On this edition we are joined by attorney Keith Labella, editor of gangstalkingismurder.wordpress.com. Mr. Labella has researched gangstalking (also known as “mobbing”) for over a decade after his own experience with the phenomenon while working for a Wall Street securities firm in the late 1990s.
A graduate of Baruch College and Fordham Law School, Labella was admitted to the New York Bar but has withdrawn from practice and is presently living in Southern California. He has used his legal training to successfully file numerous Freedom of Information Act requests with federal agencies, including the FBI, that confirm government knowledge and complicity in various gangstalking programs.
Submitted by Tony Mead
(Warning: Graphics contain strong language/profanity)
Since so many people are showing up on my Facebook page for the first time, not knowing the persecution that we’ve endured, I think it appropriate that I introduce you to the HONR Network.
The HONR Network was founded by Lenny Pozner to seek out, identify, stalk and harass anyone who investigates the suspicious and confusing facts surrounding the Sandy Hook incident. They are dedicated to investigating individuals’ backgrounds, places of employment, family and friends, and then attacking their targets by posting personal information, pictures and even contacting people’s employers with accusations of harassment.
Lenny Pozner and HONR Network elite members strategize
their next move: “Hope … we get his brother in laws
Over the past 3 years, I have been continually stalked and harassed by this relentless, calculating, heartless group who seem to work round the clock, dedicating their lives to “debunking” any inconsistencies that we find and defending the idea that the Sandy Hook Massacre was a genuine tragedy.
Kevin Scott King
One method I use to try and ascertain what the truth is from any narrative is what I call the Possible-Probable test. The first question I ask myself; “is what I just heard/read/seen possible?” And at this point my definition of possible is very very broad, in affect I’m willing to stretch to accept that something is possible. I’m trying to keep an open mind, I’m trying to be unbiased and neutral. With an emphasis on ‘trying’. Therefor I am reluctant to use the word impossible, until I am thoroughly convinced it is.
As an extreme example. If you randomly select one person from the world’s population could they run the 100m dash in under 10 seconds? It is possible, but improbable. In fact so improbable, so unlikely, that you could safely answer ‘No’. Now change it to 20 seconds. 30 seconds. The probability changes radically with each 10 second interval. Now let’s take two cases of alleged shooters from Sandy Hook and San Bernardino. Many have claimed that Adam Lanza and Tashfeen Malik were physically incapable (impossible) of carrying out their supposed feats of shooting. I beg to differ. Not impossible. Difficult, hard to move, slow… yes. Improbable? Yes. But realistically possible. If a young malnourished Somali boy can handle an AK-47, I’m confident these two could gear up and handle the weight for the short amount of time they were supposed to have been active. For the record I don’t think either did any shooting. I just disagree with the line of reasoning that it would have been impossible for them to do so. Hence I would not use it when trying to make my case for a false-flag.
Facebook has blocked the following post from being shared on its platform.
Mercenaries from the Craft International, a tactical training company for the US military, carried out last week’s false flag operation in San Bernardino, California, according to Steven D Kelley, a former NSA/CIA contractor.
On Wednesday, Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, and Tashfeen Malik, 29, stormed a holiday party in San Bernardino, California, killing at least 14 people and injuring 21 in the deadliest mass shooting in the US in three years. Hours later, the couple reportedly died in a fire exchange with police.
Updated 12/8/15 6:05PM
H/t Washington’s Blog
A witness described one of the Paris terrorist shooters as “white”.
Similarly, three witnesses interviewed by local news media, Juan Hernandez, Sally Abdelmageed, and an unidentified black man describe the California terrorist shooters as “white”.
Hernandez: “Where I was at right here we’d seen three white men in military fatigues, taking off.”
Reporter: “What were they driving?”
Hernandez: “They were driving a black Impala–or SUV.”
Reporter: “Do you think they might have been the shooters?”
Hernandez: “The way they were driving? Yeah.”
Reporter: “And how many shots did you hear?”
Hernandez: “A lot. It was a lot. Like I said, it sounded like a gun range. Just like shots going off like crazy. It was a lot–a lot of shots.”
Corporate media are covering President Barack Obama’s December 6, 2015 televised address as one where “the Commander in Chief has sought to reassure a nation on edge about terrorism,” as Time put it. The Wall Street Journal‘s front page story similarly emphasizes that Obama has “aimed to reassure a jittery nation … about the rising threat of domestic terrorism.”
What is clearly excluded from such interpretations and Obama’s speech overall is the fact that the United States, its intelligence agencies and international allies are the main sources of terrorism–including the Islamic State and Al Qaeda–while many of the terroristic mass shooting events over the past few years, including the 11/13 Paris “attacks” and last week’s San Bernardino event, are highly questionable.
Obama claims he wants to protect the country from terror and “fight ISIL.” Yet how should one regard a leader who consciously trains and arms thousands of marauding killers abroad to terrorize entire populations while spying on and disarming the citizenry at home? Who is the real terrorist?
Jeff Rense and Prof. Jim Fetzer discuss Amazon.com’s transnational ban of the new blockbuster volume, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook. The book is being downloaded worldwide by the thousands free of charge, yet the pdf has also been reportedly removed from the accounts of Amazon Kindle users.
They also discuss the recent San Bernardino mass shooting, and the Obama administration’s reckless leadership of the nation on this December 3, 2015 program.
Submitted by Kevin Scott King
Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11, London 7/7 bombings, Madrid train bombings, Osama bin Laden Capture/Death, 2011 Norway Attacks, Charlie Hebdo, Boston bombing, Sandy Hook, JFK, RFK, MLK, Pearl Harbor, Lusitania, USS Maine, Gulf of Tonkin, USS Liberty, Aurora CO shooting, Charleston church shooting, Tuscon (AZ) shooting, Port Arthur, AUS, all very real illusions.
The purpose of this article is to break down false flag events into their parts, deconstruct them. In so doing then create a template on how to study an event and determine if it is a false flag. Normally when one thinks or speaks of a false flag event they are referring to the Main Event. This presentation is about the entire operation or plan of which the Main Event is but one part.
Note: What follows is but a brief or summary of a much larger project. I am posting this to the community at large to inspire others to turn this into a full fledged project which could include a website, presentation(video), and book. Further details can be found at the end of this article.
This afternoon Rita Katz’s “SITE Intelligence Group,” the enduring conduit for Islamic State’s slickly produced videos of alleged Western journalist beheadings, are vigorously promoting a new ISIS video.
The report/video is titled, “Russian-Speaking IS Fighter Beheads Alleged Russian Spy in Video,” and observes that the IS hatchet man has “threatened Russia with attacks.”
CNN’s Wolf Blitzer is the first major cable news network to run with the report. Blitzed and Katz are both prominent Zionists. SITE has released no such “beheading videos” for several months after it was revealed that the material is probably inauthentic.
SITE Intelligence now warns non-subscribing visitors to its website from using any of its material without notification and attribution.
Apparently CNN is a SITE subscriber.
As of November 27, 2015 the BBC, one of the world’s most powerful mass media outlets, still has an incomplete sketch on the details of exactly who perished in the November 13 Paris terror attacks, which French authorities say resulted 130 deaths and over 350 injuries. With its abundant staff and resources, it is unusual that the news outlet with global reach would abandon such an important story. Yet it has–as have many of its competitors.
On its page, “Paris Attacks: Who Were the Victims?” the government-sponsored broadcasting giant lists hyperlinked photo descriptions of 42 victims, and verbal descriptions of an additional 83, for a grand total of 125. That means there are five fatalities Aunt Beebe–which played a central role in publicizing the attacks throughout the world–has failed to document.