On this week’s program Dr. Kevin Barrett returns to discuss his important new edited volume, Another French False Flag? Bloody Tracks From Paris to San Bernardino, which features essays from several notable authors, including Stephen Lendman, Gilad Atzmon, Anthony Hall, and Alain Soral. Tracy and Barrett discuss the emerging “false flag paradigm” vexing conventional scholars trapped in the academy. This was on display when Barrett was recently disinvited from an academic conference on Islamophobia in Paris last December–an experience that inspired an independent scholarly tele-summit and Another French False Flag?
James F. Tracy
This article was originally written in November 2015. Many have accused this author of teaching “conspiracy theories” to college students. Contrary to critics’ assertions, however, events such as the Sandy Hook School massacre or Boston Marathon bombing were never addressed in any courses taught at his former university. Only in the last college class he taught over a twenty year career in academe (13 of which were spent at Florida Atlantic University) did he have a chance to carefully examine and discuss September 11, 2001, or, more specifically, the US government’s official 9/11 conspiracy theory.-JFT
An enduring psychological effect of “the propaganda of the event” is a foremost element of all modern forms of war. Advances in hidden governance and concentrated media ownership have made the “war on terror” possible via increasingly fine-tuned trauma based mind control–in other words the enforcement of belief through overwhelming events subsequently placed in meaningful narrative context absent any contradictory information.
Such a phenomenon is readily apparent among the younger generations, particularly as they have come to rely on US government-sponsored conspiracy theories in order to make sense of momentous political events bearing upon their lives. Despite their irrational nature and profound shortcomings, such conspiracy theories are unquestioningly accepted as valid by an overwhelming majority of journalists and academics, who then repeat them as fact to their respective constituents.
La Conférence des Refusés!
Exposing the Friday the 13th Black Op in the City of Light. Usher in a New Siècle des Lumières by Illuminating the Lies and Crimes of the Friday the 13th ISIS Deception.
WARNING TO OUR FRENCH AUDIENCE: France has started blocking websites like they do in China so it may be difficult for you to watch our live stream unless you sign up for a VPN service. Click here for a link to several free and paid VPN services.
Are false flag attacks – attributed to Muslims, actually committed by the enemies of Muslims – a major factor behind the spread of Islamophobia?
Is “Islamic State” a real Muslim group – or a false-flag group created, armed and deployed AGAINST Muslims by the enemies of Islam?
Who was really behind the recent terror attacks in Paris? (Check the links at the bottom of this article for clues.)
These are among the questions to be considered at the False Flag Islamophobia Conference to be held in Paris, France, 6 to 10 pm Paris time on December 12th, 2015, the eve of the one-month anniversary of the Friday the 13th attacks.
Corporate media are covering President Barack Obama’s December 6, 2015 televised address as one where “the Commander in Chief has sought to reassure a nation on edge about terrorism,” as Time put it. The Wall Street Journal‘s front page story similarly emphasizes that Obama has “aimed to reassure a jittery nation … about the rising threat of domestic terrorism.”
What is clearly excluded from such interpretations and Obama’s speech overall is the fact that the United States, its intelligence agencies and international allies are the main sources of terrorism–including the Islamic State and Al Qaeda–while many of the terroristic mass shooting events over the past few years, including the 11/13 Paris “attacks” and last week’s San Bernardino event, are highly questionable.
Obama claims he wants to protect the country from terror and “fight ISIL.” Yet how should one regard a leader who consciously trains and arms thousands of marauding killers abroad to terrorize entire populations while spying on and disarming the citizenry at home? Who is the real terrorist?
This afternoon Rita Katz’s “SITE Intelligence Group,” the enduring conduit for Islamic State’s slickly produced videos of alleged Western journalist beheadings, are vigorously promoting a new ISIS video.
The report/video is titled, “Russian-Speaking IS Fighter Beheads Alleged Russian Spy in Video,” and observes that the IS hatchet man has “threatened Russia with attacks.”
CNN’s Wolf Blitzer is the first major cable news network to run with the report. Blitzed and Katz are both prominent Zionists. SITE has released no such “beheading videos” for several months after it was revealed that the material is probably inauthentic.
SITE Intelligence now warns non-subscribing visitors to its website from using any of its material without notification and attribution.
Apparently CNN is a SITE subscriber.
As of November 27, 2015 the BBC, one of the world’s most powerful mass media outlets, still has an incomplete sketch on the details of exactly who perished in the November 13 Paris terror attacks, which French authorities say resulted 130 deaths and over 350 injuries. With its abundant staff and resources, it is unusual that the news outlet with global reach would abandon such an important story. Yet it has–as have many of its competitors.
On its page, “Paris Attacks: Who Were the Victims?” the government-sponsored broadcasting giant lists hyperlinked photo descriptions of 42 victims, and verbal descriptions of an additional 83, for a grand total of 125. That means there are five fatalities Aunt Beebe–which played a central role in publicizing the attacks throughout the world–has failed to document.
Drs. Kevin Barrett and Jim Fetzer
No Lies Radio
Two top analysts of government intrigue and geopolitics provide observations and insights for plenty of lively discussion with friends and family alike around this year’s holiday dinner table.
Click here for a list of hyperlinked references to the stories covered in this week’s report.
One Russian plane may even indeed have slightly crossed the border while maneuvering. But the real reason why the U.S. military official and Turkey claim the above “violations” is because Turkey unilaterally “moved” the Turkish-Syrian border five miles south:
Putin Labels Action “Stab in the back”, US Backs Turkey, Special NATO Meeting Convened
Turkey, a member of the US-led NATO alliance, shot down a Russian jet today, claiming that it flew into Turkish airspace. Russia countered that the plane was clearly in Syrian airspace. Was the act a provocation on the behalf of the NATO alliance to begin a broader shooting war with nuclear-armed Russia?
According to one analyst (below) the pilots ejected after their plane was hit but were killed in mid-air. Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov cancelled his visit to Turkey following the incident.
NATO has reportedly called an emergency meeting after the plane was shot down.
On October 27, 2015, sixteen days before the November 13, 2015 Paris attacks, Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan, former UK MI6 Chief John Sawers, Director of the French Directorate for External Security Bernard Bajolet, and former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaacov Amidror met in Washington DC to discuss how to get rid of democratically-elected Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, particularly in light of recent Russian involvement in destroying “ISIS”–the US proxy army.