New Studies Show Health Risks From Wireless Technology

brain-cancer-gliomaFrom the Bioinitiative Working Group

New Studies Show Health Risks from Wireless Tech: Warnings from the BioInitiative Working Group/
University at Albany, Rensselaer, New York /April 16, 2014

The BioInitiative Working Group says evidence for health risk from wireless tech is growing stronger and warrants immediate action.  The Group released a mid-year update covering new science studies from 2012 to 2014.

New studies intensify medical concerns about malignant brain tumors from cell phone use. “There is a consistent pattern of increased risk for glioma (a malignant brain tumor) and acoustic neuroma with use of mobile and cordless phones” says Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD at Orebro University, Sweden, according to studies released in 2012 and 2013. “Epidemiological evidence shows that radiofrequency should be classified as a known human carcinogen. The existing FCC/IEEE and ICNIRP public safety limits are not adequate to protect public health.”

The BioInitiative reports nervous system effects in 68% of studies on radiofrequency radiation (144 of 211 studies) in 2014.  This has increased from 63% in 2012 (93 of 150 studies) in 2012.   Studies of extremely-low frequency radiation are reported to cause nervous system effects in 90% of the 105 studies available in 2014.     Genetic effects (damage to DNA) from radiofrequency radiation is reported in 65% (74 of 114 studies); and 83% (49 of 59 studies) of extremely-low frequency studies.

Mobile wireless devices like phones and tablets are big sources of unnecessary biological stress to the mind and body that can chip away at resilience over time.  The Report warns against wireless in schools.   Schools should provide internet access without Wi-FI.

“It is essentially an unregulated experiment on childrens’ health and learning.

Microwave from wireless tech disrupts thinking – what could be worse for learning?  Technology can be used more safely with wired devices that do not produce these biologically-disruptive levels of microwave radiation” said Cindy Sage, Co-Editor of the BioInitiative Report.

Federal programs like ConnectED and E-Rate are calling for wireless classrooms while ignoring the health evidence.  Hyperactivity, concentration problems, anxiety, irritability, disorientation, distracted behavior, sleep disorders, and headaches are reported in clinical studies.

Government reviews on health impacts of wireless radiofrequency radiation from the European Union and Australia continue to be inconclusive largely because they require certainty before issuing warnings.   The FCC review of health impacts from wireless technologies is still underway, but has not affected the federal push for wireless classrooms.

David O. Carpenter, MD 

9 thoughts on “New Studies Show Health Risks From Wireless Technology”

  1. Over the last ten years, my wife and I have lost a score of friends (ages 37 to 70) to cancer. For us, these awful experiences clearly are trending. Seems like every quarter, we get word of someone else battling for their life.

    In the video, Johansson states that wireless telephony is “an invisible knife” that is altering everything alive, akin to having “poisonous snake(s)” unleashed throughout the planet.

    If there exists a direct relationship between the two paragraphs I just wrote, then my hope for humanity is ready to burst. No way will society stop our investing in and spreading of hands-free communication technology and platforms. No way.

  2. I respect peoples worries about this issue but I think one needs to consider other problems than the em radiation. Appart from phenomena such as nocebo, which I believe has a great potential for explaining seemingly pathological symptoms when the experimentally measured correllations with objective em are absent, one must also ascertain that it isnt something of a chemical nature emitted from electronic components when heated in correllation with the rf power level.
    Electronic components contain a wide spectrum of chemical substances and I dont think the full spectrum of potential culprits behind cancer seemingly correllating with use of mobile phones etc is known.
    If people get a cancer tumour on the cheek shaped like the mobile phone it doesnt mean it was the rf. It could be something unhealthy in the casing extracted with sweat and heat.
    Obviously researchers may have thought of that, but I havent seen any emphasis on clarifying that this has been exhaustively discussed. It would be interesting to clarify the chemical aspect.
    And mobile phones and computer keyboards are extremely dirty I ve been told. There could be any kind of unhealthy microbe or chemicals invading the device.
    Concerning the ‘knife’ of em radiation
    The human body is bathing both in long wave infrared emitted (55mW/cm2)and reabsorbed in every minute part of our bodies due to the unavoidable thermal emission. And near infrared and red sunlight penetrates the body and scatters everywhere inside the body.
    The intensity of that kind of radiation is probably more than 10mW/cm2
    A mobile phone may emit 1mW/cm2 and in any case less than the above mentioned sources.
    Other types of wireless equipment not being held close to the body produce much lower intensities.
    We must be warned from the example of scaremongering regarding CO2.
    It has cost the west enormous sums to no avail. I and many others before me have independently come to the same conclusion about climate scare. Its about preventing economic growth in China India Russia etc
    We must demand reliable answers on questions such as those above and not trust the scientists unless they have real proof.
    This could be just another wave of scare mongering using unreliable research.
    On the other hand if some people really are sensitive to the rf per se ie not the nocebo effect, but really something objectively measurable that would be something new.

  3. Dear old man–when we imagine that Nagasaki and Hiroshima happened only to some-one else ( rather than the end of peer approved science)– then we most likely will similarly never discover such as– tobacco without the chemical sprays– stopped many of the cancers the Japanese underwent.

    Nor might we take their scientific advice– “that there are far better things than tobacco that we might use” .

    We may readily follow how the Wi-Fi mind-set was allowed to prevail so persistently–

    if we compare the AMA takeover of Dr. Saxon Burr’s, the De La Ware’s and others EM research, with the AEC’s seizure and control of nuclear science and medical facts– in 1950.

    The Saxon Burr’s were showing that for plants, animals and humans– a cancer would only develop when a low overall electrical-threshold prevailed.

    This is exactly how tobacco etc (when combined with other demonstrated items) acts–they increase this thresh-hold above the established ‘damage must always occur’ EM (cum Wi-Fi) level.

    [even Samuel Epstein would suggest dont be hoodwinked by how things should act –by the accompanying clamor of ‘what is toxic’ –and then allowing our response to become another contributor to an entirely preventable grief].

    hope well

  4. We have a device made by a now defunct company called Healing Earth UK (someone else took the name and has nothing to do with the original inventor). It’s a powerful magnet with settings in a box that plugs in the wall and can change the magnetic field in the house to a healing frequency such as 7.83 hz. It works! Definitely helps counteract the effects of dirty electricity and WiFi. I suspect cellphones would still be negative but never use one.

  5. Denial is not a river in Egypt. Hopefully at some point one can awaken from the collective brainwashed stupor to the truth that our USA corporate gov.’s function is not to protect/care for us but to make a profit off of and control and eliminate us. Everything is or has been weaponized-the air we breathe, insects, the food we eat, the water we drink and the technology we’ve become dependent on. And TPTB are very effective at making these functions come to fruition.

    All you have to do is go to a website such as and select satellite&radar. I then go to the US satellite loop section and select either northeast or midatlantic satellite because I live in CT close to Long Island Nexrad. I prefer the visible satellite loop and check Radar and depending on the time of day watch the map light up.

    Please for a week check this site out especially late at night. Personally my body vibrates when the Nexrads (Tesla Tech) are turned on. I live in close proximity to several micowave/cell towers. Since there installation my health has become far from normal with the occurrence of an abundance of “autoimmune diseases”. I’ve slowly been detoxing heavy metals from my body and this seems to help my sensitivity, but I am the canary in the cold mine.

    What I have noticed is that a clear day, then heavy metal geoengineering aireosals dispersed by Nexrad activity.
    Also you can go to YouTube-(Ilove Youtube-I’ve learned so much) and the contributers measuring our silent EMFbombardment in the open
    and by cell phone

  6. I’m not trying to make fun of people making these comments,but for some reason I got a very stronge urge to dig up some old casette with Frank Zappa and soon found the passage to which my mind led me. Goes like so:
    -How do you get your, your water so dark?
    – Because I’m paranoid, I’m very paranoid. And the water in my washing machine turns dark out of sympathy.
    -am, sympathy, where can I get that?
    -At your local drug store.
    -How much?
    -Its from Kansas

  7. every good thing has some advantages also, and technology helping us also lot of medical equipment are operated on wi fi technology so we can’t say it;s that bad also

Comments are closed.