Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook Was an Elaborate Hoax 955

Updated February 11, 2014 [Video]

By Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm, James Tracy, Jim Fetzer and the Sandy Hook Research Group

“[T]he names and ‘contextually identifying information of involved children’ were withheld, including descriptions of the children, their clothing and their belongings”–Reuben F. Bradford, Commissioner, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection

Everyone must check inThe New York Times, our nation’s newspaper of record (which records the “official history” of the United States), has reported that, with its “final report,” the criminal investigation of Sandy Hook by the State of Connecticut is over. 

Remarkably, the report does not even include the names, the ages or the sex of the alleged victims of the shooting. There is no actual identification of any of the dead. Even the Danbury, CT, Newstimes found it unsatisfying.

Even the 52 “autopsy photos” that accompany the report are redacted. The Times itself appears to be responsible for a stunning display of journalistic incompetence on a matter of enormous public concern. 

Anyone with the inclination can comb through hundreds of years of American crime reports and will not find an instance in the which the names, the ages or the sex of the victims is not given–with the exception of victims of sex crimes.  Withholding this information is part of a pattern of deception and deceit that extends to the Clerk of Newtown making secret arrangements with the state legislature to avoid releasing death certificates to the public, attempts to withhold the 911 calls and gag orders imposed upon those responsible for tearing down the building itself:

In a letter accompanying the report, Reuben F. Bradford, the commissioner of the state’s Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, said the names and “contextually identifying information of involved children” were withheld, including descriptions of the children, their clothing and their belongings. “All visual images depicting the deceased have been withheld,” he added, “as well as written descriptions whose disclosure would be highly offensive to a reasonable person and would violate the constitutional rights of the families.”

The commissioner said that balancing the “often competing interests of government transparency and individual privacy has been difficult,” but the situation is completely absurd.  This appears to be only the latest in a series of obscene measures being adopted to conceal from the public that the Sandy Hook “massacre” was in fact an elaborately staged hoax, which no one who takes a serious look at the evidence can reasonably deny because, in view of what we have now proven about the event, no alternative explanation is reasonable.

The basic principle that applies here is inference to the best explanation. Consider the totality of the evidence in this case.  Is the evidence more probable on the hypothesis that Sandy Hook was a real event or that it was instead an exercise (or a “drill”) , which was presented as though it had been a real event?  The hypothesis that confers the highest probability on the evidence is the preferable, which, when the evidence has “settled down,” is acceptable as true in the tentative and fallible fashion of science. Here are the “top ten” reasons that support the conclusion that Sandy Hook was staged and not real, where no children or adults appear to have died there.

1. Proof of death has been suppressed

UntitledTwenty-eight people allegedly died: 27 children and adults, including Adam Lanza,  at the school, and his mother, Nancy Lanza, in her home at 36 Yogananda Street, Newtown. However, there is no direct proof of their death: no photographic evidence or video footage was released to confirm the official story that these 28 persons actually died. In fact, no video surveillance footage shows anything—not even Adam shooting out the front plate-glass window or walking through the halls like Rambo, even though this is a school that had updated its security system at the start of the 2012-13 academic year.

The best the authorities could come up with was a heavily redacted report that includes numerous photos of the inside of the school, with a few dings that look like bullet holes, several bullets on the floor, and many black images with white numbers, which we are supposed to associate with dead people. One photo (left) shows the blown-out glass window through which Adam Lanza presumably entered the premises. But how did he get past the furniture, with all his weaponry, without moving anything out of position?

Compounding the situation, the parents were not even allowed to view their children’s bodies to identify them. Instead, they were reportedly shown photographs of the deceased. This was done, according to the Medical Examiner, Wayne Carver, in order to “control the situation.” But what was there about the situation that required “control”? No parent of our acquaintance would have agreed to accept the death of a child without viewing the body. James Tracy has published a discussion of the medical examiner’s performance.  According to Carver:

Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We have, uh, uh—it’s easier on the families when you do that. Un, there is, uh, a time and place for the up close and personal in the grieving process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be best to do it this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a situation depending on the photographer, and I have very good photographers. Uh, but uh—

Remarkably, the state has done its best to avoid releasing the death certificates and even recordings of the 911 calls. Death certificates were eventually “released” but not to the public or those who might want to investigate the case further, where only a short, general summary was available. According to The New York Times, in relation to the 911 calls, “no children are identified by name, no callers indicate that they can see a child being shot, and the only injury described is that of an educator’s being shot in the foot.”

Moreover, the funerals were all “closed casket,” with one exception—that of Noah Pozner. As recounted in interviews with the families, the circumstances of their last encounters with their children (or with their caskets) are strange to say the least. The “love fest” at the white coffin of Grace McDonnell was detailed on CNN for Anderson Cooper:

YouTube Video

Veronique Pozner gave her account of her last look at her son Noah to the Jewish Daily Forward on 26 December 2013.

Veronique asked the medical examiners not to autopsy her son; she felt that his body had suffered too many indignities. At his funeral, Noah was dressed in a suit and tie. A Jewish friend of Veronique’s at work enjoined Rabbi Praver to allow him to be wrapped in a blue tallis, even though he had not yet had a bar mitzvah.The family placed stuffed animals, a blanket and letters to Noah into the casket. Lastly, Veronique put a clear plastic rock with a white angel inside — an “angel stone” — in his right hand. She asked the funeral director to place an identical one in his left, which was badly mangled.

Just before the ceremony, Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy came to the funeral home to pay his respects. Veronique took him by the arm and brought him to the casket. Noah’s famously long eyelashes — which she spoke about in her eulogy — rested lightly on his cheeks and a cloth covered the place where the lower half of his face had been. “I just needed it to be real for [the governor],” she says. “This was a live, warm, energetic little boy whose life was snuffed out in a fraction of a second because our schools are so defenseless.”

2. Emergency protocols were not followed

There is no evidence of any frantic effort to save lives or to remove bodies to hospitals; instead the scene outside the school looked calm and largely bloodless—with police and other personnel milling around casually and a severe shortage of dead or injured victims. One Sandy Hook researcher decided to call Lt. Paul Vance to ask who cleaned up the blood, which would have been considered to be a bio-hazard, and got the reply, “What blood?” Here is Jim Fetzer’s interview with Kelley from Tulsa on “The Real Deal” where she discusses this, which also includes several of the 911 calls.

Kelley was onto a real issue. Under the CT Medical Waste Tracking Act of 1988, a paper trail must kept by all parties involved in the clean up and must be tracked all the way to the incinerator with names and dates.

In a Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) like Sandy Hook, the proper protocol is START triage (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment) using tarps of different colors with the aim being to save lives and get the injured to the hospital for treatment.  Not even the black tarps for the dead were used, much less the red ones for those who needed immediate treatment.  As Sofia Smallstorm has documented, nothing at all like this occurred at Sandy Hook: the appropriate protocols were not followed:

YouTube Video

Sandy Hook Fire Chief Bill Halstead was ready to help the victims but could recall only two wounded people. A few survivors were reportedly taken to the hospital, but, oddly, these people were never interviewed. There were no first-hand accounts that proved anyone was killed or injured. Nonetheless, according to Lt. Vance, 18 children were pronounced dead at the scene, two children were removed to “an area hospital” and were pronounced dead at the hospital, and seven adults were pronounced dead at the scene, including the shooter (NBC).

No emergency vehicles were present at the school or even lined up in the fire lane for a rescue attempt—the parking lot was filled with parked cars, police cars and possibly media vehicles. Such rescue activity as occurred was centered, not on the school premises, but at the nearby Firehouse. Emergency vehicles at the Firehouse were jammed together impeding access to the school, in case anyone might have thought about attempting a rescue. The scene at the Firehouse was quite peculiar, with people milling around and circling through the building, walking out one door and into another, to give the impression of lots of people and lots of action:

YouTube Video

3. Drill protocols were followed instead

We are now living in a security state, and the school system is among its beneficiaries. While we used to have “fire drills” from time to time, we now have “lockdown drills” implemented by school districts, with some states requiring a set number of drills by law. Private security firms, which operate for profit, now conduct “crisis preparedness assessments” at the tax-payer’s expense.

Larger scenarios are also developed as active-shooter drills, in which local law enforcement can take part in storming a school in pursuit of an active-actor-shooter. One such plan available on the web is “Operation Closed Campus” developed in Iowa following guidance set forth by the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) of the US Department of Homeland Security.

According to protocol, everyone at the drill must check in, identification badges are issued to personnel and observers, and drinking water and restrooms are available. Personnel include the director, staff, controllers, evaluators, actors, media personnel and “players” (agency employees) both in uniforms and civilian clothes. This protocol appears to have been followed at Sandy Hook, where many participants wore ID/identification badges on lanyards, a huge check-in sign is visible and even Porta Potties are at the ready.

YouTube Video

An emergency preparedness drill took place on 14 December 2012, 9 AM to 4 PM/ET, in Bridgeport, CT, which is a 20 minute drive from Sandy Hook. The course was run by the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection/Emergency Management and Homeland Security, entitled “Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters.”

The Sandy Hook “shooting” appears to have been an Integrated Capstone Event (ICE), an exercise run by FEMA to coordinate federal, state and local emergency response teams in the case of a mass-casualty event. As such, it would have utilized actors and media partners to simulate a tragedy in order to train participants, and also in order to observe the reaction of the citizenry.

4. There was foreknowledge of the event

The Connecticut state emergency system was taken over long before the “massacre” occurred, with a frequency change implemented five hours in advance of the “shooting.” Normal police and EMS dispatch protocol, using the Alpha Phonetic System for communications between officers and dispatchers, was replaced with staged transmissions by non-trained personnel. 

In addition, tweets about the shooting began before it occurred, a tribute was apparently uploaded one month before the event, and web pages honoring the victims, including a Facebook page R.I.P. Victoria Soto, were established before they had “officially” died. 

YouTube Video

A Sandy Hook timeline has been reconstructed at, detailing major developments and highlighting the numerous inconsistencies in reports by the media.

5. There were contradictory reports about the weapons

According to initial reports in the media, weapons used in the shooting included four handguns recovered at the scene, the only guns taken into the school (NBC). Then an AR-15 was said to have been found in the trunk of Lanza’s car (NBC). Then it was reported that Lanza may have carried only two handguns and that a rifle was also found in the school (NBC).

Dr. Carver's bizarre presss conference

Wayne Carver, the Medical Examiner, said that all the victims were shot with the “long weapon.” Lt. Paul Vance then said that a Bushmaster AR-15 assault weapon with high capacity magazines was used “most of the time” and that Lanza was carrying “many high-capacity clips” for the weapon (Huffington Post).

In January 2013, Connecticut state police released a statement indicating that they had found four guns inside the school: a Bushmaster .223 caliber XM 15-E2S semi-automatic rifle with high capacity 30 round clips, a Glock 10-mm handgun and a Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun. They said they also found an Izhmash Canta-12 12-gauge shotgun in Lanza’s car (NBC).

This shotgun is also shown in a video aired on the night of 14 December 2013  by NBC. An evidence collection team and a policeman find the gun in the trunk of Lanza’s Honda Civic—the policeman handles the gun without gloves and ejects the ammunition on the spot. Some have seen two long guns in the trunk in the NBC video: the 12-gauge shotgun and the Bushmaster rifle.

YouTube Video

Lt. Vance then asserted that Lanza had killed all his victims with the .223-caliber semi-automatic rifle ( Regarding the confusion, Vance told reporters, “It’s all these conspiracy theorists that are trying to mucky up the waters.” Perhaps “The Top Prize for Fantastical Reporting” goes to Fox News, however, which announced that a 12-gauge shotgun along with two magazines containing 70 rounds of Winchester 12-gauge shotgun rounds had been found in the glove compartment of Adam Lanza’s Honda Civicthat’s right, in the glove compartment.

6. Adam Lanza cannot have done the shooting

Adam Lanza, reportedly a frail young man weighing 120 pounds with Asperger’s Syndrome, is said to have carried massive weaponry on his person when he shot his way into the Sandy Hook school and proceeded to kill 26 people and then himself. This after he supposedly killed his mother before driving to the school.

Adam Lanza

According to State’s Attorney Stephen Sedensky, Lanza killed his 26 victims with the Bushmaster .223-caliber rifle and then killed himself with his Glock 10-mm handgun. Lanza was also supposedly carrying three 30-round magazines for the Bushmaster as well as a Sig-Sauer 9 mm handgun (see above). The victims were shot multiple times each in a fusillade of bullets from these military-style weapons. In order to wreak this havoc, he fired more than 150 rounds, and he must have carried more rounds in addition. Lanza was reportedly found dead wearing a bulletproof vest and military-style clothing (AP).

As Mike Powers, a professional military investigator and ballistics expert, has observed, this young man of slight build could not have carried all these heavy, bulky weapons and ammunition on his person. Furthermore, since first responders were supposedly inside the school within seven minutes, there was not enough time for Lanza to have carried out the shooting as reported. In an interview with Joyce Riley, Powers states that Lanza could not have fired so many times continuously without destabilizing himself from the intense noise from the Bushmaster. As a novice, he could not have shot an AR-15 with such speed and accuracy, supposedly changing magazines 8-10 times without a stoppage.

According to Lt. Vance on the night of the shooting, one victim survived. So in less than seven minutes—or less than five minutes according to the media—Lanza killed 26 people and then himself, producing only one injured victim. This is a 96% kill ratio, which is unheard-of accuracy among the most experienced marksmen. Powers thinks the whole scenario is a physical impossibility. He is not even convinced that Adam Lanza was a real person. The story of the shooting should not be taken seriously.

YouTube Video

The final travesty involves the weapons and other paraphernalia that were allegedly found in the Lanza house. The “arsenal” supposedly included guns, Samurai swords, knives, a bayonet and more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition, according to search warrants released. Other items of interest were ear and eye protection, binoculars, holsters, manuals, paper targets, a military-style uniform and Lanza’s NRA certificate (Fox). Lanza had reportedly compiled a spreadsheet 7 feet long and 4 feet wide in 9-point type detailing 500 victims of other mass murders (CBS). We are supposed to believe this, and, at the same time, that Adam Lanza was a shy, quiet kid who didn’t like noise and chaos, as promoted by the PBS Frontline Special, “Raising Adam Lanza.”

7. Key participants displayed inappropriate behavior

There are many bizarre media reports and interviews of those associated with the “shooting.” Some examples:

Wayne Carver—Medical Examiner Wayne Carver’s surreal press conference is one of the most startling of all the media offerings. Widely available on youtube, this event shows H. Wayne Carver II, a public official of some standing, clowning and acting outlandish—grinning strangely, making irrelevant comments, and basically appearing unknowledgeable and unprofessional.

YouTube Video

Robbie Parker—Perhaps the most famous press conference is that of Robbie Parker, the alleged father of victim Emilie Parker, speaking on a CNN report of December 15, 2012. He chuckles as he walks up to the camera, then gets into character by hyperventilating, and finally feigns distress as he talks about his daughter—and about the fund set up to help raise money “for Emilie.”

YouTube Video

The families—In addition to Robbie and Alissa Parker, other parents and family members take their turn in the spotlight, including (but not limited to) Mark and Jackie Barden, Jimmy Greene and Nelba Marquez-Greene, Ian and Nicole Hockley, Neil Heslin (alleged father of Jesse Lewis), Chris and Lynn McDonnell, Veronique Pozner, Carlee Soto, and David and Francine Wheeler. Anderson Cooper is the interviewer in two notable instances: his conversation with the McDonnells mentioned above, and an interview with Veronique Pozner, remarkable for its green-screen effects such as Anderson’s disappearing nose.

YouTube Video

The school nurse—Numerous reports offer detailed and totally fictitious information, some of which was later abandoned in favor of more tenable versions. On the evening of December 14, a USA Today reporter said she had spoken with the school nurse, whom she had met on the street. The nurse told her that the gunman had come into her office, “they met eyes, she jumped under her desk,” and he walked out.  The nurse said that the gunman was the son of the kindergarten teacher, who was known to her and “an absolutely loving person.” It later developed that Nancy Lanza had not been a kindergarten teacher at all, and that neither Nancy nor Adam had any connection to Sandy Hook school whatsoever.

YouTube Video

Dawn Hochsprung—In an embarrassing fiction, The Newtown Bee reported on 14 December 2013  that Dawn Hochsprung, the Sandy Hook school principal, told the paper that a masked man had entered the school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots – more than she could count – that went “on and on.” Of course, Dawn Hochsprung was allegedly killed by Adam Lanza and so could not easily have provided this statement. In fact, Dawn was said to have acted heroically, dying while lunging at the gunman—although one wonders who witnessed and reported this act of heroism. On 17 December 2013, The Bee retracted the report and apologized:

An early online report from the scene at the December 14 shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School quoted a woman who identified herself to our reporter as the principal of the school. The woman was not the school’s principal, Dawn Hochsprung, who was killed in the Friday morning attack. The quote was removed from subsequent online versions of the story, but the original story did remain in our online archive for three days before being deleted. We apologize for whatever confusion this may have caused our readers and for any pain or anguish it may have caused the Hochsprung family.

Gene Rosen—Gene Rosen is one of the most prolific of the Sandy Hook media stars, giving animated and conflicting statements to a series of reporters (in English and Spanish). Considered a “good Samaritan” by the mainstream media, Gene supposedly harbored six children who ran away from the school, rode to his house on a school bus, sat down on his lawn and proceeded to cry and tell him that their teacher, Miss Soto, was dead. Strangely, Rosen took the children inside and gave them some toys to play with, instead of calling 911 like any normal person.

YouTube Video

The Gene Rosen videos are important for the official narrative, in that they corroborate many of its details: the staccato gunfire (and thus a semi-automatic weapon) and heresay evidence from the children (Lanza had a big gun and a little gun, Vicki Soto was killed, etc.).These incriminating videos are some of the best evidence that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax.

8. Photos at scene and of victims look staged or fake

The only photo we have seen of any children being evacuated from the school was apparently taken earlier in the fall during a drill (no coats, smiling faces). Shannon Hicks, a photographer for The Newtown Bee, took the photo and claims to have taken many others of the event—which have not been released.

Shannon Hicks

Hicks reportedly took this photo “as an associate editor” and then, when another editor arrived, “changed into her firefighting gear and tried to help.” The account was promoted by NPR.

Parker family

Perhaps more insidious are the photographs of the children who allegedly died at Sandy Hook, many of which are concoctions prepared on Photoshop. Some of the most problematic involve the Parker family, with Emilie’s red-and-black dress supposedly worn by her younger sister for the visit with Obama.

YouTube Video

The photograph of Victoria Soto’s class of students has been shown to be an elaborate composite:

YouTube Video

And many of the individual images of the children released to the media are peculiar—some look outdated and may be old photos.  In a very sloppy slip-up, a photo of a real child, Lily Gaubert (right, below), who is alive and well, was promoted in the media as an image of Allison Wyatt (left, below), an alleged victim. Lily’s mother discovered the error and made it public.

Allison Wyatt vs. Lily Gaubert

And the ridiculously fraudulent photographs of Adam Lanza clearly do not depict a real person:

YouTube Video

9. The crime scene was completely destroyed

As with Ground Zero after 9/11, Sandy Hook Elementary and all the evidence have been completely obliterated; $50 million in CT state funds were allocated for the demolition and rebuilding of Sandy Hook school. This would never have been tolerated if an actual crime had been committed—at least one that was meant to be investigated. The demolition of the school has now been declared complete.
Sandy Hook demolition

Employees who worked on the project were required to sign non-disclosure agreements. They were not only prohibited from removing anything from the site, but they were forbidden from discussing publicly anything they may have observed or not observed during the demolition, such as an absence of bullet marks on the walls or blood on the floor of the classrooms.

10. Deceased children sang at the Super Bowl

Recent research has resulted in a “Sandy Hoax Surprise,” a convincing youtube video identifying eight alleged Sandy Hook victims and six of their brothers singing in the Newtown children’s choir at the 2013 Super Bowl.

YouTube Video

One more victim has been identified since the original video, making a total of 15 out of the 21 children in the choir who were from the Sandy Hook “families.” The newly recognized “victims” are all older than they appear in their photos, giving credence to the theory that the children’s photographs were outdated images.

YouTube Video

The Newtown children, whoever they are, seem quite happy to be singing at the Super Bowl, smiling and running across the field after the event—giving no sign of the trauma they had been through less than two months prior. So are these children actually alive? One can only hope. 

Cui bono?

The evidence demonstrates (1) that proof of death has been suppressed, (2) that emergency protocols were not followed, (3) that drill protocols were followed, (4) that there was foreknowledge of the event, (5) that there was confusion over what weapons were used, (6) that the suspect cannot possibly have carried out the shooting as claimed, (7) that strange behavior was displayed by officials, witnesses and relatives, (8) that there are many odd photos of participants, (9) that the crime scene was destroyed under conditions of secrecy and (10) that some of the children appeared at the Super Bowl.

With the possible exception of (5) and (9), all of these features would have low probabilities had Sandy Hook been a massacre but high probabilities were it merely a drill.  Some of them are decisive by themselves, such as (1), (2), (3), (4) and (6)–not to mention (10).  EMTs cannot make determinations of whether a victim is dead or alive, so there should have been a surge of EMTs into the building to rush those little bodies off to hospitals where doctors could determine their condition.  But that was not done–and nothing else about this event supports the conclusion that it was real. On the contrary, virtually everything indicates that this was a drill.

Going in circles

The probability of the evidence on the hypothesis that this was a drill is overwhelmingly greater than on the hypothesis that it was an actual massacre. And the evidence appears to have “settled down” and point in the same direction. No alternative is reasonable, which means it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. So who did it and why? This is the final question. If the perpetrator had been Adam Lanza, then he had no apparent motive, as even “the final report” acknowledged.  When considering cui bono (who benefits), a large amount of money is at stake–and much of it has already been distributed.

Follow the Money

First of all, the construction industry got a boost, with the $50 million in Connecticut state funds allocated for the destruction of Sandy Hook School and to rebuild a new school on the premises. And this from a state with a projected budget deficit of $1.1 billion for the coming year.

The Sandy Hook School Support Fund has raised approximately $12 million and distributed it to the Newtown-Sandy Hook Community Foundation, overseen by Ken Feinberg, “a victim compensation master with a national reputation,” according to United Way Western Connecticut. And the Support Fund posted its condolences on 11 December 2013, which was three days before the actual event.

Premature announcements
The estimated payout was $281,000 paid to each of the victims’ families, who have raised additional funds from their own websites—some of which were apparently advertised on the web in advance of the shooting. At present, all of the victims, both children and adults, have memorial funds that are currently collecting money.

“Sandy Hook Promise,” which actively solicits money for family members and others “impacted by this tragedy,” as well as for lobbying for “mental wellness and gun safety,” currently boasts over 300,000 people who have made the “Sandy Hook Promise” to turn the “tragedy into a moment of transformation.”

The federal government has also forked over a lot of taxpayer money, including a $150,000 federal grant to Newtown to pay for two “school resource officers” (aka police), and $2.5 million in federal funds to compensate the local entities for their trouble: $663,444 to the Connecticut State Police, $602,293 to the town of Newtown, $882,812 to the town of Monroe and $296,838 to other partner agencies. This hush money is sure to keep the lid on things for now.

In addition, the Department of Education has awarded a total of $3.2 million to the Newtown Public School District under the Project SERV (School Emergency Response to Violence) to help with ongoing recovery efforts following the shooting. See these reports: US Department of Education awards 1.3 million grant; US Department of Education awards 1.9 million grant. This hush money is sure to keep the lid on things for now.

Gun Control

The families have been out in force, appearing on television and in print, lobbying for gun control in the states and the US capitol. By now, their stories are known to everyone in America. This has created an impression that the Sandy Hook hoax was about gun control. Meanwhile, however, the gun industry has benefited immensely.

Efforts to increase security in schools—and even arm teachers—are underway. The New York Times reports that around 1,500 state gun bills have been introduced since the time of the shooting, and 109 have become law. However, nearly two-thirds of these laws ease legal restrictions and support the rights of gun owners. 

This may well have been an unintentional consequence of an intentional plan. Nonetheless, it is not clear that the Sandy Hook event was carried out solely with the aim of disarming the American public. Perhaps we are seeing a kind of Homeland-Gladio—implementing a strategy of tension with real and simulated events. Remarkably, one of the earliest school safety/gun control proposals came from the family of Noah Pozner:

New Proposal from Noah Pozner family
Both the gun industry and the already immense and rapidly growing “security industry” have also benefitted from the Sandy Hook “shooting,” as we, the citizens of the United States, lose more of our Constitutional rights. A more subtle but nonetheless insidious effect relates to the promotion of mental health screening and the consequent medication of the “mentally unstable” in our society, based upon an event that did not take place, where President Obama has signed an on-going series of executive orders to implement a political agenda. For the latest, check this one out.

The emergence of the Department of Homeland Security as a major threat to democracy cannot go without comment. Even though a subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Intelligence released a report on 3 October 2012 establishing the virtual non-existence of domestic terrorist threats, DHS has acquired more than 2 billion rounds of .40 calibre hollow-point ammunition. Sandy Hook appears to be part of a complex and evolving scenario, beginning with 9/11, to establish an enhanced Police State. Whether or not it succeeds depends on public awareness and political action.

Vivian Lee, Ph.D., is a Sandy Hook researcher and professor at an East Coast University. Sofia Smallstorm is an independent researcher, who produced and directed “Unraveling Sandy Hook.” James Tracy, Ph.D., maintains a web site at And Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.

This article originally appeared at Veterans Today on January 8, 2014. Republished with permission.


    • Is this the one?

      Don’t recall who originally made it or ? Hope this is what you were looking for :)

  1. The “everyone must check in” picture and accompanying video is clearly photoshopped and tampered with

  2. Hmm…. I wonder, what ever happened to the guy who the co-conspirators shuffled off just minutes after the staged drill, who was wearing a military-type flack jacket and was recorded running from the seen of the drill-hoax (as seen on TV footage) and yelled “I had nothing to do with the shooting.” Where did he wind up, and why has no one ever been able to discuss what he must have seen, according to his own statements? It’s all too hokey. Sad. People are so apt to either defend the nonsense or attack the questioners. What ever happened to discernment?

    As I have said here before, “People can’t see the farce for the treason.”

  3. Why is Birtram allowed to post at all if he is a known troll ? Comments are moderated for this site. We certainly don’t need the distraction.

  4. Troll,


    You can’t even seem to formulate an intelligent sentence.

    Normally I don’t “feed” trolls.

    If you can read…check the links before you bother to comment. If you can read and comprehend, you’ll see the dates and values of the fund were different. The most current value puts it at over $11 million.

    Not trying to make anything “fit” here so you’re accusing me of something that doesn’t exist.

    Get a clue.
    Even better – get lost.

  5. I do agree with this observation that picking and choosing one’s “facts” from the reporting of the Mainstream Media is not logical when trying to prove, or disprove, the events of December 14th, 2012.

    The man chased into the woods and the alleged call made to Lt. Vance to pose the question of who cleaned-up the massacre which he reportedly replied “What blood?,” stand out as wobbly pillars when making a case regarding Sandy Hook.

    That said, there is an exponentially-high improbability factor that the Sandy Hook event took place as reported in the Network Media.

  6. Sorry for my typo. I’m sure you’ve never made any

    “Ad hominem” attacks are the most illogical of attacks

    I’ve read more than a library. I’m sure you’ll have a statement about that. In the meantime, I’ll go back to my book


  7. Thanks, it can get confusing (I suppose), I point these things out because it clearly creates problems with “THE STORY”. When we talk about some of this like it was real it can lead some to think that we believe something happened there.

    My objective in pointing out obvious holes is the hope that something incontrovertible will turn up. Obviously, you can’t have “26 victims” AND “38” (depending on whether they count the one who allegedly didn’t make it).

    It occurred to me that the State’s Attorney hasn’t been following the internet. They decided to just “put that out there” for some reason. What they have shown, beyond a doubt, is that the media will say anything they tell them to no matter how ridiculous.

    Having this construction/moving company, for example, in there within two days. Then they throw in the “volunteers”. After that they turn around and declare the whole thing “off limits” and very secretive.

    We are simply reduced to bystanders who have no right to question the majesty of “the Government”. Ultimately it is extremely insulting. On this site we have many (including me), who think this was all a staged drill. Some others are poking holes in “the story” but believe something happened. That sometimes leads to confusion.

    We have already uncovered a number of anomalies that would be impossible to explain in the context of the official story. I occasionally check the MSM just to see how they’re spinning this. So far, they have not deviated from their initial tale. They are still using it. That means the drill is not over.

    We’ve had several of these “events”. Most have faded from memory. This one is like raising on a busted flush. They have been challenged, big time, and the response has been to lie harder.

  8. If the media can say whatever they want, then the media is in on it. We can find out who owns the media. That should give a clue who is behind it all. Maybe not at the top, but closer to the top than the actors.
    Whoever is behind it apparently owns parts of our government, maybe all of it. Logically speaking, whoever owns the media, owns our government. We can’t totally figure out what’s going on, but maybe we can get a better picture of who’s doing it.

  9. Beth, of course not. It’s just more of my “stream of consciousness” babble. If someone isn’t a “regular” here it may be confusing. That’s all I was saying. It wasn’t aimed at you.

  10. lophatt said:

    “What they have shown, beyond a doubt, is that the media will say anything they tell them to no matter how ridiculous.”

    This, in my opinion, is by far the most important aspect of this case. It really should be the central focus of our analysis, because it is perhaps the chief object of the experiment: to test the completeness of control the secret government has over the public mind, by means of the press.

    lophatt then said:

    “the MSM just to see how they’re spinning this. So far, they have not deviated from their initial tale. They are still using it. That means the drill is not over.”

    Precisely. I am certain the trolls we have been plagued with of late have something to do with that. The secret government has been observing us. How many, they ask themselves, fall for the “gun control” meme? How many get stuck on the fake, planted evidence, like a “SWAT” actor or an anomalous van? And finally, how successful are those who make it all the way through the maze in persuading the public that it was all a circus?

    Violetta, I don’t think media corporations’ ownership is very revealing. For one thing, they are public corporations, which is to say they are “owned” by insurance companies and pension funds, for the most part. One exception would be FOX news’ largest outside shareholder, a Saudi prince who makes certain that moslem issues are treated with kid gloves over there.

    More than 90% of the media are owned by five conglomerates, and they coordinate the worldview they present amongst themselves. They manufacture reality on behalf of the secret government. Who is the secret government? Those fellows who throw the satanic parties depicted in Eyes Wide Shut. They are unnamed. Sidney Pollack revealed to Tom Cruise that he knew he’d crashed the party because HE WAS THERE. Of course, he was just a participant, so he was masked, so Tom couldn’t know that.

    The unseen coordinators of the New World Order use visible people, like David Rockefeller and Maurice Strong and Javier Solana (the equivalent of Sidney Pollack in the movie). If we know their names, they are not all the way on the inside.

    Someone commissioned a vast network of Deep Underground Military Bases, not just here but around the globe. Those people do not want to be known, and they don’t want us to know what they are for and what goes on inside them; they try to suppress even the fact that those facilities exist. But something of their plans can be gleaned by the behavior of the visible creatures they allow to be billionaires. They have eager servants with names like Rothschild, Solana, Soros, Strong and Gates who run the ball and take the flack for them; of course, if these creatures ever reveal what they know, as Kubrick did in that movie, they end up like Kubrick.

    Incidentally, it was heavily redacted before it was released, after Kubrick’s mysterious demise, but very revealing nevertheless–which is why it was subjected to a full court press to convince the public it was nothing more than a shabby picture about an orgy, containing nothing to see of actual value, notwithstanding the fact it was made by cinema’s greatest master. It was a successful campaign of suppression, across the whole of the MSM. You will never find out the names of those who decreed that the machinery be set in motion to accomplish that task.

  11. Thanks, Patrick, yes, I know you’re right. We will never see the ones who are truly in charge.
    I’d never heard of Kubrick; I’ll have to look him up.
    I’d thought that Fox being owned by Murdoch, and Murdoch being perhaps the largest media holder, (publishers, tv, movie producer, news papers, Dow Jones, media in 6 continents) would be a good start, but then I think I do remember something about a Saudi being the largest outside shareholder. One, at least me, would think this strange bedfellows, but that’s the secret of the whole thing. It’s already one big worldwide family.
    One thing that woke me up was when Glen Beck, (basically Murdoch’s voice) kept talking about the Imam that was trying to build a temple down the street from the World trade center location. I started looking the guy up and found that the Democrats use this Imam as a sort of foreign diplomat. They use USA tax payers’ money to send him over to the middle east and be our voice. That struck me as strange, especially since Fox was making such a big drama out of him trying to build a temple right next to where “his relatives” destroyed part of our country. But I found it even stranger when I saw that the Republican party under Bush used the same Imam in the same way.
    So finding out who owns the media being used for the hoaxes would simply be another fact that opens up our eyes as to the size of the machinery.

  12. Beth, you’re right, that would be a huge, difficult task.

    And to add to my most recent post above about strange bedfellows, another thing I found yesterday, maybe off topic, but Murdoch OWNS Zondervan Publisher!!!

  13. OT, Beth, I remember you saying you have fibro and trouble sleeping at night, and I wanted to tell you about an herbal tincture that’s good for both pain and insomnia. It’s called Scudder’s Alterative, by Gaia Herbs, if you’re interested. My apologies to all for a personal message.

  14. Patrick has captured my thoughts exactly. I was reading a long piece last night that exactly bears on this. It was basically a long history of the involvement of various elite players, worldwide.

    They all have connections. We only see what is placed before us for our consumption. Just like the old saw that “the devil’s greatest trick is in convincing us that he doesn’t exist”, that is the way this operates.

    When you peek behind the curtain they scream “conspiracy theorist”. Those who believe their celebrity politicians and their fellow travelers are in charge are misinformed.

  15. Really hate replying to these long streams of conversation, sorry guys it is my IT programming that would prefer one stream, one conversation. As it is, on the subject of trolls, beware they are appearing to be acting more intelligent, they have long streams of misinformation, usually respewing old stories, sometimes new twists, a document number at the end is a red flag for me. Yes everything in the media is in question, especially when they are all repeating the same lines. Will dispute that Beck is with Fox News, they separated, at a time may have found him compelling, but now see him as a total farce! Don’t get caught up in the weeds they planted!

  16. Considering what Patrick and lophatt are saying, and I do accept it all, there really isn’t anything anyone can do. It may be the right thing to try to wake people up to what’s going on so that they don’t get caught up in the plays, but the power is just too strong to fight against.

    Patrick, there could be a whole blogsite for everything that could be talked about with respect to Kubrick, couldn’t there? Thanks for bringing that into the conversation.

    Lophatt, do you mind telling us what article you read last night?

    I keep seeing reference to the gingerbread house, but don’t get it. Is there a short explanation?

    Thanks, all.

  17. Kathy, I no longer watch Fox News. My husband has watched it on and off and I’ll catch a few words sometimes, but I didn’t even know Beck left.

    I did fall for it for awhile, though, pretty many years ago.

  18. Violeta,

    The Vigilant Citizen did a three part analysis of the movie last summer ( that was full of stuff I had previously been unaware of. He really has a sharp eye for illuminati symbolism.

    Google “Kubrick moon” and you will find tons of stuff. His relationship with NASA began with a special camera he used to film Barry Lyndon, which enabled the indoor scenes to be filmed without studio lighting. They commissioned him to film the Apollo moon walks (Dave McGowan has a lot to say about the secret movie studio at Lookout Mountain where it was done: “wagging the moondoggie”). The filming for NASA’s hoax coincided with the making of 2001: a Space Odyssey. It’s kind of like working for the mafia, though, and he understood the danger. He never flew again, knowing how easy it is to make planes go boom!. An American, he lived to England, where he then made his movies–and only would travel to America by sea. In fact, the opening scene of The Shining, the flyover of the vast, mountainous western US, was scripted by him–he was not in the plane.

    He truly knew the secret dark side, because he once worked for them. So when he exposed them, we should all pay attention to what he had to say.

  19. As we wait for my reply to you, Violeta, to come out of moderation (it’s been five and a half hours now, and counting), I’ll address a point I did not make in that comment. It has to do with hope to change things.

    1984 IS COMING. We cannot stop it. The Bible is true, and events will unfold as described therein. All we can do is prepare ourselves for what is to come. It’s like a hurricane. Force of will will not change it.

  20. Violeta, you asked what article I referenced. I’m attaching it here. It may be hard to make the connection (the subject is different), but it’s there.

    If you hang in there, read it all, and get to the end, it will provide some idea of how deep this rabbit hole goes. Remember, while we’re busy watching things like this, these mutts are doing things like described in the article. It is two different “realities”.

    These are the people Patrick is speaking of. These are the people I am thinking of when I make my comments. The ones we talk about are mere employees.

  21. Thanks for the link to the article, lophatt. I’m trying to get up to speed here, seems like everyone is few steps ahead of me.

  22. LoPhatt,

    Oh my goodness!!!!!! – I hope you know I wasn’t talking to you, right? I was replying to the troll whose name starts with “B”.

    Excellent points in your post.

  23. Hi Violeta, It sure would take one heck of a concerted effort and if that is the case, it is truly frightening.

  24. Also, Kubrick’s “A Clockwork Orange” and the use of the Ludovico Technique as well as Skinner’s behaviorist theories as key to an ideal society.

    Murdered children is an effective Ludovico technique wouldn’t you say?

  25. Violeta,
    Thank you so very kindly for reaching out to me with that information. I have written it down and will check this out. Thank you so very much!!
    Warmest regards, Beth

  26. Thanks Patrick – Kubrick was an immensely talented and fascinating fellow. I would be most interested to learn more about him when time permits. :) Thanks!

  27. Patrick, that’s a very thought provoking piece. Kubric was a master of symbolism and telling a story on multiple levels.

  28. Holy cow this is all so fascinating,yes its obvious that this event is a elaborate hoax,a staged event I believe to take our liberties(mainly our gun rights)and gut our constitution. I truly from my heart thank all you for trying to sort this out. I thought I had seen all that was available on this,but am so thankful to have found yall people and the “work”your doing is admirable. No really,its more ,it truly is heart warming to know that you people are on the job on this,america,the world should appreciate the fact finding mission to get to the “truth” of this. It makes me feel good to know that not everyone is an idiot and led by that by the msm. I would like to say this though,in reference to the idea of why people from newtown( the people from there not the transplants)haven’t tried to expose this for what it is. Cory ,who I believe is from their,makes an interesting point that the true natives of newtown kinda ignore all these newbies and probably just would rather they could go back to being that small town of yester year. It makes sense. Its not as though(and cory oddly states the 28000 residents being in on the sham?) all these people are complicit its just that they have lost there small town and see that perhaps its all changed ,much like the small town I grew up in,in that I’m just not that inclined to go rub shoulders with all the newbies who have changed “my”town. So I believe there are plenty of people in newtown that are quite aware of this hoax that has been pulled off on the world ,but feel as though newtown isn’t the newtown of old and so let’s see ewhat becomes of this. In todays world its not so hard to accept that a lot of people are in on it,not in my opinion. Especially with all this money and other forms of rewards for acting. The people of newtown ,the real ones are no different than you or me,but some of these newbies are indeed non-human. It still freaks me out that “people” would collude to do these things but that’s the way it is today,meaning that its easy to find such people as we as a people have certainly lost most of our morals and have become a very greedy animal or at least to busy with everyday grind and other things of importance. Its great to know yall are on the job though ,don’t sweat the people not speaking up though its no biggie ,it means nothing. By theway I would like to take this opportunity to ask those of you who aren’t aware of the chemtrail spaying that’s going on to look up and be aware ,spread the word if you could ,this must be stopped. Our government is out of control ,disgusting.

  29. Break it into paragraphs, buddy, or I’m not going to read it. The people around here are good writers. They want to be understood. That should be your guide. I have no idea what you wrote, and won’t read it unless you fix it. If you want us to pay attention to you, take my advice.

  30. Hi John Wayne – I like your “handle”. Thank you for your kind note. Welcome aboard.

    Your comment about the $ and such reminds me of this: I live in an area that has benefit GREATLY from BP settlement money…and there has been little to know damage here. It is an incredible scam. Certainly there were areas on the Gulf that were damaged and it sickens me to see such things happen. But, I’m strictly speaking of people (and towns) who jump on the bandwagon (or should I say “bankwagon”) and start filing made up claims for funds. You wouldn’t even believe the amount of money that has come to my area …for no reason. Just good “lawyering” and folks that no how to fill out a claim form.

  31. Honestly, we don’t know if that took place on the day of, or if that was recorded as part of a drill earlier in the fall. The weather was just above freezing as I recall someone found out, and the blonde guy who reports on the person in the black jacket and camo pants looks like he himself is dressed for much warmer weather. He might have been a generous drill participant with a more solid acting skill than the other clowns we have seen. We don’t know that anything of what we have seen videotaped and spread by MSM was actually taped on the day of.

  32. Theresa, that’s very true. There are segments that have Christmas lights on the eaves in one shot and none in another. The foliage is also different. I think they used footage from a number of drills and “green screened” the rest.

    In discussing (sometimes arguing) about this we shouldn’t forget that all we know is what we’ve been shown. It is almost impossible to form a conclusion. You can only make intelligent guesses based on what they’ve provided.

    Even things we think are absolute should be couched in terms of “based on what we’ve seen”. It is what we don’t see that is telling. This production could have been done a number of ways. If you study it you’ll see that there are massive holes in the sequence. Things are suddenly there with no frame of reference for how they got there.

    They do the same thing when they make a film. There are “reference shots”. They are used to establish location,etc., in the film. What all of this was is essentially a running narrative spoken over emotional scenes. The scenes are not “informational”.

  33. I am in solid agreement with your last comment lophatt.

    Based on what we have been allowed to see, I am betting large, that the redacted information will “not” support the official story at all, and will actually prove conspiracy (for any number of possible goals & reasons).

    As I understand the time line, the laws that have allowed the creation of the redacted files are very “new”. Our challenge now, should be to get well informed legal advice on how to publicly challenge these new laws through the court system and/or through political channels.

    I have been told, that the 16 person committee that is reviewing this event on “our” behalf, do not have access to the redacted information either. (This brand new censorship tool for the perpetrators is a far too convenient to be considered coincidental. I am betting that these new laws will ultimately be proven to be a key part of this conspiracy.)

    This means that the committee must make their recommendations for us, based solely on the same limited information that we ourselves have been allowed to see.


    There may well be members of this committee that will publically support
    our challenge for access access to the redacted files.

    What do you think?

  34. Worth a try Terry! If someone serves up the names and addresses I will send letters to each with that request….and share the replies on this blog. The inquiry and the nature of the reply is valuable in itself.

  35. Hi! No, I doubt it. The Sandy Hook Commission is going to be about as fruitful as the Benghazi hearings.

    Take a look at the member list:

    Too bad they couldn’t stock the list with everyday folks vs. people who are tied to state / federal monies, etc. Now, if they really wanted to reveal the truth…(which they don’t), they’d invite the MemoryBlog crew right here! I won’t wait by my email/phone, however….

  36. Well Terry, its worth a try. There have been some pretty odious judicial decisions lately. In this case smearing “national security” all over it is unlikely to get any traction.

    I completely agree that this “committee” is in the same boat we are. That provides the cover for their crimes and provides the appearance of thoroughness.

    The original motions to suppress the information made no logical sense. You can’t “threaten” a dead person, adult or minor. What “threats” could they be talking about. Threats are already illegal.

    Basically, they went to a friendly judge and said “we want to suppress public information so they don’t find out what we did”. Then they build a “report” that states right out of the chute that no useful information is contained within.

    So, public information doesn’t belong to the public and oversight is not permitted.

  37. Totally agree, Lophatt – and if it causes enough stink, we’ll appoint a committee or a reviewer to “review” the concerns raised…sort of like the IRS investigation. It makes my head ache.

  38. With regard to Kubrick (Eyes Wide Shut, his last movie), it makes you wonder if he pushed one too many buttons w/the last piece. He died suddenly. (Wonder if they looked for needle marks during autopsy…

    Wonder if the lady who released Obama’s long-form fake birth certificate –only person to pass on in the small plane crash had a needle mark. She was fine, calm, hanging on one sec, and just lets go and slips underwater. Sounds odd to me…

  39. Thanks Beth, Just reviewed your link to the Warren Commission, sorry….the 911 Commission….oops…I got it now…the Sandy Hook Commission….by wait….this reads to be some other commission!…how can the prisoners investigate themselves? perhaps it is the Connecticut Insiders for Further Fabrication or the SHook Commission to Reaffirm Edits Willingly… SCREW for shorthand.
    Why I thought that there might be the remotest possibility of transparency is my lunacy.

  40. Beth, both good questions. One thing I thought went unanalyzed in the Kubrick piece was the “Naval Officer”. Could that have been L. Ron Hubbard?

    That is also “odd” that she was the only fatality in the crash. The others thought she was OK. I still don’t think we’re looking at the “seed” of the Kenyan goat herder. More like the spawn of the communist, pedophile, honkey-chasing poet, Frank Marshall Davis.

    Makes the Kenyan look like a saint. We all know that anybody who crosses these mutts should stay out of small planes.

  41. FV – you are hysterical. Yes, indeed…the fox is always guarding the hen house when it’s a gubbermint “investigation” / “commission”. What a joke.

  42. True, Lophatt. Kubrick was terrified of flying reportedly…we know why. He thought for certain that at some point someone would get him.

  43. Hi Dino! We were talking about the woman who supplied Obama’s long-form birth certificate…allegedly a fraud. I’ll link that story:

    On Director Kubrick…that’s off on another topic. Sorry. He was infamous for taking little pokes at things in his movies. Too much to go into here but good late night Google searches if you’d like to poke around :)

  44. Kathy,

    I think your instincts may be right. Beck is being sued for defamation by the Saudi student who was arrested at the Boston Marathon.

    The details of Alharbi’s possible complicity have been scrutinized and determined to be very suspicious by a wide variety of sources. Why sue Beck? He is one of many.

    Perhaps this is an intimidation tactic to scare off researchers and investigators who have uncovered powerful evidence that the marathon bombing was staged.

Comments are closed.