan gets in the backseat. Now briefly we see a good side view of a woman in the front seat. It doesn’t look like Pete Lanza’s new wife. Tell me who you think it looks like. I was like, “Whoa! Can it be?”

        6. Hi Terry,

          I’m going nuts trying to find the video link – I’ve been looking for 1/2 hr. I’ll keep looking. But here’s a link w/a still from the video…it’s the 4th picture down on the page. It’s at night. Peter’s hand is over Ryan…he was walking out of the police station a few feet from Ryan who was protected by the police officers. The woman in the passenger seat wasn’t pictured as getting out of the car (she’s a bit haggered looking w/glasses – I’m curious to know who she is. This still shot is not an attractive one of her – the video gives you a little more perspective…so I’m so anxious to find it.

          Sorry I’m having trouble finding the video. I thought it was on my favorites – as it got my attention.

        7. According to the UK mirror, there was no disposition of Adam Lanza’s body as of 12-23-12. The plan was for cremation and disposal in secrecy. Nancy Lanza was to be cremated as of the same date….only viewed by close family and friends. She was not claimed by Peter or Ryan as of the time of that article.

          Those two items alone could be placed in the Top Ten.

          I also concur that Peter, Nancy and Ryan are all together and alive as one happy and rich family.

        8. Beth, just a “stray thought” or two on Ryan at the police station. It definitely DOES look like the mysterious “Ms. N”. Remember back when all Ryan said on his Facebook (?) posts was angry about being accused? Well, wouldn’t he be shocked that his mother was dead? Would they have known that?

          How about, if they find a dead man (self inflicted or otherwise) with Ryan’s I.D., why would it be a major deal to rush over there and arrest him? He clearly didn’t do it.

          Then, after much ado about the dead father, missing girlfriend, and what have you, he just “disappears”. Much later we’re told that he inherited the house on Yogananda. Now, that’s uncertain.

          So, fast forward to the recent report. There are notes from Nancy, “clean Ryan’s room”. We assume that means he’s coming home for Christmas. Would there have been any correspondence between Peter and Ryan throughout this? Would that be of interest?

          As an example, apparently Ryan and Peter are much more “important” than a U.S. Congressman. Remember when Chandra Levy was killed? They hounded Gary Conditt (sp?) relentlessly. They didn’t seem overly concerned with the sensibilities of him.

          Now, I’m not suggesting that hounding people should be standard operating procedure, but they traditionally have been known to dig, especially when the “evidence” is a shaky as this has been.

          Nope, in this case there is one version, the State’s. Questions are not allowed and records are secret. The presumption is that the public has no say in matters like this.

        9. Lophatt – Hello! Thanks for checking out that picture – it sure doesn’t look like Peter Lanza’s 2nd wife in the passenger seat. It doesn’t look like a police woman either. It looks oddly like a haggard N.Lanza. But you’d think she’d be in hiding if still alive.

          Supposedly, Ryan learned of the shooting of the shooter and his id at the scene + his mom’s death on the news at work. Must’ve been playing the radio at work? On the Internet while working? His first instinct is to run home on the bus? On the bus? I think the occasion called for a cab and an urgent call to Dad.

          So, while on the bus he posts, “ CNN, it wasn’t me!” Holy..if you or I were in this situation – would we respond a touch differently?

          Was he protecting his estranged mentally ill brother? Would a normal person say, “It may have been my ill brother,”? I don’t know. Maybe not. When he was put into the police car he sure didn’t look like a fellow who learned his mom was dead. Why would he be taken by police IN CUFFS if they already had the shooter? So, the cops show up 80 miles from the scene – and arrest him vs. asking him to come in for questioning (to help them)? It makes zero sense. Did they think Ryan was the second shooter? Surely that would be cleared up with the boss saying he was at work all morning. It’s like it was a diversion.

          Side note because I have to say this: What was up with the Lanza boys and their bazaar haircuts? Also, notice in this video and 19 seconds…see anything funny at the top of Ryan’s head? Is that a triangle? Hair loss? Hair dye error?

          I have a question in connection with Ryan’s ID? I can’t locate an actual statement that says it was on Adam’s body.

          I agree with you, Everyone in Sandy Hook “magic, happy land” seems too ready to forgive and forget…including the state police/FBI. Peter seems to have been treated w/kid gloves. Is part of the redacted report the results of going thru Peter’s computers, phones, etc.? Hmmm, yet the boyfriend of Nancy Lanza had his phone combed thru and the contents transferred to forensics.What’s up with that? Why hasn’t the media dug up some stuff on him – including his failure to parent? Why? Because the media has apparently been told it is a non-story.

          With regard to your mention of Nancy planning to clean Ryan’s room – yep, could be that he was finally coming home for Christmas (he’d stated that he’d not seen is brother since 2010…so apparently he lived 80 miles away and never visited his mom’s house since then?). Alternatively, maybe in anticipation of putting the house up for sale, she was going to box up some things in Ryan’s former room. Just a thought.

        10. Beth, thanks for the response. After I wrote that there was a link posted here with an alternate theory that had Peter and Ryan as the key players. It had Peter and Nancy showing up at the police station. That is entirely plausible.

          It is also entirely plausible that NONE of this “happened”. What I mean is that Peter, Ryan, Nancy and (maybe) “Adam”, were asked to participate in a drill scenario. The script started out one way, and they decided to change it at some point.

          It makes absolutely NO sense to me that they would cuff Ryan under the circumstances. Of course that “scene” could have been shot earlier (or later) in a totally different context.

          In fact, this “changing the script” could be the central problem with their story. Maybe they had plans to tell a tale that hung together. Someone higher up, say Holder’s office, decided to change the script to better support their agenda. Things got a little “mixed up”.

          I could definitely see that. Maybe it started life as a tale of Ryan killing his dad and kidnapping his girlfriend. Someone says, “hey, it would be much more dramatic if it happened in a school…….”. They already had drill footage “in the can” from earlier drills and would only need to supplement those and green screen the rest.

          It’s just a “thought experiment”. The more we look at it the less it makes sense, as a whole. There have been a series of these “minor” actions all over the country (and world). Maybe this started out as a minor one and somebody decided to “grow” it.

          If I gathered a number of people willing to play act in a drill and asked them to read certain parts, I would have all my background to splice up a film. As hard as that may be to believe, I know that some information out there about 9-11 follows this pattern.

          There’s a guy who made some very good videos of his investigation into the Pentagon “plane”. In one segment he was interviewing the cab driver who’s cab was supposedly hit by the light pole. From all the evidence that was impossible.

          He had given interviews to that effect, that his cab was hit and people had helped remove the pole, etc.. They even drove him to his property where the cab is. There were no dents, just a broken windshield.

          One the way back to his house they pushed him pretty hard about his story. He kept making allusions to “I’m just a little guy”, etc.. Finally, he asked them to turn off the video camera. They turned off the picture but had the audio on. You can hear him admit that his wife worked for the FBI and they had approached him about what to say. He had a choice of cooperating or they would ruin him and his wife.

          So, to expand on that idea, what if you read your lines and were later surprised by how all this played out? But you received a visit from the “men in black”, who made you an offer you couldn’t refuse?

          Who knows? And, yes, Ryan has mange.

        11. Hi Lophatt,

          Wow – that taxi driver story dropped my jaw! Insanity! Thank you so much for sharing that!!

          I like your theories about how the stories may have come together. It does seem as though the plot lines were a bit…well, fluid.

  14. Hello everybody, think I found a huge lead on this- Hope everyone is doing well.

    I have been looking more into some of the “details” of the Sandy Hook Final Report video from inside the alleged Lanza House and hit on something which I think could be huge.

    The AAA Card shown at 4:40:17 in the video compilation I uploaded here: See what that says? Connecticut Motor Club.

    Read that? It says Connecticut Motor Club- Uses a club code of 240- Only problem with that is, as far as I can tell there is no card labelled “Connecticut Motor Club” ever used in circulation for AAA. Fairfield County is grouped into the “Southern New England AAA” and there is no “Connecticut Motor Club AAA” Card in existence as far as I can tell.

    We’re dealing with Club code 240 on the alleged “Connecticut Motor Club” card Ryan alleged belonged to- if you do a search for AAA club 240 It comes up with Southern New England.. if you look at the Wiki here: you will see there are Two AAA Clubs that cover Connecticut- One is AAA Allied Group (Greater Hartford Area).. and the other is AAA Southern New England- which includes Fairfield County (which is where Newtown is).

    There doesn’t appear to be any “Connecticut Motor Club” AAA Card issued in existence ever- it is grouped into Southern New England, the card appears to be completely fake, and it should be easy enough to find out if in fact AAA ever issued a Connecticut Motor Club card, if not, we have total proof of a hoax here via forged documentation.

    -ThePaulstalService out… help researching this would be appreciated. Keep up the good work all.

    1. I looked up AAA Connecticut Motor Club and found one located at 2276 Whitney Ave., Hampden, CT, which can be readily found on Google Maps. It appears to be a AAA. Not sure this card is bogus, but perhaps the subscriber is. If you look at the sign on the photo at the site, which is at a slight angle, it looks like it says “Connecticut Motor Club” like the card.

      1. I also did the same search, and did multiple image searches for a Connecticut Motor Club AAA Card, an no card exists, or has existed since ever. You get plenty of results for Southern New England, but not one image anywhere of a Connecticut Motor Club card.

        The “Connecticut Motor Club” Located in Hamden also uses the Southern New England Card, as is shown here:

        There is also a YouTube video called “Connecticut Motor Club AAA” but the video is actually for a different company.. why the misleading title?

        I’m going to keep looking into this, might make a few phonecalls to the Danbury AAA office and others to ask what it actually says on their cards and whether a Connecticut Motor Club Card exists- because from all the digging I have done so far, it apparently does not.

        1. If you can find an AAA card for Adam, that would be something. If it is from the same time as Ryan 2009-2010, it would show complete fraud, as Adam would have been 17 and still a minor…they do not issue anyone under 18 a card.

    2. In the Shannon Hicks picture of the kids in line, do you know if anyone have checked if the cars are all in the same place as in helicopter footage from the 14th?

      1. The hicks photo seems to have the same cars as the overhead photo with the black car in front of the entry, taped off etc. Roughly.

        However, if Google Maps is correct when it comes to orientation, shadows say that the hicks photo is taken around or slightly after noon(!) because the shadows point north (12.30-ish) while the overhead photo has very long shadows that point east. I’m not very good at this but my uneducated guess says at least 16.00 or later.
        Were kids still evacuating from the school at noon!?

        Now, they might have been photographed on the same day. But was that the day of? I know the Lanza (Rodia) car is there taped off, but that could have been done on some other day as well. Maybe on a day when the Rodia script sounded the best, and when it was later discarded on the 14th, they had to keep the car (because honestly the car does NOT fit the official story.)

        1. Theresa,

          There’s a fellow that has done several detailed shadow time analyses on the key photos and posted them on youtube. In his examination of the Hicks photo, he places the time at 9:47AM, give or take a few minutes. Here it is:

        2. Really? That’s interesting. I just assumed that the orientation for the school and parking lot on google maps would be north up, and then the shadows would be pointing north at 12. But I guess i’m mistaken somehow…

        3. They could have shot that at any time. It doesn’t prove a thing. They DID conduct drills there. Out of 400+ students this is the only thing we’re shown?

    3. I think it is just an old card.
      If Ryan hadn’t had contact with Adam since 2010, the card might be even older than that.
      I get info on a AAA Connecticut Motor Club.

  15. We cannot give one iota in regard to allowing the bastards to continue with their hoax drills.

    We must make it impossible for them to even consider attempting to try doing so again.

  16. Birtram – Watched that video with the flashing everyone must check in sign on live tv. Wonder why Fox news would ‘video shop’ a flashing everyone must check in on live tv?

    1. Kathy I wonder that too.. I think it was real.. I assume they wanted viewers to think about it.. giving clues.. dropping messages, it was mentioned eslwhere that these signs are used when they have drills for the active participents to sign in..

      1. That’s a good question. It might help to consider who owns Fox news.
        This reminds me of the Robbie Parker whoops video appearing on MSM.
        Somebody in MSM wants us to know it’s a hoax, and this is just a guess, but I think at some point the fact that it is a hoax is going to be used against somebody or some group, or maybe just to usher in a “new” ruler.

        1. The fact that Fox aired the “everyone must check in” sign and a news helicopter caught the capture of the “camo pants man” simply points out the reality of the limits and the incompetency of the conspirators.

          Everyone that works for the MSM is not in on the conspiracy. If they were, the Guardian would never have given Snowden his opportunity to tell us that the NSA is spying on the entire planet, including America.

          These conspirators make mistakes, sometimes very big ones. They also have overall control of the MSM, so they “correct their mistakes” as best they can by editing future news coverage to make their mistakes disappear from history.

          The best example of this can be seen in the post 9-11 coverage of WTC-7. All the major news station cameras aired the collapse live, none of them have ever aired it since.

          Try and find mention of WTC-7 in any of the post 9-11 news coverage. Its almost non existent.

          Try and find mention of WTC-7 in the “final” 9-11 Commission Report to Congress. It is “totally” non existent.

          I am satisfied that there is enough evidence of fore knowledge of this SHS event by several groups and individuals for a reasonable conspiracy case to be made right now. The ultimate proof of conspiracy and fraud will be found in the redacted information.

          The common goal for all of us, should be to the challenge the State into releasing that redacted information to us.

          What we need now, is reliable legal council on how to get it.

        2. Terry, I disagree, but of course there is no way to prove it. Maybe all MSM isn’t in on it, but I would bet my bottom dollar that Fox news is.

          I thought we came to a semi-conclusion here that the Snowden leaks are a type of fraud, too???

          Knowing how huge the machinery is behind this event, I don’t think that anyone in their right mind would take it on. Would you volunteer a relative?

          I sincerely doubt that the redacted material contains any good information. I even doubt that there is redacted material. I think they just used that word to leave blanks in the story.

        3. The mainstream media being in on it, does not necessarily mean there won’t be mistakes. It does not mean that everyone who works in MSM knows the overall plan for this – quite the opposite! The very strict compartmentalisation is very needed. Most reporters and journalists are trying their best to do a good job given the tools they have at hand. OK, sometimes they just have to get the story first, never mind how wrong they got it. And they work under time constraints and censorship from their sponsors. But very few people actually know what’s really happening. They go out to do interviews, write stories, check facts, discover things,have scoops, rush blushing to their editors saying they have the story of the year, only to find it in the “round archive” very soon. Sometimes they become frustrated, sometimes they just adjust. Some quit and get other jobs.

          A lot of things go through the security check. Once. Like the stories on the put options on 911. Or John Doe #2 in OKC. But only once. Then they are scrubbed and strongly discouraged in the future. And thus they don’t spread.

          But I agree, the “everyone must sign in” and Parkers giggle do seem planted for a reason. maybe it’s Cass Sunsteins plot to embarrass trapped truthers in some weird way. I just don’t see how they would work that.

        4. Great observation about WTC-7 getting out, and then being suppressed in all further discussions in MSM. It doesn’t seem to have rated any interest either on the part of the 9/11 Commission (which in asserting primacy in the description of the event, needed to erase that very strong impression if they could of controlled demo.) So yes, they edit. They have that power. News can leak through sometimes, but then it is post-event edited, wiped out of history like some of Stalin’s rivals when he rubbed them out and needed historic pictures of himself – he just airbrushed the “non-persons”. This is what totalitarian regimes do. I think we are missing a good thing if we don’t start making these historical parallels to how information was controlled and bowdlerized so that some agenda of government could go forward.

          I imagine the next big event will involve a sports event and some Chechens for hire. Waddya think? History will probably repeat itself when Socho becomes Boston (only perhaps this time for real)? Stay tuned. I but speculate, having absolutely no foreknowledge, only a sense that we Americans needed to be told that Chechens were badass and ruthless terrorists. Now that we have received this lesson, all hell may break loose on that country harboring — who? Snowden.

        5. Yes indeed. This just illustrates a point we were all taught in school. In a “democracy” it is essential to know what your parasites are up to. If business, high-finance and “government” become as one, you only “know” what you see on TEE VEE.

          It is astonishing how few people know about WTC-7 (or Six) for that matter. Of course they all dutifully watched what was aired and that was that.

          My pet theory is that if all their advertisers dried up tomorrow, the government would still finance the whole thing. It’s too important a tool to let die.

        6. All, there is empowering and awakening news for MainStreamMedia addicts…A Three Step Program?
          “We admitted we were numbed by MSM and that our reality was managed by MSM”
          “We came to believe that a Power greater than MSM could restore our mental equilibrium”
          “We stopped paying MSM”

      2. As we all know, the news is controlled. In an event such as this, they are given the script to read and interviews are arranged with the actors. Actually being there would probably give a reasonable person, such as the camera man, an inkling that it was not real. and he did what he could to tell the truth. Hope he is still alive!

        1. Kathy, good point. That’s one of the reasons for using drills. They can control WHO is allowed in there and who gets to take pictures.

  17. Truth Rises, Once Again

    Absolutely brilliant, magnificent collection of evidence for this blog-article. Congratulations.

    This article was most excellent collection of particular pt.s in a powerful inductive argument, all of which over-whelmingly works for the conclusion that the episode was an amazing fraud perpetrated upon the people–of course, it’s irrefutable. I remember what did it for me was the Dr. Wayne Carver vid in which the guy clowns, jokes, and smiles through it all.

    Now then, the pursuit of the conspirators who perpetrated this incredible hoax will continue w. even greater impetus. The Boston Marathon bombing a few months later was simply further confirmation of the criminal government’s desperation to maintain its lies about “terror.”

    And when u consider the HOW the Sandy Hook event was all brought-about and then done, u see w. ease the DRILL-culture and -mentality was well-practiced for years and years and years, becoming evermore elaborate, and then they decided, HEY, why not?–let’s just stage a totally fake event, not merely another boring drill, including the mass-media and politicians pushing it all, in earnest, and with due intensity, by golly.

    They knew (a) MOST people would be stunned just at the enormity of the production, (b) they had all their cohorts in PERFECT synchrony and coordination. (c) The nay-sayers and patriots would be caught much flat-footed and would need time to observe and analyze the actual facts.

    And observe: NO EXPENSE WAS SPARED–and this is actually easy w. the US Federal Reserve Bank (legalized) COUNTERFEIT scam, so capable of spitting out nearly un-limited funding to finance it all–ck,, and for expo/ref. on the Fed fraud.

    Thus it’s demonstrated once again: when u control the money and banking, u own and control EVERYTHING, for practical purposes–even the people who are wise (like Ron Paul) to the scam have to fear assassination if they get too poignant for their criticisms. Thank goodness for the still free Internet–which is next thing the powers have to destroy and/or control.

  18. One more item to add to #7 above (inappropriate behavior).

    This MSNBC interview with Monsignor Weiss:

    Then, during the interview, something strange occurred as Monsignor Weiss began to laugh and giggle on the phone while discussing this grave situation. He was asked how things happened at his school.

    Monsignor Weiss: “We were located…we were notified through the alarm system that’s in our town through the school system,”
    Monsignor Weiss began. “Our children were actually at mass so we kept them in church for quite a while and then sent them over to our hall where they are still in one group.
    So now…we are just awaiting…word from the officials on what we should do from here. I’m more concerned about the…the…

    MSNBC: “Monsignor…”

    Monsignor Weiss: “(laughter)”

    MSNBC: “Monsignor…?”

    Monsignor Weiss: “…(laughter)…more concerned about the parents waiting to find out what happened to their children (stifling laughter).”

      1. Thanks Kathy, So because of his criminal/shady past, the Monsignor met the job requirements to participate in the SHE game. We need a clergyman to act the role of guardian of students with heavenly authority. Anyone have any candidates? Monsignor Kevin Wallin!

    1. Pastor Weiss at 1:19, describing what news media and authorities assert was the worst school shooting in US history:

      “I noticed this morning when the children were being dismissed [sic] some of them wanted to go home but they were conflicted because they didn’t want to leave their friends. Y’know, they were really conflicted this morning about whether to leave or not. Y’know, they wanted to just be together. And yet, y’know, their parents were here to take them home.”

      1. As I listened, it seemed he went on and on too long, and that his level of detachment was the way you would feel for fictional characters, because a priest is always under an obligation to keep things confidential unless released to do so by the people he serves. And here he is being oddly off-key in my eyes. How do we know he is a priest? If so, did his superiors allow him to participate in this drill?

      2. The Magic Firehouse

        “There was sobbing, there was yelling, there was people throwing themselves on the floor, and… and absolute upsetment [sic]… uh, it was a whole range of emotions and there were people, ya know who were hugging each other, settling down… and then it would come back to them again and ya know, you’d hear an outburst periodic (fade), but it was very, very heavy emotion.”

        And there you have it. Monsignor Weiss had actually done us a favor. Here we all are looking for streaming tears, bloodshot eyes, people wailing and falling to their knees because they’ve just learned their young flesh and blood have been torn from their bosoms, some finding momentary comfort and consultation in the arms of another and then breaking down again and again. Clearly, the Hockleys, McDonnells, Pozner, Parkers, et al. left it ALL in the firehouse only to emerge hours later apparently purged of any semblance of the usual all consuming grief and indescribable pain experienced by those parents who have just had their young son/daughter tragically slaughtered.

        Found this on a help site for newly bereaved parents:

        Some of the things you may experience or feel are:

        A profound longing and emptiness.
        Wanting to die. This feeling usually passes in time; for eventually you will realize that you must go on for the sake of remaining family members, yourself and your child who died.
        Profound sadness.
        Crying all the time or at unexpected times.
        Inability to concentrate on anything, frequently misplacing items.
        Wondering “Why???”
        Questioning yourself over and over: “IF only I had….?” “Why didn’t I…?”
        Placing unnecessary guilt on yourself or others.
        Anger with yourself, family members, God, the doctor and even your child for dying.
        Fearing that you are going crazy! (very normal)
        Great physical exhaustion. Grief is hard work and consumes much energy!
        Difficulty sleeping or sleeping all the time to avoid the pain.
        Physical symptoms such as heaviness in your chest or having difficulty breathing (if these feelings persist see your physician) tightness in your throat, yawning, sighing, gasping or even hyperventilating.
        Lack of appetite or over eating.
        Weight gain or weight loss.
        Anxiety. (Often associated with overprotective behavior toward surviving children and other family members.)
        Denial of your loss, thinking that your child will return. (Denial can be effectively treated by spiritual leaders as well as psychologists. Seek help if your denial phase persists beyond a month.)
        Needing to tell and retell the story of your child’s death.
        Inability to function in your job.
        Sensing your child’s presence or an odor or touch associated with your child.
        Having difficulty grocery shopping because of seeing your child’s favorite food(s) on the shelves.
        Irrationally upset with yourself if you smile or laugh, thinking how can I smile, my child is dead? (Your child will want your life to be as good and as happy as possible in spite of death’s intervention.)
        Feelings as if your spouse or other family members don’t understand your grief or are not grieving as you think they should. Remember everyone grieves differently.
        Losing old friends who don’t seem to understand your pain and grief.
        Making new friends through support groups with members who have also experienced the death of a child and therefore understand your feelings.
        Feeling like you are making progress in your grief work, then slip back into the old feelings. Grief work usually is a succession of two steps forward and one step back over a long period of time.
        Becoming very frustrated with others who expect you to be “over this” in a month, six months or a year and who say so. Or even being frustrated with yourself for expecting to be “over this” too soon.
        Grief work from the death of your child is a slow process. Be patient with yourself.

        1. Thanks for that. I never lost a child of mine, but having lost a favorite dog, I can tell you it was two weeks of agony for our whole family when she was hit by a car (and waited for us to come to her before she gave up and died). We all appeared to have suffered worse than people at SHES. My daughter burst into tears and wailed for hours (she was about 12). All of us went around kicking the ground for days and wishing we could turn back the clock and lock the cellar door.

          A “drill” like this is part of the thing which teaches Americans that their real emotions are abnormal or crazy or need medications. So in that sense it promotes the pharmaceutical industry, doesn’t it? SHEESH is what I call it.

        2. Anyone who believes the official story is on psychotropic drugs. There are lots of them in the good ole USA. Grief is very bad, and real and you never get completely over it.

        3. Sorry about your dog. Ours passed just before Christmas. Agree with you on the misery. We couldn’t even have Christmas…we were all so upset. If I lost a child, I know I would have to go on for the other children – but I can’t even imagine the agony…I’d have to be medicated for a long time, I think.

        4. I’m so sorry to hear about your dog, musings.
          And I like your name for the hoax, SHEESH! That word will have a new meaning for me.

    2. Do you have a link handy to that interview or might someone have caught it on video? I’d like to see that. I can’t seem to locate anything other than mentions of the event (probably was scrubbed).

      Sounds like the two guys yuckin’ it up before a broadcast at the Navy Yard shooting. Thank you !!

  19. Paulstal,

    Simply put, Birtram like to try to create chaos… don’t pay him any mind. (He, in fact, seeks attention. If no one responds to him, he will fade away.) And Paulstal…. thanks for all your work and effort.

    1. I agree, this is a very important and useful post by Tracy et al. I would recommend they put out a book and peddle it on Amazon! There are now a few titles there on this topic, but there needs to be a book there challenging the MSM narrative.

  20. I’m still wondering about the “twelve survivors’ mentioned in the report. If that were the case, virtually every report on this event is in error. This compilation fails to mention them.

    If that were true, there certainly would have been activity in transporting them from the school. In theory those tarps would have gotten some use. Releasing footage of that would lend credibility to their tale.

    Were these hapless souls cut out of the spoils? Where do they fit into the narrative? Why would Dr. Carver not mention this? How about hospital personnel who allegedly treated them?

    They either left in “all terrain” ambulances or by invisible helicopters.

    One other interesting addition is the news that a contractor came, boarded up the crime scene, and moved articles to Chalk Hill School. In that piece there is mention of “clean up”. There is also mention of “horrible sights”, etc..

    So in this scenario, they allow a construction contractor and movers into the school with a biohazard crew simultaneously? Meanwhile, other “volunteers” help with the move. All one big happy family tromping through a crime scene and a contaminated site. That’s as unlikely as cuffs on a dead man.

  21. Our favorite tireless You Tube investigator, namesnotmary is on to something huge. She found two properties owned by Pat Llodra. (As first-selectwoman, Llodra is the highest ranking person in Newtown. She was a former school principle – and long-term resident of Newtown.)

    A background check of one of her properties shows a recent change to the address and info, BUT the map locates it at 36 Yogananda St.

    Mary is continuing to dig. C’mon Mary and any locals who can find old property and residence info.

    1. Well they can tell Pat that she has some pretty crappy furniture, and her house looks like a foreclosed property and she shops for clothes at goodwill in the ghetto.

    2. I hope this isn’t the same ‘Mary’ from YouTube who claimed to have an inside connection to Newtown is it?

      1. Namesnot Mary”s trouble with the “insider” was almost 8 months ago, and it was a well played attack on all honest inquiry. Since then she’s done incredible research, and her discoveries are consistently eye-opening.

        1. I wouldn’t second anything. I warned her numerous times that she was being duped, along with many other of her followers doing the same.

    3. Re: Pat Llorda, elected (into office as Newtown’s version of a “mayor” in 2009 (a former school principal, interestingly enough).

      Ah, she loudly called for the firing of our friend, Professor James Tracy. Interesting to do some research on her (other than a fed tax lien in ’05).

      PLEASE keep us posted on what you find. Hopefully it isn’t just that she owned the Bennett Farm’s land that was later developed and became the streets of Yogananda, etc.

      Has had some political pay-off for Pat (of course she said she was not interested)…

      From Newtown to Congress for Llodra? (Also name was floated for Lt. Governor)

      1. Sometimes “paybacks” and “payoffs” are via beneficial relationships.

        Perhaps that’s why RML Inc.seems to be doing quite well (Owned by Llorda’s husband – believe she is company’s VP) had some nice business deals of late:

        Dupont Tate & Lyle partners with RML, Inc. – for new product development, May 2013,

        Pat and Robert Llorda have a son, Michael, listed in a bio on her as living in Manhattan…so, bet this is him (from JP to Wells Fargo troubles) – Former head of collateralized debt obligations backed by asset-backed securities…related to the HUGE housing crisis SCANDAL, of course.

        Daughter, Sharon (worked at Dad’s company) passed away after a short illness-

        Daughter, Bethany Gillman, Was a teacher. Now director at Dad’s company. Ran & won for Trumbull town council (District 4).

Comments are closed.