Constitutional Freedoms Under Attack

IRSFeds Pursue Soviet-Style Prosecution in Detroit


Doreen Hendrickson, wife of Pete Hendrickson, author of Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America has a court hearing set for December 10, 2014, 1:30 pm, 231 W. Lafayette, Detroit 48226, 2nd floor, Victoria Roberts presiding, for sentencing on a contempt of court charge.

This is a case of retaliation against Doreen’s husband for his book, which clearly defines the difference between taxable income and earnings that are not taxable under the IRS Code.  Though numerous attempts have been made to discredit and suppress the book, especially through deliberate misrepresentation of its contents by government officials, nothing actually revealed in the book has ever been disputed.

Not being able to dispute the veracity of the book, and having been forced to return billions of improperly-collected tax dollars to hundreds of thousands of readers over the eleven years Cracking the Code has been in print, the full weight and force of the IRS and the United States Justice Department have been leveled against the wife of the author. It might be noted here that even organized crime has a code of honor that they will do no harm to the wives and children of their adversaries.

Officially, Doreen is being punished for resisting orders written by a DOJ attorney and issued by a federal judge commanding her to replace her previous sworn statements in a legal dispute over whether or not she owed federal income taxes with sworn statements dictated by the government. The coerced statements would declare that she believes herself liable for the disputed amounts.

Although a government official signing such statements himself would serve as a claim to the money, none has been willing to do so. The total dollar figure involved in the case that would either remain with Mrs. Hendrickson or transfer to the United States is less than $1000.

This is not a Tax Case!

This case involves government orders that Doreen declare, under penalty of perjury, something she believes to be untrue. The contempt charge is for refusing to obey the order. This is a blatant disregard of her First Amendment right to free speech. Can the government, even through a judge, order anyone to say or admit to something not believed or proven to be true and then cite her for contempt for refusing to obey the order? The government says yes, but the First Amendment says no!

The federal prosecutors– specialists flown in from Washington– even had the audacity to ask (and were granted) that the jury be barred from considering the “unlawfulness or unconstitutionality” of the orders.

The jury was lied to by the DOJ prosecutors, while Doreen was prevented from completing her opening and closing arguments. Over and over again, throughout the trial, the US attorneys kept saying Doreen was only being ordered to “say what was correct”. Their Closing Argument was little more than pounding on the podium and shouting that Doreen was told what was correct by the judge, and so how could the jury imagine that she could honestly believe otherwise?!

The First and Fifth Amendment rights of all Americans are on the chopping block in the prosecution of Doreen Hendrickson, and the precedent it sets. What might YOU be ordered to say for the government’s convenience?

For a detailed overview of this ordeal visit

27 thoughts on “Constitutional Freedoms Under Attack”

  1. Great timing of this post!

    I am a big proponent of the *judicious* use of the tool commonly known as “jury nullification”. There’s a handy little pamphlet called “The Juror’s Handbook” that talks all about it.

    I’m still paying federal income tax, but I’m convinced that it is nothing more than an extortion racket: pay up or go to jail (and still pay up). It’s also a handy weapon to silence loudmouths, like in the case of creation-scientist, Kent Hovind (who is facing yet ANOTHER trumped-up criminal charge after completing nearly 8 years in federal prison for previous tax-related charges).

    Where does government (specifically, federal government) get the authority to levy taxes (specifically, income taxes), when no one can grant that power?

  2. Michigan seems the center of a slew of potentialities related to the Constitution. Perhaps coincidental in relation to this.

    First off–the capital, Lansing, is named after someone who never signed the constitution. –

    Next, consider Michigan attempted launch of constitutional convention in April (now forestalled, I believe)…

    Last report I know of on convention

    THen the U.N. got involved–

    Oh, and here’s the “Illuminutty” side (as Jim Carrey would put it)

    And, today, a power shut off (ok, I maybe am getting too random, ha)

    You know, those crazy overlords…

  3. Every illusion we thought existed is under attack because the government at EVERY LEVEL is infiltrated by corrupt frauds. No public record can be trusted. My work on Sandy Hook is making ID of straught up frauds with false identities just as it did in the Boston and Ebola BS.

    Frauds with false identities and fabricated credentials are testifying before Congress. Is it any wonder that the Judiciary at State and Federal level are so corrupt?

    We need to start demanding true validation of the identity of every single elected and public servant and those charged with hiring the staff below need the closest look. My research tells me that we cannot even trust that members of the US Congress, House and Senate, are who they claim to be!!!

    The odds are on the side of corruption. It is virtually impossible to find this many connected people who look just like the people in three government orchestrated events.

    In Washington an entire town is all frauds and it climbs to the county with the Elected County Sheriff presenting himself under a false identity and investigating this latest school shooting it turns out he is from Maryland and married to the fraud at the hospital who claims to be a doctor and is credentialed by the State. She is not a doctor and any medical person listening to her would know that no Medical Director of a hospital would be ignorant to the process for transfering pediatric trauma patients, and would be aware that a level one trauma center provides a higher level of care than a level two trauma center; she did not!

    Futher the federal clerk staff ALL need investigated and PROOF beyond fabricated public record that they are who they say they are and the same for every state institution of public service!!

    I kid you not people – my research is valid, the connections exist and the volume of frauds says WE HAVE A HUGE PROBLEM!!

    1. This was just e-mailed to me from an acquaintance in TX:

      The most corrupt administration ever!

      By Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
      I started investigating Loretta Lynch, Obama’s pick for Attorney General and immediately could see an interesting connection. I read an article stating that when Loretta Lynch started Harvard, she co-founded an African-American sorority. There was only one other girl in this sorority, Sharon Malone. The name rang a bell..
      The name of the wife of AG Holder is Sharon Malone, she is the sister of a known civil rights leader Vivien Malone -Jones (one of 2 black students who enrolled in all white University of Alabama).

      I checked the age: both were born in 1959 and both went to Harvard at the same time. There were very few African American students in Harvard in 1977-1981, so I am rather certain that Loretta Lynch is an old college friend of Sharon Malone, the wife of the current AG Eric Holder.

      Why this connection is important? Holder will be investigated by Congress for totally lawless gun trafficking to Mexican drug cartels in Fast and Furious, IRS scandal, VA scandal, DOJ, NSA, EPA, FEC and other scandals. Most importantly, Holder covered up Obama’s use of a stolen CT Social Security number of Harrison J. Bounel 042-68-4425 and Obama’s use of bogus IDs.

      It seems that a long time college friend of Holder’s wife was picked up as a gate keeper to continue all of the cover up by Holder and shield Holder and Obama from criminal prosecution.

  4. I demand to know: Where is the electronic harassment team? A simple microwave beam from outer space and old Doreen would change her tune pretty quick. I bet Myron is turning over in his money pit.

      1. ya that was silly. whats worse is I responded to fish, you and rich re: me being an infiltrator – it was the longest, most precisely written comment I’ve done outside of school (fully sourced) and on my last source footnote I accidentally clicked a link and lost the whole damn thing. ahhhhh the tragedy!!!
        so I leave you with this summary: i’m not a troll.

        as an aside, it was so well done it would have been perceived pretentious so I guess im glad I lost it.

    1. As I said before. I wish there was an open “free” blog running on this site to post anything that’s not related to the Topic such as this.

      Remember “Blue Boy” at Sandy Hook? No one ever tried to ID this guy. I’m guessing some kind of Federal alphabet soup agency.

      Checks this out. He “slides” in the Blue or Green scene at the fire house. He really does. 2 different videos.

      Video 1:

      Video 2 @ 1:54:

      1. No doubt that “waterboy” is inserted. That one guy walks FOREVER and makes no discernible progress toward him. The woman wailing immediately behind him illicit s no response. Good catch.

        At another site I used to post at we had dozens of examples of this. This was a major graphics exercise.

      2. Thanks Lophatt for responding. This was missed for 2 years and proves something that cant be denied. The 2 year anniversary is coming up and I hope someone jumps on it.

        I don’t have the programs to do it it like Random Shots and others. I really think or wish this blog would go back to Boston where we can really destroy their movie production.

        I know like 911 they just get away with it, but we must keep trying.

        I don’t know how to address all who work so hard at this except God Bless if even you are not a believer so not to offend the good people in this fight also. I hope that came out right?

      3. “I wish there was an open “free” blog running on this site to post anything that’s not related to the Topic such as this.”

        Me, too, Ric. So many good “finds” and new info often appear in an off-topic comment, and as new posts appear, comments to previous posts sometimes no longer get gotten back to. Independent Media Solidarity (the researchers who put out WNTTASH) have a forum section for researcher info exchange/discussion, but it’s not yet up and running.

        I found something kind of interesting re: Sandy Hook a while back but neglected to write down the URL. A woman’s photograph, on a Newtown website – which woman’s name name I googled (and wrote down at the time but now can’t find my notes) and found two other photos, one of which is with her husband, who is a dead-ringer for the medical examiner H. Wayne Carver. I would append the photos here but don’t know how to do so. The resemblance, however, is utterly remarkable. And the woman herself (in the photo that first caught my attention) was dressed in an attire that could be mistaken for a nun. It reminded me of the nuns seen at the SH event–black jacket, long dark skirt, that nun-looking head piece. Maybe another researcher can help me find out how to track a source with just a copied jpg image. That there could be a Newtown area facial look-a-like for the coroner, married to someone who dresses like a nun, had me wondering if maybe there’s a “There” there.

        Anyway, if not on JT’s MH blog. is there any trusted (troll-free) forum online where serious researchers can exchange info and new finds, etc.? Thanks for mentioning it. I, too, was wishing the same.

  5. Was surprised to see the video on AJ – We need to talk about Sandy Hook, when returning to the site to check out the comments, it was not visible on the home page but was able to search for it.

    Was getting frustrated as my browser kept hanging up, but kept going back as it was quite compelling.

    Kudos to our buddy Larry! Collaboration with all the researches may just pop this ugly eyesore of corruption.

    Their website, Independent Media Solidarity, has the production broken down into the amazing segments.

  6. Things like this are maddening. While this is certainly egregious, there are other examples of essentially the same thing. It doesn’t have to be a tax issue, although I disagree that it isn’t. It is the potential impact of defiance to the revenue system that is causing them to do this.

    We often say “we have rights”. On paper we do. When faced with a situation such as this one has to decide if they are prepared to suffer the consequences of asserting them.

    Put simply, they want a “confession”. If she doesn’t “confess” she will be jailed for contempt. If they simply found her “guilty” they wouldn’t need her acquiescence.

    It is easy to not be in her shoes and say “I wouldn’t sign anything”. That would be the “pure” thing to do. If anyone is familiar with Gordon Caul and his story this will sound familiar. He did the “pure” thing, went to prison and was later assassinated for it. They take their authority very seriously.

  7. Congress passes laws and exempts themselves(insider trading, obamacare). The President does pretty much anything he wants. Now The state can tell you how to answer questions in court, and the judge is cool with it. Cops shoot people dead and handcuff them. Seems like we are right on track to me. We are officially in three stooges land. Wake up and go to sleep. Hail Moronica!

  8. Here is the “further information” specifically, from PACER:

    Docket Text: TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: Sentencing Hearing on 12/10/2014 at 1:30 PM is Adjourned; new date to be set as to Doreen M. Hendrickson (CPin)
    Filed & Entered: 12/09/2014
    Notice of Attorney Appearance – Defendant
    Docket Text: NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Mark E. Cedrone appearing for Doreen M. Hendrickson (Cedrone, Mark)
    Filed & Entered: 12/08/2014
    Motion to Continue
    Docket Text: MOTION for a Continuance by Doreen M. Hendrickson. (SOso)

Comments are closed.