Sandy Hook Demolition Crew Sworn to Silence

Employees of a construction company contracted by Newtown to demolish Sandy Hook Elementary School must sign non-disclosure agreements before commencing work on the project, scheduled to begin October 21. The contracts reserve the right to pursue legal action against workers who publicly discuss what might be observed as the 57-year-old structure is leveled. Penalties also apply to employee attempts at removing any physical remains from the site.

Exhaustive in scope, the agreement requires workers to refrain from leaking information on virtually anything encountered on Sandy Hook grounds during or after their time of employment with Consigli Construction, the company subcontracted to carry out the demolition.

No unauthorized disclosure or removal of confidential information from the school, including any oral, written, graphic, software, technology, or virtually any items that belong to the school.

All measures [will] be taken to protect the secrecy and avoid disclosure of confidential information into the public domain; notification to the town of any disclosure of confidential information that may come to the company’s attention.

No publication or posting of any information related to the project, and no photographs, drawings or other images of the school; no removal of any items from the school from dirt and bricks to doorknobs and window glass; any town documents be returned to the town; these commitments survive beyond the conclusion of an individual’s employment.[1]

Newtown officials claim that such far-reaching precautions are necessary to preserve the privacy of victims’ families. “It’s a very sensitive topic,” Newtown Selectman Will Rodgers said. “We want it (the site) to be handled in a respectful way.”[2]

Newtown First Selectman E. Patricia Llodra similarly noted how the goal involves preventing exploitation of any building remnants. “We’re going to every possible length to eliminate any possibility that any artifacts from the building would be taken from the campus and … end up on eBay,” she told the Associated Press. [3]

Much of the building’s debris will be thoroughly crushed and hauled away to an unnamed location. Newtown also is requesting documentation that non-destructible metal and similar materials are taken off-site and destroyed.[4]

The Sandy Hook investigation has proceeded under a cloak of unusual secrecy, with very little substantive evidence or documentation disclosed that might reveal what exactly took place on December 14, 2012 and, moreover, Adam Lanza’s culpability. The corporate media have nevertheless proceeded to push a narrative with Lanza as the sole culprit.

Llorda and her Newtown cohorts swung into action three weeks ago on September 24 when Connecticut Governor Dannel P. Malloy offered the township $50 million to tear down Sandy Hook School and build a new facility.

The $50 million price tag is seven times the average cost of building an elementary school in the United States ($7,393,000), according to[5]

On October 5 Newtown leaders presented residents with a referendum to accept the $50 million that passed by a nine-to-one margin.

On October 7 contractors were on the Sandy Hook campus to begin drawing up plans for the project.

On October 11 the Newtown Bee reported that local authorities received a go-ahead from the State of Connecticut to contract with remediation vendor Bestech to oversee the entire venture.[6]

This means town officials will not have to go out and bid for a separate demolition contractor. Llodra notes how the use of a single entity will allow a two-to-three-week jump on work at the site, wholly ensuring that both the structure and post demolition debris will be removed by the first anniversary of the shooting.

Further, the use of Bestech will also minimize the number of workers on the site, allow for easier security credentialing, and thereby ensure controls preventing the unwanted acquisition of any debris or images generated during the demolition process.[7]


[1]  Nanci G. Hutson, “Non-Disclosure Required for Sandy Hook School Crew,”, October 14, 2013.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Dave Collins, “Newtown Conn. To Keep School Razing Under Wraps,” Associated Press / ABC News, October 15, 2013.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Shepard Ambellas, “Newtown School District Awarded $50 Million Payout to Rebuild Sandy Hook Elementary,”, October 6, 2013.

[6] John Voket, “State Action Gets Sandy Hook School Project Off to a Fast Start,” Newtown Bee, October 14, 2013.

[7] Ibid.

110 thoughts on “Sandy Hook Demolition Crew Sworn to Silence”

    1. The school was already planned to be torn down because of asbestos. There were no kids in that school that day. Where were they all? 600 kids and not one on camera? If you see photos of kids it is always the same photos of a bout a dozen kids running in a line as if in a drill.
      Adam Lanza? The neighbors didn’t know anything about him but the MSM kept using the name Ryan Lanza initially. Where is the mother buried? How about “Adam”? Numerous policing agencies could not get their stories straight about what kind of weapons were used. The coroner said everyone was shot by a rifle while the cops said only 9mm pistols were used. Now they say a .223 was used. I’ve never heard of all parents of every child having to ID their dead kid from a photo. I don’t believe any mother would give her kid up that easily.
      I don’t believe it happened, there is no written, photographic, electronic or physical evidence to support it. Hearsay and opinionated journalism is not evidence.

  1. Pretty efficient, but you’d think that they would be able to work in that the secrecy was necessary to protect the parents and the people of Newtown from Terrorism. It’s lack can only be considered an abysmal poverty of imagination.

    They managed, however, to put civil sanctions on secrecy of Private Enterprise to parallel the criminal sanctions on secrecy of government. That way the spy state can know everything about people, while the people know nothing about the gangster power system.

  2. If the shooting actually happened, surely the scene of the crime would have been cleaned up long ago; most likely prior to the moving trucks arriving and taking all of the the furniture to the new school. What would the contractors possibly see that would be so interesting that it would require them to sign a confidentially agreement barring them from ever speaking of what they saw while demolishing a public school building?

    The only plausible scenarios that I can think of for this level of secrecy would be:
    1) the school does not exist.
    2)It has been vacant and abandoned for a long time and the signs that it has been vacant and abandoned are too obvious to hide.
    3)There is a building there but it is not the building we have been shown and/or it may have been used for another purpose.

    It’s interesting how the people in this town and those directly involved in this incident like to use privacy as a shield when it suits them. They used it to keep the road to the school building blocked by guards. They used it to keep the report hidden. They used it to avoid releasing the 911 calls as well as Lanza’s school records. Yet they do not seem to care about privacy when they collect donations and parade themselves around the country promoting the gun control agenda. It’s telling of what really happened at Sandy Hook that day. Or rather, what did not happen.

    1. No, it appears the building was in use and for real. I spent several days reading back copies of The Newtown Bee up until 12/14. I’ve spoken with people from Newtown. SHES existed. The video cannot be trusted, because a drill occurred the previous year and it could be faked.

      It’s important to not be the equivalent of 9/11 “no-planers”. Don’t be a “no-schooler” — it becomes a distraction for the “anti-conspiracists.”

      1. Then what possible reason could there be for this level of secrecy, in your opinion? They are demolishing a building. Something they have done many times before. What could those contractors possibly see that would be so private that they would be asked to sign a confidentiality agreement that is binding for life?

        I support free speech and free thought so I will always go with what makes the most sense to me rather then pigeonhole myself into a certain line of thinking in order to please others so if just questioning if the school existed makes me a “no schooler”, so be it. By the way, I don’t exactly find the Newtown Bee to be an unbiased source free of corruption. Just saying.

        1. Yeah, exactly.
          If you are going to question the “official” story, then do that. Nothing in that story can really be beyond reproach. The town, the school, the local paper, the state/corporate media….none of it adds up and there has been no public disclosure of anything. Like 911, we know almost nothing.
          My question, is the american Media being “infiltrated” with literally “Fake and Manufactured” stories for political gain?

        1. Ha ha ha indeed. Not only is the 19-Arabs-who-couldn’t-fly story so dumb no one should hear it without laughing, it is physically impossible for jetliners to fly that fast so close to the ground–the air is too thick for the engines. Likewise, the holes in the buildings are the wrong size. Not to mention that the nose cone of a jetliner is not a battering ram, but is instead very fragile. The structure of the towers was that of a steel cage; yet the TV show we all watched has the buildings simply absorb the “planes,” as if the buildings were made of marshmallow.

          The public, obviously, and be made to believe anything, no matter how outlandish, if they “see” it on TV. And then those who point out that it was only a TV show, and full of impossibilities, are made out to be kooks. “It’s important to not be the equivalent of 9/11 “no-planers”? Quite the contrary. It’s important to stand up and point out that the emperor has no clothes.

      2. None of it adds up, from the town hall meetings discussing closing an elementary (in 2012 before the shooting), to the plans for demolition of the “school” and construction of a new one. It’s all a showcase for the panopticon style prison our children are supposed to attend. Once they build this school 60 minutes will spend 20 minutes promoting it for all schools.

    2. Another possibility is that the demo crew will see a lack of evidence that the event occurred. Like no bullet holes, anywhere. Or no broken glass. Or some other details contradicting the main narrative.

      1. Yes, that is possible as well. I doubt that many of the crew will even be allowed inside but I suppose whoever is in charge will want to cover all of their bases by enforcing the confidentiality agreement.

  3. Amazing that there is sooooooooo much concern for these people of Newtown. Yet, the state and Feds are hiding a LOT, bet on it. How about the crisis actors in Sandy Hook, lack of public disclosures?
    No, thanks. This is one hoax crammed filled with lies and corruption. If you want to believe this garbage, have at it.

  4. Wow. This is the same type of destruction of a crime scene / evidence as we saw on 9/11 when they destroyed all the evidence of a possible controlled demolition. They shipped all the steel offshore at below market prices to a Chinese company that melted it down. The truckers responsible for moving the debris to Fresh Kills were outfitted with GPS devices to make certain there was no glitch in the movement of evidence. Indeed, one of the truckers stopped for lunch and was promptly fired to set an example for the others. The only difference is that the WTC evidence was immediately destroyed . . . Sandy Hook took 10 months (though the site was sealed off). You can bet that there will be no need for the demolition crew to go inside the condemned school building . . . Just bring the wrecking ball.

    The is no evidence to support the official narrative. Destruction of the SHES in such a secretive, controlled manner only fuels those who suspect a controlled conspiracy to suspend Constitutional rights. Epic fail.

  5. Catch 22-

    1. They paid to clean up the biological waste already, therefore there is nothing to hide.
    2. They DID NOT clean up the biological waste. If this is the case, the resulting debris would be contaminated with Bio-waste and need to be specially disposed of???

    which is it?

    1. Pat,

      You are assuming that there was/is biological waste… and there is no evidence that has ever been produced/released to prove that there was.

  6. Peculiar choice of words for a legal document, “All measures [will] be taken to protect the secrecy…” Synonyms from the Webster dictionary include: silence, mystery, concealment, clandestineness, shrouded, cloaked. Surely, a lawyer would have chosen confidentiality or privacy or something less derogatory. All those who questioned how people could go along with this charade, imagine what you do not see in this contract, you will be paid the sum of $?, failure to comply with these secrets will result in death as clearly this will never be presented in a court of law, lest we will all be declared criminals!

  7. yes to Mark, Ted, Pat, and Kathy
    Racketeering Syndicates need a good Consigli Consigliere

    1. I noticed the name, too. Is this just another example of them mocking us, laughing in our faces? They can get away with anything.

  8. Zembanity1, they have to cover up the physical evidence that might subvert the media narrative. In the Bobbie Kennedy assassination, for example, they found too many bullets or bullet holes in the walls and ceiling, more than the 8 bullets in Sirhan Sirhan’s gun. If they found no bullets or bullet holes, or the wrong kind or wrong number at Sandy Hook, it would subvert the media story. Then they’d have to have their script writers think up something else, always a dangerous process in these power scenarios: thinking.

    1. I disagree. They could have a small crew of experts go into the school and ‘remove evidence’ to be collected at a lab. This crew would go in, remove blood stains, remove bullets from walls, (possibly create a little more damage, etc). All under the cloak of being a team of experts that removes evidence.

      If they had a contracted demo team, only a very small small group of people would need to enter the crime scene area. They could more easily say they need to section off the crime scene area and have a special team demo the area so the entire demo company doesn’t see the crime scene out of ‘respect for the victims’ families.’

      I agree with Zembanity1 that there is something else going on. It would be smarter for them to control the small crime scene area rather than to have entire companies only sign off a waiver, and risk having some dumb Joe stumble into the classrooms and see absolutely no signs of a crime scene. They wouldn’t allow it. How many people work for the demo company?

      1. That is what I’m thinking as well, Bill. The “shooting” only took place in a small area of the school. It would make sense to me that if this was a real shooting, the crime scene would have been examined and cleaned up months ago. This could have went as far as new windows, drywall, paint,etc. since they only confirmed very recently that the school would be demolished. If questioned why the school spent money on things like drywall, paint, windows, etc. just to tear it down, It would be easy for them to say that the renovations were done out of respect for the victims and due to the possibility that the school would be reopened. I think that the town having to possibly explain the money spent on renovating those classrooms vs.having an entire demo crew sign lifetime confidentiality agreements would draw less negative attention to an obvious bungled hoax. Security has been tight around the school ever since the “shooting”. It makes sense to me that they are hiding something more then just a fake crime scene. The level of secrecy goes above and beyond what would be necessary. The possibility that there is no school at the site is just one possibility.

      Sirhan Sirhan Sits Like Buddha
      in a 10′ cell
      an innocent man in a living hell
      RFK’s Palestinian Patsy
      RFK’s own Oswald

  9. Gosh, lemme think… The Murrow Building in Omaha leveled. The Branch Davidian compound burned to the ground with church members and children in it, and leveled by dozers almost immediately. Steel from the WTC with residue of what may have been thermite on it sold overseas to France and some melted down and turned into a battleship – all while the hole was still hot. Now Sandy Hook school leveled while the evidence is all being suppressed under cover of suspicious law. I think I’m seeing a pattern here.

    1. The Murrow Bldg is another of the great hoaxes that has never truly been explained. A truckload of fertilizer and diesel fuel has the ability to cause a more devastating initial blow to a building than a 757 did the the Pentagon. The pentagon crumbled on itself afterwards whereas the Murrow building was crippled as pylons were destroyed underground. How long before was that building razed?

  10. Please ignore the pun; but, this overreaching effort on the government’s part is over-kill! [I’m thinking of Edgar Allen Poe’s masterpiece, captioned: “The Black Cat.”]

    The more cover-up involved with the Sandy Hook “shooting” governement / media event; the more reason to be reasonably sickened by this whole contrived affair:

    Government Sandy Hook bribes: Taxpayer reward hush money for Newtown Connecticut

  11. Let’s see….Bribery, Coercion, Subterfuge…and Contractual Enslavement. Yep. It’s completely obvious there is nothing to see here.
    It’s like the authorities are running into walls, doorjambs, falling over desks and jumping out of windows so that none of them have to point their finger at the Ginormous Elephant in the room. I see one authority hiding under a lamp shade and another in a corner slowly clubbing himself into unconsciousness and a few others running down the fire escape laden with bags of cash.
    I might as well be watching old reruns of Monty Python.

    1. “tammyc:”

      Your lib type ridicule gets old. Go back to your political playbook and begin to mirror something more innovative.

      For those who may have read “tammyc’s” comment:

      This is the old standard for those defending corruption. Offer nothing. Discuss nothing. Debate nothing. Only heap scorn and ridicule. That’s the practice of those with small minds, who wish to defend the unseemly and aberrant……..

      1. I read tammyc’s comment differently. It sounds to me like she is laughing at the ridiculousness of the half-baked scheme.

        It IS like a Monty Python skit. The trouble is, those of us who are awake, and swim comfortably at the memoryholeblog, are the only ones who can see it for what it is. Everyone else seemingly is mesmerized, wholly incapable of noticing the story looks like swiss cheese.

        1. Patrick –

          Yes. That, very well could be, what you say. Perhaps though, the author of that comment will elaborate more in a further comment.

          Your description of those who are apparently “mesmerized,” is spot on! People just don’t care to accept the Biblical principle of “the depravity of man” [human nature]. Or, they are so ignorant, that they accept most everything that is of a “‘news’ report.”

      2. Sorry my comment got you all wound up Nathan, that certainly wasn’t my intention. Patrick below got it right. Sometimes my sarcastic nature gets the better of me.
        I was trying to point out in my own silly way that the entire sandy hoax story is getting silly. The more they try to cover up the fact that nothing happened in that school, the more the fictional story falls apart.
        Everyone is making money from this. The “victims” families have been paid off, the police have been paid off, now the town gets paid off. It doesn’t cost 50 million dollars to build an elementary school.
        The only thing I regret about my previous post was that I left out the word FRAUD.

        1. tammyc –

          I’m the one who should be apologetic. Please excuse me for reading into your words. I should have asked for clarification.

          Good point you make! Yes. It doesn’t take 50 million to build an elementary school!

      3. I’m a lib, buddy, in your book (probably) because I look at it this way – they are clowns, and tammy just said so, and you took off after her like a shark. Keep it up and I’ll figure you work in Arizona in some quonset hut doing drone warfare.

  12. If I may change the topic for a moment, Pierre Omidyar, the founder of eBay and a multibillionaire, wants to start a newspaper. There are two factors that may be of interest here:

    1. He has hired Glenn Greenwald away from the Guardian to help him organize it. Greenwald is an honest journalist, a liberal, but not averse to allying with Snowden and Assange against the American power system. So it might be an honest paper.

    2. Omidyar was born of Iranian parents in Paris and moved to the US as a boy. So he may have a more cosmopolitan view of reality than the usual American billionaire. He has more money than he knows what to do with, and he appears to want to do something useful with the last half of his life. If it’s an honest paper, he’ll lose a lot of money, but he may be willing to do it. He is apparently based on the West Coast where I am.

    The point is that as Orwell said, telling the truth in a time of universal falsehood is a revolutionary act. It’s conceivable that he could finance the truth about the power conspiracies that James and the commenters have been uncovering. A long shot, sure, but his making billions of dollars from a sideline spinoff was also mostly an accident. You never know what the future is going to throw your way.

    1. Mark, I mentioned this in the other thread where you mentioned The Guardian.

      It’s really shocked me to be sure. You sound hopeful, but I’m very concerned that the NSA story will gradually be dropped.

      It may sound like the chance of a lifetime, but — I don’t know, tome it seems as though the job is not done – and is Greenwald abandoning it?

      It’s just given me an uneasy feeling.

      1. I feel the same way Mollie. It would be wonderful if Marks hopeful speculation were to end up true, but I am not an optimist. They only lat you be a billionaire if you play by their rules. Chavez of Venezuela didn’t play by the rules, and he suddenly came down with a cancer that killed him in months. He’s not the only one to find out what happens to people who think they can defy the core principles of the New World Order under construction. Gaddafi was another one who thought he could remain outside the system, and demonstrate it for all the world to see. And look what happened to him.

      2. The problem being that Glenn Greenwald does counter intelligence for a living. How do you trust a guy that doesn’t know what a controlled demolition looks like? How do you trust an Assange or a Snowjob? Have you really looked into these people? Have you ever met an Iranian ex-pat? Ever asked him how he feels about destroying Iran “to set it free”? You can’t be this naive.

        Being a liberal, or a this-or-that, doesn’t make you trustworthy. On the contrary, having a label of the kind makes one untrustworthy. It’s a gimmick.

    1. Thank you for keeping Sandy Hook alive…All I can say is ” what a mess” this story only deepens – so much secrecy and they get away with it.!.It only confirms what I thought.. No blood, and not a hundred round of bullets- No evidence of a lone gunman, can they not see that people know something is not right, this is not the way democracy runs so why is USA called a Democracy? I am just speechless.. workmen having to sign a non discloser agreement… shouts they are hiding something.

  13. Watch the December 10 2012 finance board meeting on Newtown website they are discussing which school to shut down because of low enrolment. Do we really think the enrollment will increase. Plus the school will not be done in time for any of the kids who were there that day to go there. As far as evidence being seen by workers you should watch this video I made Everything was already pulled out and walls were built within the corridor.

  14. Glenn Greenwald is touted as a journalist of integrity (I must admit he appealed to me before I started to research). Let us explore his association with Julian Assange. Assange is connected to the cultish compound where “The Family” experimented on children in isolation and with apparent secrecy under protection of some very respectable Austrailian luminaries. This is important as analogy; how easy it is to cover tracks when upper-eschelon figures are drawn into the conspiracy. (As we witness in SH, 9/11, et al.)

    Scroll down in comment section to see picture of Assange when he was
    in captivity. No doubt about it.

    1. My point is: is Greenwald a conscientious journalist or a clever opportunist looking for headlines? As to Assange’s motives, considering his ties to clandestine agencies (both Australian and US and what other globalist entities we can only guess), how can we accept him on face value? He is quite open while outing Western crimes and failings but less critical of his own peculiar method of operations, to which many of his colleagues will testify. What is his real agenda?

      Inquiring minds want to know. In the ‘spook’ world, nothing is transparent. And everyone is spying on everyone else.

  15. I went to the school this past April with a friend. So I can attest to the school physically being there. We parked at a community park right behind the school (police tape was up at the school driveway). We actually found hiking trails and followed them up to the back of Sandy Hook school. On the way we found a strange sight…a wooden pulpit and broken wooden benches setup like a church but in the woods and about an 8th of a mile from the school. There were balls and toys strewn through the woods, but looked like they were planted because they weren’t growing into the environment at all. We get up the trail and see the barbed wire fence with video cameras all over the top of the school and signs that read no trespassing beyond this point on the fences. We werent climbing barbed wire fences or anything but a man down the hill (he could see us through the clearing) started screaming at us to “get out”, and kept yelling “where did you park”…”you aren’t allowed to be here”. We yelled back that we were hiking on a hiking trail…he continued yelling as we began to walk back through the trail. Before we could get far an old ass 1990’s busted up Geo comes screamin up the driveway toward the playground area where we were trying to leave. An African man in a very generic security suit with no name on it(company or nametag) jumps out scream “why are you here”. We tell him we were on the hiking trail and it led up to the back of the school. He said there are no trails here. We offered to show him the CLEARLY marked hiking trail colors on the trees but he just kept saying there is no hiking trail here and you must leave ASAP or get arrested. Get Arrested?? For hiking and “accidentally” (we really were there to check the area out) stumbling upon a school? The playscape there was so old and worn looking…it didnt seem to us a school in a rich town would have such a ratty looking play area. The doors and windows were boarded up…barb wire…cameras…and then threatened to be arrested by the strangest rent a cop we had ever seen. Nothing made sense..and wtf was that pulpit and benches doing there? Also it seemed like the man yelling through the clearing was literally there just “watching” this school that no one could get into anyway. WTF???

    1. Thanks for your courage in checking this place out. I think the rattiness of the playground is a give-away. I live in an affluent community in New England, where there are people at least as well off as in Newtown. One thing about the elementary schools is that they change the play equipment every few years. There’s always some safety issue, plus weathering in this climate. Believe me, rattiness is not acceptable. I wonder if you took any pictures of the area?

  16. I confess that the concerns about Greenwald astonish me. British papers are subject to more legal restrictions on security matters than American papers. Greenwald has previous complained about them. He has publically stated that he is going to work on a paper with fewer restrictions.

    Greewald was a civil rights lawyer. He is a civil rights journalist. Both Assange and Snowden trust him. He now has the opportunity to tell the American people what he has told the British people. The NSA story is a civil rights matter. The British prime minister Cameron is now attacking the Guardian over it. A reason for Greenwald to change media horses.

    It’s obvious that I don’t have a clue as to what American’s are afraid of.

  17. Per Mark: “Greenwald was a civil rights lawyer. He is a civil rights journalist. Both Assange and Snowden trust him.”

    Therein lies the problem I have with GG. His civil rights lawyering included defending an extremist right-wing organization, more-rabid than the KKK, if you look at them objectively. He did so pro bono. One of the cabal’s members murdered a sitting judge’s husband and mother in retaliation for her decisions. See Matthew Hale, founder of that sect based on white supremacy. He is still in prison for soliciting an undercover FBI agent to kill a judge. Greenwald’s ‘freedom of speech’
    defense of hate speech diminishes the First Amendment, IMO.

    As both Assange and Snowden have odd, murky backgrounds, it is not surprising that GG gravitates to them like blood relatives. Birds of a feather, as the saying goes. Many leftist and right-wingers seem determined to bring America to heel for their own warped purpose.

  18. No, Patrick, the American people are suspicious about the wrong things and gullible about wrong things. The common complaint is that the American people been de-politicized, but the problem is much worst than that. We have been DE-HISTORALIZED. We have been Educated, Informed, and Entertained to identify with a perverted Disneyland version of historical American power, and we are prevented from putting present reality in historical perspective.

    The American world-view has been constricted by space-time constraints, leading us to forget the past and ignore the future. The American homeland is conceived as a sub-world all its own, separated as Exceptional from the rest of the world. Americans are Educated by the schools to be historically illiterate, so we cannot conceive historical reality from a people’s perspective, and therefore cannot develop reasonable expectations about the future.

    The American ideological world-view of Freedom&Democracy is dysfunctional, so the simple reasonable truth, told by Greenwald, Tracy, and Assange, is outside the conventional American truth consensus. The simple reality-based truth is an Un-American truth, so Americans can’t distinguish it from the kind of delusive untruths that you tell. This does not bode well for the future, since the American people don’t know what to believe. They will therefore follow their feelings, and those feelings have been perverted by American power.

    1. I agree with every word here, Mark, I think, but I’m confused by these 13: “Americans can’t distinguish it from the kind of delusive untruths that you tell.” Is “you” me?

    2. Mark, I am concerned you put Dr. Tracy, Greenwald and Assange on the same level of pertinent disclosure. They are not. Greenwald is suspect for being in the right place at the right time–always–for maximum press exposure. I wondered, for example why his Brazilian lover happened to be in the spotlight and apprehended by British officials. Seems too perfectly staged to be coincidental; the follow-up story made global headlines. Right up Greenwald’s alley. His M.O.

      Assange, as posted above, is a loose canon by any standard.
      I wouldn’t trust a man with his questionable resume. On the other hand, Dr. Tracy has credentials, with no perceivable (that I can discern) hidden agenda. I can’t make that statement re GG and Julian Assange.
      Only time will tell as the narrative plays out. I am watching and waiting.

      Important issues are being projected onto a very large international screen.

  19. You know the site where the Boston bombings happened? I was there a few months ago and I was amazed that they didn’t repave the area. All they did was clean up the blood. People are still walking on the same sidewalk everyday where people were killed and injured.

    1. That’s because no one actually died there or was really insured other than the poor boys they framed!

    2. The more I learn about Chris Manfredonia the more convinced I am that he was involved. Some astute individual stated that they saw a plate with the names of Roig’s students including (apparently) Manfredonia’s daughter’s named (Alexa) on Roig’s Facebook page. That picture was subsequently removed.

      If this can be verified it is very significant in undermining Manfredonia’s story and points to him as a potential participant.

      This is what we have:

      1. He was confronted by police on the outside of the school heading toward Crestwood.

      2. He lived right behind Lanza’s house.

      3. He apparently the only parent there that morning to make gingerbread houses. Wouldn’t there have been a number of other parents there as well ?

      4. Roig’s class was the first in the hall and unlocked so if he was looking for his daughter why did he not go to her classroom instead of running away from the school to look for her on Crestwood ?

      5. His story is very lacking in details. We don’t know if he saw the shattered window or not, he heard pop pop pop and smelled sulfur so instead of taking 4 steps into his daughters classroom or looking in the window he ran away?

      6. Scott Vollmer works for Compass Group and has a friend named Daisha Manfredonia also employed by Compass Group. What is her relationship to Chris Manfredonia.

      7. Manfredonia apparently has a wife named Georgeann who was at the school the day before wrapping gifts with the Principal?

      1. The key point is why was Roig’s class spared despite being the very first classroom in the hallway by the entrance and that the door was unlocked? Is it because Chris Manfredonia was one of the shooters and that his daughter was in Roig’s class?

        1. I think that Chris Manfredonia is involved in the hoax mainly because he is going along with the story that he was the man in the woods. The other connections between him and this hoax just add credibility to him being involved. If you remember, we were also told that the man in the woods was an off duty swat member, from a nearby town, who happened to be hunting in the woods behind the school. I don’t think there was a shooting that day so I don’t think that Manfredonia was a shooter, nor do I think he was at the scene at the time of the “shooting” but I do think he knows what happened and is involved in helping pull this whole thing off.

    3. You’d be even more surprised to discover that benches intact after the “bombing” as seen in pictures, were smashed to pieces the next day when other pictures were taken. I cannot tell you have nauseating this event is for me. It has destroyed all of the city in my eyes, and shown it for a pretentious environment where people dare not find out things for themselves. One interesting thing: the Koch brothers are all over the place lately, sticking their money and influence in everywhere. Wonder what they are planning? Interestingly, Sean Collier was (allegedly) killed next to a building endowed by David S. Koch. Perhaps he is about reworking the Constitution so the peasants cannot have weapons. Who knows how they justify their projects.

      1. Sorry, that’s David H. Koch apparently a great benefactor and a seriously strange human being with unknown agendas.

  20. Looking at this situation from a citizen’s perspective, one could completely understand the need to demolish the school. I cannot see any reason whatsoever to rebuild the school for one reason; the students were conveniently moved to the “empty” Chalk Hill School over the Christmas Holiday, which was renamed “Sandy Hook” in January, 2013. Unless 500 new families moved into the area after the event, there simply is no need for two schools. Are they going to move the students from the refurbished Chalk Hill School back to the Sandy Hook School after it is rebuilt, and then demolish the 2nd school which is Chalk Hill?

    1. I’d put my money on the school never being built … Remember the $50 million is no strings attached. It will go straight into general coffers and Newtown will go on a ‘bonus’ spending spree to pay off all involved. But you probably wont read that in any political minutes.

    2. No one wants to make a collectors’ item of anything from the school – it’s ridiculous that the conversation has been framed thus.

      We must emphasize this in our quest for the truth of what truly occurred at Sandy Hook.

      1. The truth is that it was nothing more than a planned DHS drill at an abandoned school, coordinated at the Federal, State, and Local level. That is the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, I swear to God.

  21. I believe it is very possible the school is being pulverized, and all meltable materials melted down (not kidding), in order to assure no DNA evidence remains. It is not unheard of for 30-year-old cold cases to be solved with DNA evidence. Other than the inherent destruction of any ballistics evidence, I can think of no other genuine reason for melting down steel beams.

    1. Unless, of course, no DNA evidence was there to begin with. The american public hasn’t been presented anything but unsubstantiated repetition of often contradictory “official” opinion.

  22. Not convinced there was a massacre…but certainly I’m not surprised that they’re just “covering their tracks.”

  23. I feel sorry for anyone who still thinks the Sandy Hook “massacre” actually happened. This applies to people who believe in the Aurora hoax, Navy Yard “shooting,” Santa Monica “shooting,” Capitol “shooting,” Kenya mall “shooting,” 9/11 official story, etc. Indeed, I feel sorry for anyone who believes anything the regime and its media utter. But the greatest tragedy is that all of us, regardless of whether we fall for the regime’s lies or not, are victims of domestic terrorism perpetrated by the regime and its gestapo. Because the drills and hoaxes are directed against us. The regime wants us dumb, scared, and obedient, and unfortunately they have been quite successful.

    1. You can add the Gaby Giffords Hoax, the three women held in the “house of horrors” in Cleveland, and the wonderful Obamacare website to the list. They are all govt productions, and some are done better than others.

      1. And let’s not forget about the Boston marathon “bombing” and the heroic “capture and killing” of the long-deceased Osama bin Laden followed by the unfortunate helicopter “accident” which resulted in the death of all witnesses. The repertoire of the regime’s PR productions seems endless. What’s next?

        1. I believe that something far more sinister and far reaching than 9-11 is coming down the pike, probably long before the next shutdown in January. Perhaps something of a chemical, biological or nuclear disaster. The East Coast has been hit already with Sandy Hoax, 9-11, The Fake Boston Bombing….so perhaps something in the heartland, i.e. the Midwest?

  24. Let’s hope the demolition crew find the missing video surveillance tapes showing the phantom Lanza entering the school and shooting the perfectly resurrected principal. Incidentally, where are the surveillance tapes showing the “Muslim terrorists” who, according to the regime media, for three months rented a “secret room” in the Kenyan mall to plan that horrific massacre? The human race has degenerated so much that self-annihilation, the way we seem to be heading, may be the only viable solution.

    1. This is all straight out of Orwell’s novel. The “war on terror” is really a war on Americans carried out by the Big Brother regime. The ignorant masses are lied to and manipulated to believe a “war on terror” is actually taking place and that Big Brother will protect them. The only price the ignorant masses have to pay is the relinquishment of all their constitutional rights. Win Win situation.

      1. You said it perfectly. It is a war of dispossession through the mastery of illusion(delusion)… at least that’s what they think. My mind drifts to an image of Donald Rumsfeld with that smug, prick-ish smirk during 9/11; or in the documentary “The Dark Side of the Moon”. Oh yes, thinks the old geezer, ‘ well, aren’t I such a clever little fellow..’…

      1. It never ceases to amaze me how successful the demonization of Fox News always is. As if it is this colossus, this staunch opponent of the establishment, a true alternative voice. Moore can just talk like that and it’s accepted as obviously true. What a joke.

        It’s like all the times Bill O’Reilly is portrayed as a fire breathing radical conservative. Any conservative who breathes only altoids laughs at that. The idea that Fox in any way represents an alternative view of he political landscape is a joke. That the idea gains any traction at all is a painful indication of how bad the situation is in the media today.

        1. CNN news : Ban guns and civil liberties.
          Fox news: “The Shooter”, Adam Lanza was on psychotropic drugs and armed security guards should be posted at all schools.
          Real Alternative news: Sandy Hoax Elementary School.

  25. It’s time for action. What would happen if there was a wall of people around the school to prevent it’s demolition until an independent third party can view the “evidence”. Anybody remember the 60’s? Only the “TRUTH” can set the people of Newtown free.

    1. Newtown PD really should get an injunction halting demolition. The official story has trifurcated–Lt. J. Paul Vance vs. Newtown PD vs. individual state troopers/detectives. Newtown PD, for one, will need that building intact as evidence in their own defense.

    1. This report is total hogwash! They report 5 fewer students in all the globby gook. When you look at the hard numbers provided there are 255 less students than last year or 5%. Had to check out our other reliable source of information, Wiki reveals 537 less students than 2012 and that would be 10%. Really hate it when they use round numbers! Have an excel spreadsheet if anyone cares to review.

      1. Oddly, the Newtown Public School district enrollment report Nov 2012 said there were 458 kids enrolled in SHS; Dawn Hochsprung’s alleged letter to parents (which I now suspect as being fabricated after the fact) stated there were 700 students in SHS.

Comments are closed.