Brendan Hunt Returns to Sandy Hook

From Brendan Hunt

On Sunday, October 20 New York-based videographer and independent researcher Brendan Hunt visited Newtown to further document the Sandy Hook Elementary School and its surroundings. The School is scheduled for demolition this week.

Hunt briefly interacts with Sandy Hook witness Roy Low, who was interviewed by CBS News the morning of December 14, 2012. In that interview Low describes the mysterious man apprehended by police in the woods behind the school.

Yet here Low declines comment, explaining how “that other guy got the FBI at his house. I don’t want any of that here.” Is Low referring to Ibragim Todashev, the acquaintance of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects who was killed while in FBI custody last May? (Note: Hunt has since pointed out that Low was gesturing as he spoke to suggest possible reference to a neighbor.-JT)

X-Ray Ultra TV

Hunt then visits the now-vacated residence of Marilyn Gudsnuk. Gudsnuk’s daughter Jessica explained to Hunt earlier this year how her mother observed Gene Rosen at the Sandy Hook Fire House on the morning of December 14 “looking for his kids,” just as screaming children were allegedly running from the school.

In the video Hunt also visits the remarkably dilapidated Sandy Hook School grounds to find new “Danger: Asbestos” signs posted on a rear door of the school. One must ask, if the structure contains asbestos, exactly how fit of an environment was it for children?

Images are also captured of the school’s abandoned and run-down interior through unshuttered windows.


159 thoughts on “Brendan Hunt Returns to Sandy Hook”

  1. the pile of evidence against them is stacked to the ceiling.. this coverup goes to the top.. whether obama is the “top” or not is up for debate, it could have come from higher elites.. but surely obama knows and many on the downline know.. i’m sure tons of blackmail and threats (and even murder) were used along the way, it’s no small operation. but it is very sad to know that many families like the low family are being threatened by the feds.. i don’t know what recourse we have other than to keep waking people up.. great work

  2. Right away the Sandy Hook incident seemed unbelievable as described by the mainstream media. Too many inconsistencies that were impossible to ignore led me to look further to alternative media for information. Brendan Hunt’s documentary was one of the best and I highly recommend it to anyone who’s interested in the early days of the investigation. I’m happy to see a young person who is willing to look deeper, but I also fear for the possible consequences for him. Thank you Dr. Tracy for posting this on your site and for keeping the story “alive”.

  3. Brendon Hunt, as it looks to me, has done more research and critical thinking, and real journalism than ALL the mainstream presstitutes COMBINED. I continue to see the battery of slanderous comments trying to demean anyone who questions the Sandy Hook Movie. This IS what we have come to. Lies ARE the truth, Ignorance is Strength, so says Main Stream – bought and paid for propaganda. HAts off to Brendon. Be Careful.

  4. Boston is about to host the World Series first game at Fenway Park. Now all the references are to “Boston Strong” and the idea that if you get drunk, you are insulting and dishonoring this epithet, perhaps even spitting on the graves of the victims. It’s all so religious, and lacking in a basis in reality. Boston is now Lourdes.

  5. Where are the BILLS connected to this ‘school’ that was supposedly in operation & had hundreds of children attending it ? (electric bills,water bills, trash bills,food delivery people & bills,heating bills,cooling bills,school supply bills etc…etc..etc… ). This would be the sure fire way to legitimise that this was NOT even a functioning school at the time, as the evidence is mounting that this is of course is the case here.
    Who would be able to investigate this ? there must be someone who could get this type of information. As those of us that are non believers in the ‘story’ of sandy hook, THIS seems like the best and easiest way to determine what didnt go on there . Where are all the other people like Brendan who are interested in finding the truth ? there have to be others who have the funds that could hire the proper people to delve into this kind of information ? where are they ? or like everything else concerning this sandy hook ‘TV SHOW’ could all of those be faked too ? well that is a dumb question, of course they could be. but its worth a shot for someone to try to find these bills. Just an idea .
    But of course according to myself & so many others who understand what is going on around here, sandy hook was nothing but a ‘TV show’ put on the boob tube for the American people, the majority of them are so incredibly gullible that they actually think this ‘tragedy’ happened when it was nothing more then another TV show just like every other Tv show on the CFR/NWO owned media networks, All it takes is a script, actors ,directors,camera men and people willing to trade their souls for the almighty dollar and WHAM you have another TV show put on the great propoganda box.

    1. I watched most of the recording by Brendan. But not all. So please enlighten me – why would anyone be fixated on a “second shooter” if no one was shot there?

      To me it’s like calling Boston a “false flag” and concentrating on other suspects (like the Men in Black). It’s a fake from start to finish. That includes the subsequent MIT stuff (totally nuts for a cop to be in car where Sean allegedly was, and then to be shot), and the whole Watertown thing with all the bullet holes in houses where the only cop injured was self-injured or friendly fired upon (even that is dubious). Then the injured – taken to a brand new rehab facility which had apparently not yet opened to the public.

      So it seems the important thing to bear in mind is that this is fiction and that no one got killed. You do not do that in the making of movies for propaganda purposes. You’d make enemies. You’d have squealers. No, this is a gravy train for those on it. It’s propaganda, paid for out of black budgets.

      1. Oh, and one more thing. The Boston One Fund – all that generosity – where does that slush fund wind up?

  6. Brendan is the real deal. Roy Moore is the key to that visit in my opinion. Even on the day of the ‘incident’ his wheels were turning talking to that reporter, I could tell that he could tell that that he was seeing oddities before his very eyes. And man, we all know the official story is wrong, but to truly know what happened, I’m not sure we’re any closer at knowing. I wish we could at least confirm there were some real deaths. Can we?

  7. Can anyone legally ‘incinerate’ asbestos on the site? Or is the so called asbestos just a cover to keep people away?

    1. Good question Pat , actually the state of Conn. has very specific requirements for disposal of asbestos ( but of course we know even if there was asbestos in this building , no ‘requirements’ will be followed) ,BUT if there was asbestos in this building , what were school children doing in the building just a few months ago ? ITS ALL meant to confuse & disorient the sheeple . here are the VERY specific requirements for this question ::

  8. Sandy Hook shooting was alleged to have taken place Dec. 14, 2012. That is about ten months ago. The condition of the play equipment is so faded and obsolete that I find it indicative of an abandoned building, something that has been closed for awhile. Why put up a notice about asbestos unless you had an inspection for it. What would trigger such an inspection – yes, concern for the demolition people. But how old are those signs, really? Is there a shot of such a sign pre-dating Dec 14, 2012? The slight view of the internal building shows derelict kinds of things – the peeling paint you’d see in a place that had been abandoned for quite awhile.

    Always, the question is how they pulled this off.

    One possibility is districting, so that it was arranged for only fake people to attend the place, while everyone else was sent somewhere else.

    How do people stay quiet? I realize I probably don’t know how my own society actually works. I was startled by 9/11, but what makes me think it was the first time this stuff was pulled.

    The important thing to realize is that our society is full of false information about who we are. One need only realize that NSA records everything we write and say. That alone should be cue that our description of ourself as rational citizens whose Constitution guarantees our natural rights is a lie. The lie itself needs to be seen for what it is, without even needing to detail how it was done. And then to seen responsible people who scruple over every receipt in the grocery story to keep from being cheated – just overlooking things like the impossible numbers of the dead and injured from a fireworks powered pressure cooker bomb that didn’t dent a mailbox or take a single branch off a tree or break the globe of a street light. Sorry, our elites are paddling along like swans in a sewer.

    1. The film was extremely descriptive to the condition of SHES. Derelict is too kind of an adjective to the condition of the school. It looks like it has been vacant for at least 20 years; the parking lot is a shambles, the bricks and mortar are collapsing, cracked windows from birds flying into them, and handicapped parking spaces that are obsolete. The American’s with Disabilities Act (1994) mandated that all handicapped parking spaces be painted blue and white. I personally haven’t seen a yellow handicapped sign as seen at Sandy Hook since pre 1990.

      1. Wow. Good find about the handicapped spaces. And the schools are the first to come up to code on them! You could probably notice violations of access too in the way the doors configure….. thanks!

      2. After looking through the homes for sale in Newtown, CT via – it is interesting to note that this school was serving what appears to be a fairly affluent population (in most areas). I’m assuming of course that property taxes helped to fund the school. This school, the parking lots, etc. seem to be pretty sub-standard when compared to the properties in the area but just an observation.

  9. Great work, Brendan, and it looked scary to do. If there really is asbestos, the demolition has to be done with covers and done carefully, so we’ll see if it’s true.

  10. Funny, the world trade center buildings were loaded with asbestos also. I guess that’s how they pick them.

  11. Hi Prof, its me Brendan. Thought I’d just add: it was my impression that Mr. Low was referring to a neighbor of his when he said the FBI had been there, because Low pointed to the West/Northwest when he said that, like one his buddies was living over that way…

  12. Was Sandy Hook Elementary targeted for this staged event due to the fact it was loaded with asbestos and they would be facing potential hefty lawsuits by families with all the kids being exposed there?

    Perfect solution was to hold the event there.

    Now they get to “demolish and pulverize” the building this week, (and all the workers have to sign confidentiality agreements to not talk about what they see) Get to build a brand new Elementary school worth $50M (twice the value of an average up-scale school), face ZERO lawsuits and face ZERO public criticism.

    It’s the perfect smoke-screen because the public was too busy watching what the one hand was doing, nobody was paying attention to the other hand.

  13. Some notes on the asbestos: Schools are subject comprehensive asbestos inspections. Non-friable asbestos containing materials (those that aren’t easily crumbled by hand pressure) that are found can be safely managed in-place under an Operations & Maintenance plan if it is in good condition.The materials have to be re-inspected periodically to ensure that the condition is still undamaged. Some examples of asbestos-containing materials often found in older schools are vinyl flooring, the mastic that holds the flooring to the subfloor, window caulking, roofing, ceiling tiles, and wall board to name a few. It is standard to do an AHERA survey prior to demolition of any building to determine proper disposal of any asbestos-containing materials. Asbestos can not be incinerated on-site. The posted signs may be left over from an asbestos abatement that was conducted in accordance with pre-demolition work.

  14. Didn’t Sandy Hook spend a lot of money supposedly for renovations before this event? I think I recall reading that somewhere. Thanks for sharing.

  15. So many good comments and insight here !! Please come and visit our page at where we continue to investigate and share information daily !!

  16. Brendan Hunt has provided some most excellent information about Sandy Hook. Check out his video about Gene Rosen on his Youtube channel xrayultra.

  17. Thank you for posting this video and the text. I greatly enjoyed all of the commentary thus far! This is such a bazaar situation. I still shake my head at the number of new residents in that neighborhood prior to the event. Over a weekend, I spent time checking on the names associated with the stories and their length of time supposedly living in that community…for a scary majority of the names – they lived in that town 24 months, on average. I find that very, very strange even for a supposed area that had been “revitalized”. If the town was so shaped up so, how could this school look like it had been abandoned for 7 years or so? We’re in the deep south and buildings can get ugly pretty quickly in the humidity – but the condition of this northeastern school and surround property – after such a short period of time – is curious.

  18. Wanted to also mention that Mr. Low’s tone to our filmmaker here sounds more like a person who has been on the receiving end of some intimidation (FBI? Local Police? NSA?) than a man who just simply doesn’t want to be bothered, does he not?

    1. In today’s Newtown Patch

      This is a rather well done documentary on the subject that I found.

      There can really be little doubt that there were multiple assailants. If there were legitimate reasons for these other subjects to be in the area then why are all of the relevant facts about them being concealed ? To my knowledge not a single identified individual has witnessed Lanza shooting a gun at the school or any where else for that matter. The “apparent” circumstances as we know them are very suspicious. Lanza was found dead at the school, his neighbor was caught running away and confronted on Crestwood ? Another individual fleeing with Lanza’s neighbor toward Crestwood escapes ? Armed SWAT guy caught in the woods? Neighbor that was caught apparently has a daughter in Roig’s class which was not attacked (unconfirmed)? School nurse identified shooter as kindergarten teachers son and goes into great detail that she knew his mother? Tony Aiello reports shooter was recognized as son of colleague ? CNN reports Federal Agents stated shooter was connected to school? No questions or concerns from anybody ?

      The Sally Cox 911 call will almost certainly corroborate exactly what happened but the call is being concealed by Sedensky for no legitimate purpose.

      Andrea McCarren and nurse Sally Cox refuse to clarify what transpired between her conversation. Why ? Did Andrea make all that up

      Tony Aiello’s report corroborates the shooter was the son on a teacher. 4:15 on this video

      Lt Vance avoids answering the question if the shooter’s mother is affiliated with the school:

      Keep in mind also points others have made are very valid that Lanza had no motive, no history of violence or anger outbursts and no verifiable history with firearms proficiency at all.

      I also find it suspect that Nance Lanza would go all the way to a gun store 70 miles away to buy a very common place gun available at most any gun store locally.

      These are fair fact based legitimate issues and questions please make intelligent responses and refrain from name calling.

      The children and other victims deserve answers. For the Children please.

      1. I initially did not think too much about Chris Manfredonia being involved but now I am convinced that he is in it up to his eyeballs.

        I read one report that asserted that he had a six year old daughter in Roig’s class. If that can be confirmed there is practically no doubt he was involved. 1. Roig’s classroom was the very first one in the hall and was not attacked despite that and that the door was unlocked. 2. If Manfredonia was not part of the shooting why didn’t he go to his daughters class or look in the window at least ? Instead, apparently, he was caught running away toward Crestwood ? And the guy he was running with escaped ? Why are the police refusing to disclose who was caught on Crestwood ? Manfredonia also lives only a few houses away from Lanza he may have known him personally.

        Motive: Gun confiscation- particular objective AR-15s and other semi auto guns.
        Method: Create a “Dunblane” incident to garner public support to ban assault rifles despite that all rifles of any magazine capacity comprise only 3 percent of gun homicides.

        I agree with Brenden Hunt’s theory that this was a professional hit.

        Fake death theories are intended to undermine credibility of the truth movement like the “no plane” theories for 911. Where was all the bloody pictures from VA Tech ? Aurora ? Come on get real. Real murders are easier and more effective. Why hasn’t one victim been identified alive yet ?

        1. Manfredonia is a real puzzle. A female sergeant at Newtown PD told a visiting couple that the guy pulled out of the woods was an “uncle who came to check on his niece.” Given that there are two Manfredonias within a few hundred feet of each other–and of the Lanzas–in Newtown, I always wondered if Woods Uncle was the other Mr. Manfredonia (Bob). That individual has a stepdaughter who was in “Adam” Lanza’s grade throughout most of their schooling in Newtown; and his wife works at the high school (along with another woman who’s husband has been missing since July, possibly related to the case). Lots of connections. As a sidenote, this Mr. M. turned himself in to Newtown PD the summer before the shootings on an outstanding arrest warrant for a fracas at the Newtown Youth Center. The warrant was issued in Jan; he turned himself in four months later–pretty lenient scheduling between him and PD, if you ask me. All of this could be unrelated; however, it’s not hard to construct a concept of two local gentlemen, friends of police, one or both of whom go crazy post-divorce after an escalating dispute with the school system. Statistically, that’s a strong possibility (spousal or family involvement), sadly, in any crime involving the deaths of children.

        2. Oh – and there are multiple reports of both the purple van or black Honda going to the high school first. I should have mentioned it’s Mr. M’s ex-wife, not current wife, who works at the high school. Early reports described only two occupants in the purple van, wearing clergy/nun outfits. This van may well have swung by the school, been spotted by high school students who were the ones to report it to police later, and then went to SHS. At least one report at SHS states the shooters were “let in because they were thought to be clergy.” A student in Roig’s class stated no one knew anything was happening until Roig’s windows shattered, indicating (if the Barth child’s recollection is correct) that shooters began shooting only after being let into the building. Incidentally, 24 hours before the first Sandy Hook search warrants were released, the Barth’s home burned to the ground along with all their family pets. If the Barth child is indeed a witness to the suspects we are considering in this thread, and is indeed a classmate of the Manfredonia child, that’s sort of chilling.

        3. I want to caveat all this, again, by saying that these could just be great people in a small town where things can easily be confused, given the small population, and natural abundance of connections. But it’s no stranger to consider this angle than to consider the Lanza angle. If I were in these guys’ position, I wouldn’t like being looked at, but I’d like to think I’d understand that the string of coincidences justifies it. Innocent until proven guilty, though, without question.

    1. Of all the people you could have compared him to, you compare him to that Koch owned right wing shill. That’s like an insult.

    2. I can’t reply to Mr. Bittman down below, but want to emphasize again that the median cost for an elementary school in CT, for Sandy Hook School’s population of approx. 450, is not $47 million as he stated, but $22.8 million. No offense, but $47M is simply not correct. If you take into account the Newtown Public Schools enrollment trends, it’s even less justified.

  19. Other than Sandy Hill was staged, it is difficult to say with certainty what actually happened. However it is understandable why Obama was so concerned to outlaw assault rifles. The homicide rate of the USA is much larger than it is in most other developed countries, but the gun homicides are mostly conducted with handguns, not assault riffles. The concern is for quite another reason.

    The plutocracy under Bush-Obama and the Terrorist war is creating an apartheid racist state, like apartheid Israel or the former South African state. This is occurring not only because non-Whites have more children than Whites, but because immigration is now conducted primarily from non-White countries, over a million a year the past decade.

    It is supported by the business community to keep down wages, as it always has been historically. Non-Whites can be paid less, and this lowers the wages that Whites must work for. What is happening in the next few decades is that a White plutocracy, 1%or so of the population, and a White professional-managerial class, another 10% or so, will rule a population increasingly non-White as the economic inequality deepens.

    Since change is not possible through Elections, which are rigged;in law, which is racist; or in the media which is corrupt, the danger is that elements of the non-White population will rebel, and unite with a section of the White population. This happens when people have less and less to lose, and America’s traditional plutocratic Democracy is already mostly a farce.

    So it’s necessary to disarm the American population, even to the point of creating Orwellian scenarios like Sandy Hook. Which may occur again in different form.

        1. Not really, Brendan. When you read Onion stuff, it sounds plausible, if insane (remember when the Chinese government believed that the Congress was going to build a new facility, complete with skyboxes?). Mark’s material could not pass that test.

          Fantastic effort here, by the way. Thanks for making this effort.

        2. Yeah–I think Onion is used to test the waters, to see what will pass as news. It’s an experiment on the public. I wouldn’t be surprised to find out where their funding comes from.

        3. I find nothing wrong with Mark’s comment. I thought it was quite intelligent. Oh, you guys must be the new crop of ultra-right “conspiracy theorists” who’ve popped up in the wake of these recent hoax shootings to point out the obvious truth so you can get credibility to herd people into your Tea Party “revolution”. The type that acts like this type of stuff just started under Obama and is being done to usher in white genocide and a nanny political correctness state. Your right, why would the predominantly, if not totally, white 1% want to oppress other races? Of course they want to destroy themselves. Yes, as a white man I’m so oppressed by blacks. They sure are getting uppity.

  20. James –

    II know you’re a busy guy, and I don’t know if you ever got my note, but I have a BIG question about signing in. Please e-mail me (either address) – or if you’d rather I could post my experience on this thread…


    1. Their plan is to INCENERATE the contents of the school and melt down the metal on site. It seems like a dangerous decision due to the asbestos risk. First the asbestos needs to be removed, then the supposed biological waste can be removed. Both of these things need to be done prior to demolition.

      1. My point to Newtown officials was that this seems like a case of adult overreaction and overcommemoration gone awry. They’re saying the site is so sensitive–so dangerously prone to evil sightseeing efforts–that they literally must post Blackwater-style armed guards 24/7. So they can…build a school there. Logic much? They’re flat out claiming the site is so dicey it has to be under armed guard even as a pile of dust; but in August 2016 the bouncers go home and everyone cheerfully drops of their 6 year olds? Honestly, at this point, Newtown officials, en masse, ought to receive no-confidence votes. I don’t mean that cruelly–it’s just quite clear they’ve lost perspective, at best, and fallen prey to corruption, at worst.

        1. Ah, but Brendan proved that the site was not only abandon, but not particularly fit for habitation at all. I was bummed he couldn’t get around to the front of the school. My assumption is that they did have a guard there.

          I firmly believe there was a shooting there, I simply want evidence to support my belief. There is no question in my mind the devastation that an AR-15 can cause. I own one (legally). The veil of secrecy ruins the Connecticut AG’s credibility in my eyes.

        2. Everyone who has to live in Sandy Hook now is in a horrible escapable never-never land where they have to pretend until the end of time that is thing happened. No amount of money would be worth that.

      2. Another thing that galled me today was Superintendent of Schools John Reed’s statement that Bestech (the company suddenly hand-picked by Gov. Malloy last week, skirting the bidding process) needs to 1) get cracking and 2) feel “thrilled with the attention” they’ll be receiving as the overworked yet grateful recipients of the contract. Reed’s words. For a town daily chastising Americans for simply asking questions, calling that “ghoulish,” they have some nerve slinging around suggestions that companies ought to be “thrilled” to achieve fame & fortune as the result of the worst mass-murder of schoolchildren in recent history.

  21. If asbestos is a major concern in the demolition, it was likely recognized before, and the children moved to another school. Sandy Hook 1 therefore being an empty stage prop for the mock drill. But this doesn’t necessarily mean that there was no shooting or killing. Nancy Lanza’s death certificate was filed, there were bullet holes in a car outside, there was a purple van traced to heroin addict gun nuts, there appears to have been a nun disguise. Both fraud and shooting were both possible.

    But a fundamental journalist question is not only HOW this scenario was planned, but WHY. It was an historical event in that the president of the USA identified himself with the official media narrative. Why would he go to such lengths and put himself in that situation to abolish assault rifles?

    This requires people to think historically and the commenters on this blog, who are very acute in analyzing specialized details, are adamant in evading general historical reasoning. The leftish are afraid to subvert the authorized truth consensus, and right generally put forth drivel. But this mock drill was planned under Obama, and possibly Bush, for many months, and American power obviously had something in mind.

    Americans tend to be afraid to think about it, or comment about it, like Mr Low. They are afraid of critical comments, or ultimately the FBI, and are silenced by being conceived Conspiracy Theorists or crazed paranoids. The media narrative are lies piled on lies and, perhaps most important, a media or learned silence of the most important aspects of the American historical process. A gangster police state is being installed in the USA to maintain and increase the monstrous economic inequality, and racism is being used to divide the American people, allowing the pluts to divide and rule. But the increasing class and racial inequality is out of bounds in the American media.

    But this can be corrected over historical time. All that it is necessary to do is to make people intellectually braver. That can be done by simply repeating the concepts and words stigmatized by the media, such as ‘socialism,’ ‘racism,’ or ‘conspiracy.’ The operative historical content relating to these words and concepts have been deposited down the memory hole, and it is not only the specific information that must be retrieved, but the entire discourse of past generations.

    If one can get Americans to agree that ‘single payee medical care’ is the same as ‘socialized medicine,’ and they are for it anyway, the cloud cover on their brains has been shoved back at least to that extent. The current infirm Affordable Medical Care has been dubbed ‘Obamacare’ by the corporate media to smear it implicitly with racism. This is very effective, since the Dems and left use the concepts and terms developed by the right.

    It will take some years to penetrate the Know-Nothingism, and to subvert the authorized Orwellian truth. One can start with empirical facts that even the most fearful and deluded can accept, such as that most homicides occur with handguns, not rifles. So why all the emphasis on rifles?

    But there also must be a breaking of the restricted American world-view, of forgetting the past and ignoring the future. This will be harder, since Americans are afraid of general ideological ideas that conflict with traditional American ideology. We are afraid of being called Communists, or Terrorists, or Conspiracy Theorists, or trolls for that matter. But there are worse things, and I fear that we are going to experience them.

    1. “If one can get Americans to agree that ‘single payee medical care’ is the same as ‘socialized medicine,’ and they are for it anyway, the cloud cover on their brains has been shoved back at least to that extent. The current infirm Affordable Medical Care has been dubbed ‘Obamacare’ by the corporate media to smear it implicitly with racism. This is very effective, since the Dems and left use the concepts and terms developed by the right.” (per Mark)

      Mark, with all due respect to your views, “Obamacare” was written by the corporate health insurance companies, of the insurance companies, for the insurance companies–unread by Congress and signed into law by our current President. Single payer medical insurance (such as the Medicare model) excludes corporate health insurers.

      1. (Continuing)…Jon Rappoport thinks it was designed to fail to further globalist policy to bring the US into compliance with their vision of a one-world economy, erasure of national borders, the institution of revolutionary changes after the instigated planetary fall. That sounds extreme unless you are up-to-speed on the back story.

        Don’t get trapped into the old left/right paradigm. Barack (aka Barry) is not an old-school socialist; he is a modern globalist. Neoliberalism is the kinder, gentler term for fascism. Former Labor Sec., Robert Reich, says this new health care program is the precusor of single payer. I rather doubt it will ever get to that stage of development. Astounding how many upper echelon dignitaries seem clueless.

        1. I want to concur with things both you and Mark have observed – that the public generally sees things in partisan and parochial terms, missing the entire globalization issue, some of which has obvious agendas. I recently took a class on British law and the European Union. It is clear that sovereignty of Britain has been on some issues been relinquished and the supremacy of the EU law enacted. Internally, this has an effect on the country. The US is not part of any such entity at the moment and many treaties remain on the drawing board, unsigned. But that those uppity colonists can be disarmed has got to be devoutly wished for in many circles of would-be rulers. The connection between such wishes (often verbalized privately) and something like an outrageous event at Sandy Hook is yet to be proven. Is global or is it local? Is it international or is it about internal problems which threaten those in national power? I cannot say that I know enough to decide what the source of the story might be. Clearly the Marathon bombing had a component which needed to play Russia against Chechens, in maybe a divide and rule strategy vis a vis the other Caspian basin players like Iran and the Stans. That seemed to have huge international implications, not the least of which is the Olympic-like quality of Boston’s run with its international super-stars of the running world, and the need to watch everybody with drones (which will be launched for it in 2014). At one time, it could have been seen as simply local, manipulating the US citizens. But with world wide events which mimic some of ours, it clearly provokes global comparisons – and solutions.

    2. The nuns did exist prior to 12/14. I found them on Newtown Bee’s web site in an article long before that date. The purple van was signifying one of the school colors. They are not FBI, CIA or illuminatia, to the best of my knowledge that was debunked.

    3. As someone who formerly worked in the Asbestos Abatement business and removal from schools, there are a couple of things I’d like to say. In many cases, the asbestos removed from school wasn’t even hazardous. Asbestos is known for it’s fire-proofing capabilities and used as insulation (very friable and dangerous), insulation on pipes (dangerous once the pipes get old and the fibers become airborne), flooring, ( a lot of schools had asbestos floor tiles but not really dangerous unless they were old and starting to fall apart and asbestos siding (again not dangerous unless the tiles are starting to fall apart.

      None the less, it was fashionable to remove all the asbestos out of schools in the late 1980s when I was working for a contractor to remove it or encapsulate it before it became a hazard.

      I’d be willing to bet there were several “bids” on removing the asbestos at this school long before this event ever happened and it was probably due to be either remodeled or demolished anyway.

      Since these are public buildings, there would be a public record probably with the State of Connecticut on this.

      1. Thanks bewisetoday about another possible paper trail existing before SHES event, which could offer a plausible explanation as to why that school was used. I felt at the outset that the sign outside in the parking lot, sometimes photographed as part of the shooting story (an irony appreciated by any videographers with an ounce of film-school training) – “Since 1956 – Visitors Welcome” – had to have been left up past its date of relevancy, just as the school parking lot had obsolete handicap spaces (wrong size, markings, color, as someone here pointed out).
        In an age in which strangers on elementary school campuses are definitely not welcome, it clearly was an artifact of the 70’s or early 80’s at the latest. It would have long since been changed on any current elementary school, as it is almost a come-on to passing traffic. But leaving it there (or putting back an old one) serves to dramatize a school taken by surprise, out of its presumed depths of privileged WASP naiveté (again, the Connecticut burbs ain’t what they were when that was a true characterization of their demographic).

  22. Evidence of asbestos on the set? What a sloppy production! And the circus goes on, even in the Rose Garden. It has just been confirmed that the Leader (aka Messiah and Savior) has supernatural powers and can sense that a woman standing behind him – without making any physical contact with him or saying a word – is about to faint. This is beyond pathetic! It seems there is no limit on how low these totalitarian clowns will go to further their destructive agenda. There is no reason to believe a single word this regime and its media utter. Have they had any credibility to begin with, they would have lost all of it long time ago.

      1. Thank you for the link Dr. Tracy. This whole industry of faux news with horrid actors would be funny if was not tragic, if it was not intended to make us all slaves of a marxist totalitarian regime. A pregnant? Obot faking a fainting spell to distract the public from Obama’s socialist healthcare disaster and to allow Obama to “save the day” – it does not get more nauseating and Orwellian than that. Propaganda ministries of Stalin et al would be proud. All people who participate in these hoaxes are sociopaths.

        1. Haha – yes, with regard to the whole fainting episode Obama “saw” in the back of his head before it was even close to happening — I watched a video montage of “faints” this morning and this is just tooooo much. Honestly, the fainting of people in the crowd and his responses are so canned and repeated that it clearly is like the canned and repeated statements he has made whenever he speaks in multiple locations. It’s so blatant, it just floors me…Obomba will do or say anything, I swear. He’s not even good at it….but the Obomites who worship this man, just don’t see it. Amazing.

    1. Ironically, over on Godlike Productions we suggested that instead of armed guards, the town should simply put up “DANGER: ASBESTOS” signs to ward off thrill-seekers. Lo and behold…

      But the school was said to have asbestos, regardless. I do wonder, though, whether that suggestion was taken to heart. They don’t really have much incentive to actually advertise the existence of asbestos, imo, unless they feel it helps avoid the greater problem of people sneaking in to film the school.

  23. A bit off subject here, but your last post (about the new book “the Dynamic Duo”) had no space for comments…. and I want to put in my 2 cents worth about it.
    Fetzer may be, in actuality, a great guy searching for the Truth about 9/11, but I remember him as being one of the most divisive elements in the nascent movement because he began going off on a tangent that there were no ‘actual’ planes, that it was thermonuclear devices… whatever… and created a split in the Movement between scientific researchers like Dr. Stephen Jones, and logicians like David Ray Griffin, who were attempting to give it all a sense of seriousness and gravitas.
    I lost all respect for him then. And, as far as I can say, some “whoop-dee-do” self promotion of being a ‘dynamic duo’ carries no weight.
    Not with me.

    1. Thank you for the comment. If the post promotes a video, book, etc., the opportunity to add comments is typically not provided. Most posts, however, do allow for such.

      This controversy has been discussed in the past on this blog, and perhaps from a somewhat one-sided perspective. A discussion by Fetzer on how he has seen his role in the 9/11 Truth movement is available here for consideration:

      1. I really appreciate how Fetzer founded the scholars together for 9/11 Truth – that said he then went off base to back Judy Wood when Bob Bowman who worked on Star Wars didn’t even agree with her. James, you’ve never had an article from any of the 2000 architects and engineers for 9/11 truth on your blog and for some reason only seem to feature people who follow Wood. Kindly, be more open minded and ask Crockett Grabe or other scientist to do a guest article for your blog.

        1. Thank you, Marzi…, for your comment, which I agree with wholeheartedly… and thank you, Professor Tracey, for your link to Fetzer’s article and many videos. It took me well over two hours to listen to all of them, which I did in order that I could feel I had a grasp of his “position” on this subject. All he said seemed well until he fell under the spell of Dr. Judy Wood.
          Here’s a key quote from him: as far as I am concerned: “Most of Steve’s fans, alas, do not understand that the adequacy of any theory about the destruction of the WTC can only demonstrate its superiority in comparison with alternative theories”.
          Now consider this from a ‘Scientific’ point of view: “…any theory about (fill in the blank) can only demonstrate its superiority (?) in comparison with alternative theories”… Well, I don’t believe that is a scientific requirement. A theory is postulated, and its relevance is measured by how well it fits the established FACTS. I have no idea that it must also address OTHER theories… except to “fit better” than they do to discovered facts.
          (as a side note here, my Hero in Controversial Science, Rupert Sheldrake, has questioned the very premises of modern Science using established FACTS and premises and provided fact- based theories in order to do so, without considering OTHER theories in order to do so. See: )
          Fetzer stated in one video that Building 7 was “obviously” a “controlled demolition” because there was substantial debris left in the aftermath… but the towers were “pulverized” into dust (which they were)… but gives no substantial, scientific reason why the pulverization would NOT have happened with Jones’ “Thermite/Thermate” “theory”. (I put the word ‘theory’ in quotes because Jones, and many others have physically determined that they ‘exist’ in the rubble dust.) More than can be said for Dr. Wood’s totally hypothetical Theories, which do NOT fulfill the requirement of fulfilling more, or all, of a premise.
          In the end, I can’t help but think that Fetzer had an Ego-based falling out with TRUE scientific inquirers, and he is struggling to regain credibility.
          The fact that “the Movement” dissed him is most likely well founded.

    2. Physics is way over my head, but it did occur to me two days after 9/11 (after the shock wore off; had a relative in Manhattan that day) that there were too many questions unaddressed.

      No planes? hollograms? Media sleight of hand? Nuclear-age explosives AND Star Wars technology from space employed simultateously to make sure nothing was left standing worth identifying. Someone had great fun that day producing and directing the action. The job of a lifetime. Small wonder as time passes, the films get nuttier and more easily reviewed with a critical eye. They are getting sloppy. Sooner or later, familiar names will pop up as the credits roll. Hollywood has a way of pushing the envelope too far.

  24. The fainting stunt in the garden is illuminating. Apparently Obama has included public relations stunts routinely in his repertoire. And they work! The bin Laden caper was initiated by a famous picture of him and his minions watching the firefight in Pakistan that didn’t occur. There were so many lies that unfolded in the telling that the security chief Brennen had to go on tv with a written list to tell the official story.

    Bin Laden, who was reliably reported dead for years, served as the Trotsky figure, Goldstein, in 1984. But Obama got a bump of ten points in the polls, and the fable may have won the election for him. The caper and the fainting fit in the garden makes an Orwellian caper like Sandy Hook more understandable and more believable.

    Marilyn, Obama isn’t a socialist of course, he was put in office by the plutocracy to do their bidding. But calling him a socialist and medical care Obamacare tends to de-legitimate the single payer medical care, for which Obamacare is a weak step forward. The pluts finance the Tea Party and the Repubs to shut down the government to stop it, because they are against ANY government medical system. It is labeled Obamacare to make it appear that it is directed primarily to non-Whites.

    1. Mark, of course language is a powerful tool in the ansenal of tyranny.

      Even in today’s high-tech environment, semantic devices still act as diversions because in the species, communcation is vital to survival.

      But don’t dwell on the propaganda ploys. Step back and see the global picture, as the elites do…in-fighting and internecine rivalries will do the job for them–eliminate hugh blocs of ‘useless eaters.’

  25. It never rains but it pours. So I see the story of the kid (Philip Chism) who stabbed a teacher to death in Danvers. Kid new to town, came from Tennessee, mixed race and apparently very successful soccer team member, goes missing. Teacher found dead in woods, she’s young too (24, while accused is a mature-looking 14). Then I see a picture of another kid, after the incident, who looks a lot like the killer. Name of the kid (who would usually be anonymous in such a shot – the adult isn’t named) is Christopher Veach. Out of curiosity, I go online to find this person too, to see if the picture was a mislabeled picture of Philip Chism. The first thing I see is a Find-a-Grave of a Christopher Veach who died the day he was born in 1998, so he would have been 15, which is close to the right age for the kid shown in the picture.

    Normally and in a sane world this would simply be a coincidence. But as we know, policies of all kinds are driven by violent events. Is this a policy-making event or not?

    Is there an agenda which will be easier to promote after this?

    Although the school seems to have had surveillance cameras, it seems that a killer was able to take a person outside (unless the blood wasn’t hers in that second floor bathroom) without any interference. Is that the message? There need to be guards at all times on campus? The surveillance seems to come after the fact.

    This may be simply a murder, but let me tell you, it is on the BBC, CNN, everywhere. It is the headline on CNN, and above the christening of Prince George at BBC. So something is up with this. Perhaps the interracial angle, perhaps not.

    I once again must reserve all credence for the news until something seems like a sad but normal crime once again.

    1. Any shooting which receives attention by the regime media can safely be presumed to be a politically motivated hoax. Remember that BBC is a fraud no different from America’s marxist media. Indeed, anything that the regime uses to boost its image and its political agenda are suspect, like the most recent incompetently staged “fainting” in the Rose Garden. The regime and its media have zero credibility.

      1. Although in most ways, the story of a student who kills a teacher who was trying to deal with his slacking off in class by drawing pictures, so that he could be prepared to take an exam, seems plausible, the way it is being responded to seems to draw from institutionalized catchphrases of the day. One elderly woman (a parent or grandparent?) who was quoted standing outside the school used that word I believe we first heard uttered about Sandy Hook and what one of the commenters wrote here: “Our children are RESILIENT, and they are going to get through this.” “Boston Strong and Resilient” you might say – and Colleen Ritzer, the slain teacher, had “Boston Strong” on her website. In the absence of economic prospects, is that what is left – while supposedly gruesome murders take place all around, the herd moves forward confident in their strength and resilience – yeah, right. Sure they are.

        If my kid went to that school, I wouldn’t sit still for the authorities to give me an explanation. I might just decide to walk in and snoop around to find out how the place could have been so deserted someone could have committed such a murder and disposed of the corpse without provoking comment – or even how the victim could have fallen without a sound. The more you think about it, if you do, the odder it seems (although as I say, plausible on the face of it).

        As with Tsarnaev, there will be a trial. Let’s see how that goes.

        1. The key word is resilient, whenever you see the killer killed, immediate and widespread MSM coverage, and the word “resilience” it’s code for FAKE FAKE FAKE

        2. In this case, the boy Chism is still alive. But I presume there will be a history of his life elsewhere which points to mental illness, although no such assertions have come to light yet. The family of the killer is not visible – his mother has written a letter saying how sorry she is, but she has not come forward. She is supposedly somewhat transient, but native to the Boston area after having lived in other places and taken Chism all over the place.

          Right now, the students are mourning the teacher and being bused to the funeral Mass. I guess this does not violate the church/state boundary. Having been officially Congregationalist up to the 1840’s, it is now 80% nominally Catholic.

Comments are closed.