VA Reporter and Cameraman Shooting Discrepancy

Imagery allegedly circulated via social media of Vester Flanagan confronting WDBJ TV’s Alison Parker.

Video and photographic evidence suggests assailant in video is white, yet so-called shooter Vester Flanagan is black.

There appears to be a major contradiction in what has been presented as the official storyline of what has come to be known as the “TV Reporter, Cameraman Murdered Live on Air” story being pushed by mainstream and even some alternative news outlets.

Earlier today MHB‘s companion website Scoopfeed posted a video depicting the scene at left and analyzing the reported on-air shooting of a journalist and photographer. This video has since been deleted by YouTube staffers because of “shocking and disgusting [sic] content.”

MHB maintains that this video document is significant because it provides evidence contradicting the official narrative of the incident–specifically that the shooter was an African American male.

Here is Mr. Vester Flanagan at a sporting shop holding a handgun. Authorities have concluded that Flanagan carried out the murder of fellow broadcasters Alison Parker and Adam Ward. Yet is this the same right hand exhibited in the above screen shots or accompanying video purportedly trumpeted via social media by Flanagan?

The video below shows a key excerpt from the above referenced video where at about :38-:40 and :46 the clearly edited video evidences a caucasian hand and wrist of the would be assailant wielding the pistol before firing at reporter Alison Parker.

As SGT Report points out, “since the US government ended the ban on ‘domestic propaganda’, absolutely every “event” must be thoroughly examined and questioned.” Indeed, the fraudulent nature of what passes for journalism today is on par with that of major financial markets, healthcare, even our food supply, where caveat emptor should be the rule of all concerned citizens.

188 thoughts on “VA Reporter and Cameraman Shooting Discrepancy”

  1. One of the frames 25 seconds into this Bryce Williams road rage video shows a person wearing what appears to be the same shirt as the “white shooter” in the still image above. This person with the same blue shirt appears to be in a road rage confrontation with Bryce Williams:

    1. Looks like Bryce is wearing the blue plaid shirt. His encounter seems authentic and I think this fits the modus operandi of his confronting a gang stalker that targeted him.

      1. Is this video being presented as a road rage incident? What’s notable is the lack of any rage at all. Neither man seems mad (a little irritated, maybe), and it’s not clear what the beef even is about. And what does “Talk to the mirror” mean?

        1. I agree. The years of sexual and racial harassment of which he complained, and the total denial of any such thing by his employers and co-workers did it for me. These issues are not usually black and white.

        2. Bryce comments about the other guy being overweight and the guy then says, “talk to the mirror”, in other words you, Bryce, are the one who is overweight….

  2. This overly melo-dramatic scenario is loaded with false-flag red-flags. What struck me first was the seemingly deliberate attempt to associate this shooting with several other sensationalized massacres, in order to work them back into the headlines and public consciousness.

    Sandy Hook

    The names of the victims are Alison Parker and Adam Ward

    Alison – Allison Wyatt
    Parker – Emelie Parker
    Adam – Adam Lanza

    2, Virginia Tech

    Adam Ward is described a a graduate of Virginia Tech and is shown on CNN wearing a Virginia Tech sweatshirt.
    Adam posted a black arm band memorial to Virginia Tech on social media
    The shooting took place in Virginia.

    Charleston Shooting

    Perp with two made up sounding names (Bryce Williams and Vector Flanagan II) sends out a manifesto in which he lashes out against another shooter with a made u sounding name (Dylan Roof.)

    Columbine Shooting

    Poor black, gay, bi-racial Vector Flanagan suicides, but was briefly resurrected in order that his Twitter, Facebook and manifesto could be placed for public consumption. He pauses during the massive manhunt to post these, then once again conveniently expires. In his manifesto, he expresses admiration for the Columbine shooters.

    His black on white retaliation might have made him a social justice martyr, except the he never worked with Alison. Her Linkdin profile has her employed at the station for 1 year and 4 months. Flanagan was fired over two years ago.

    1. According to boyfriend, Allison met the shooter once during her internship at the station.

      Neither she nor her boyfriend look like anchor material to me; plus, they’re both quite young (he’s 2 years older than she, I believe). But an on-air position at 22 is pretty choice.

    2. Sandy,

      Let’s not forget the Batman theme running through so many of these events:

      Adam Ward (the photographer) ADAM West (Batman) Burt WARD (Robin)

    3. Seriously, I see these CIA/FBI moles high on pot laughing hysterically as they make up this crap It’s like they like to see how low the intelligence bar can go…..haven’t hit bottom yet.

  3. Why was the photographer aiming his camera over the balcony AWAY from interviewer and interviewee? How can none of these people hear or see him, he clomps all over the deck?

    1. I don’t know what the two women ( no offense) were discussing at the time, but their plausible explanation could be that he was filming the lake and marina showing what a nice place it was. He turned back to film them about three seconds before the first shot, or whatever. I wonder if they had him facing out to give more credence to their claim that nobody saw or heard him.

      1. It was a puff tourism piece and she was from the Chambers of Commerce.
        Better question to ask – why was this piece done “live” – these stories are usually taped pieces

        1. The “official” story (script) claimed it was airing “live”. Obviously if they were saying it was taped they never would have aired the video.
          My point was that this is not the type of stories TV typically brings you “live”. They usually tape these in advance.

    2. Because he knows, and is expecting the gunman.

      Notice he puts his gun down after he had already brandished it once and then waits until the cameraman swings over to Allison for the “Money Shot”. Pun Intended

      He botched his own 15-min of fame.

  4. The shooters shirt has white checks running through… another still photo of the ‘photographers camera {that was dropped tot the floor } shows a plain dk blue shirt.. the time of the live broadcast was stated on tv as 6.45 am…. the time on the shooters picture was 6.00…. if these anomalies persist, something is amiss.. My thoughts about the skin colour on the hand is not something I question… the light and photo of him looks like he is more olive brown than that of a at dark skin colour..

    1. I posted a video about the dad on Free Form.
      He’s also an actor and give lessons.
      He also got very angry when Kelly mentioned the still shot of shooter.

      Pure BS

    2. High strangeness.

      Notice that she drops the paper, but not the mike as she runs, with mortal wounds.

      The father and boyfriend’s manners are oddly unemotional, and the father is phoning the governor on the very day his daughter was shot on public television. (!)

      The boyfriend tweeting that they were officially a couple (taking time to upload a photo) within minutes of the time he got the news she was dead. ( because everyone does that.) and, BTW, is already soliciting donations on Twitter.

    3. Yes, he sounds SO distraught. Not even defiant. Like he loses a daughter about once a week, just because of that pesky 2nd Amendment. Does it take heartlessness to see through these pain-free parents? Or do we have to wait until his daughter is later beheaded by ISIS to call foul? How ’bout if she is shot teaching schoolgirls in Afghanistan? She could have more lives than a cat.

    1. Haha…crummy acting! Are you the DITRH guy? If so, I heard you on John B. Wells’ Caravan to Midnight show a while back.

    2. Thanks. Whoever put this up may be incorrect when they say “not a glance”. At :52 she, the reporter, turns her head to her right to look. At this time I am guessing he did not shoot when he first raised his gun is because the camera man had not yet turned to record the women. They had to wait and perhaps tell him to turn and the gunman had to wait before getting the OK.

      1. Big Tim, thanks, you are right at 17 seconds into AJs footage she glances partially in frame and backs the prep back to the starting blocks to get his “act together” … but even more damning then haha, she saw this guy looming, gun had to have been out, and she does nothing???!! Hysterical!

      2. Meant “prep” not prep …. also ur exactly right, Parker chased the gunman back to his mark bc the cameraman was dinking around and missed his cue

    1. I’m not on twitter, so I don’t understand how the time stamp works, or if it is ever off. Here is the link to the early tweet: I also saw another page where it appeared it was sent out at 3:30 am and everyone that responded was around that time as well: One thing I do know, is that if my loved one was just shot, I wouldn’t be mustering the time or energy to send out tweets. What a farce.

      The video with FOX was pretty terrible, and wholly unbelievable. Pushing an agenda immediately following the tragedy, just like the others. Here is RedSilverJ

  5. YT video by peekay22 was also axed due to disgusting whatever etc.
    The section of the above posted video showing the “shooters” video is a bit poor quality compared to other versions, but you can still barely make out at 0:37 the reporter turning her head to her right to look toward the “gunman”. See YT channel “The Black Child”

    1. has the shooter’s video still up, at least as of a few minutes ago, if anyone wants to see it.

    2. Maybe it’s a Kevlar vest for knees…you know how these madmen are, they like to shoot people in the kneecaps………. 🙂

  6. Does anyone really believe they would use a white hand? If you are doing a false flag you would use the right color hand! Look at other pics he’s not that dark.

    The REAL issues are:
    1. Why was he allowed on “set” near the live broadcast? An ex-employee who was escorted out, fired, etc. is allowed to walk up on a live broadcast. Don’t be fooled into thinking it’s just a reporter and a cameraman out there. It isn’t.

    How did he know where they were broadcasting? He was fired in 2013.

      1. And why would they be shooting this particular story at 6:00 AM? Is it even light at that particular place at that time of day? The shooters camera said 6:00 AM, the reaction from the blonde news actor (oops…did I mean anchor?)….was at 6:45 am? Apparently sunrise is around 6:30 AM. Really?

  7. In the Infowars footage (that shill/jew AJ says Williams did it, LMFAO) Williams walks down narrow deck right at the women, esp. the old bat liar, and neither even looks at him!

    He’s 6’3 250 black dude at 6:45 AM–no one else is around…

    But I gets better, folks!

    Then the BIG GUY backs away for a second & then moves in within 5′ of the women and points gun; then he backs away again to ‘summon courage,’ and comes back at them app. 10 seconds later, shoots about 5 times amidst bad theater screaming (Adam Lanza doesn’t try to tackle the Big Guy)!

    –and even better still, for a deranged psycho bent on recording his act, he stops filming, battery problem? (or least of course we aren’t allowed to see the downing) and we are left to surmise he shot the daughter of a acting coach who works for a big time entertainment Jew, Rick Zhan!!

    yep, “only in America” as Don King used to cackle!!

    1. “that shill/jew AJ says Williams did it”

      Don’t talk like that. Regardless if your one of those the “Jews” did it clueless people.

      It is so much more complicated than that. Study who these people are and you will lose the one sided, whatever I’m done

  8. Regardless of the obvious fakery in this event, I’m not convinced that the shooter’s hand is not black.

    Here’s a video of news story footage that Vester Flanagan as “Bryce” made with the Roanoke television station.

    At 20 seconds in you can see his hand holding the mike, pretty much like the shooter with the gun. It doesn’t look black.

    I don’t think this means the event was real, just that I wouldn’t stake the case on it.

    1. The point of this excercise is to see how many people will swallow the racial theme and also to see how many people’s opinions are swayed to believe this a conspiracy based on some basic trickery. The first shot appears to be white. It is probably photoshopped or even a real caucasian. The rest is clearly a dark skinned males hand. The trickery lies in the initial presentation, where people spend less time evaluating the first frame than the rest. First impression may conclude the hand is white throughout the shots, then once this so called fallacy is believed, the reader will almost always be more suggestible to any theory that contradicts the official (now interpreted as false) narrative.

      I believe excercises like this at mhb (as well as many other sites) are the primary focus of concern, as well as probable funding.

    2. Here is what Dr. Stuart Bramhall, who was one of the first professional writers to examine the “going postal” phenomenon, had to say about it in a comment on her blog:

      “The media coverage here is extremely misleading. There is no way that a high functioning TV reporter “gradually descends into madness” – true mental illness presents quite differently. This seems to have been a classic case of work place harassment, despite the court findings. It appears that co-workers were warned not to sympathize or affiliate with Flanagan – which is classic in all the cases of workplace harassment I worked with. And there is no question he would have been black listed after leaving his job at the news station.”

      1. Looks like this station also has other ethical problems.

        “Earlier this year WDBJ-7 journalist Orlando Salinas was let go from his position with Channel 7 news. According to the Roanoke Times, WDBJ7 offered no information about that decision at the time.

        Salinas is now going public with the details. In a public statement, Salinas described his investigation into allegations made about well-known local lawyer Daniel L. Crandall and WDBJ’s attempt to stop his investigation. Salinas says he was told “Orly, you will NOT contact Mr. Crandall. You will NOT contact the prosecutor. You will NOT contact the police.” by his former bosses.

        wdbj7 bIt is widely known in local media that Crandall and his law firm is a huge advertising account to have. Salinas explained the business relationship large advertisers like Crandall have with media like WDBJ Saying, “A ‘pillar account’ is a tag given to an advertiser that spends a large amount of money on ‘media buys’ at various local ‪news‬ agencies including my former employer. Pillar accounts routinely spend large amounts of cash on advertising, benefiting the receiving agencies. That’s how business works. ‘Big money’ buys big commercial air time over and over and over again. Critics say those ‘big dog’ accounts have been known at times to sway or delay appropriate news coverage that might otherwise thrust the advertiser into a public relations tailspin. As a result, that advertiser may choose to end their relationship with the reporting news agency and adversely affect that news outlets bottom line.”

        On Wednesday, August 26th, we will carry an exclusive live interview with Salinas on Fox Radio 910 at 8:am. Salinas is expected to detail the events surrounding his departure from WDBJ7, the alleged cover-up and the evidence he says alleges ” years of sexual, physical, emotional and financial abuse” of at least two females by Crandall.”

        1. Thanks for the link MM59. This should be a major story as it goes to the heart of the integrity and trustworthiness of the employer. This should be being reported by all the major news stations and blogs covering this event.

        2. true, but all major news stations do the same thing – bow to advertisers over the truth.
          We entered the twilight zone decades ago, sad to say.

        3. they do not “bow to advertisers” , ALL MEDIA OUTLETS ( literally the entire media- news papers- television ) ARE OWNED BY THE CFR -counsel of foreign relations / united nations/NWO – all TV is scripted / it is called ‘programming’ for a reason, every single “news” station is SCRIPTED , those are NOT “news journalists” they are actors , this is the narcissistic generation, those people dont care what they read to the public from their telepromter as long as their hair,make up and finger nails look perfect . the CFR OWNS ALL MEDIA OUTLETS & everything is scripted on TV – they are paid to read telepromters

  9. I’m starting a Class Action Lawsuit against the federal Government for force feeding us cheap, poorly produced, ridiculously terribly scripted low budget Snuff Movies.

    We have spent almost a Trillion dollars funding these false flags.

  10. No blood , not knocked down by the 45 caliber, runs away in her heels,,,the tv station video shows the cameraman shot first,,, the father and boyfriend have no tear duct swelling in interviews hours after,,,the gun has no recoil as if he had mason forearms,,,no shells……boyfriend posted on twitter 15 minutes earlier about his loss than the time stamp on tv station broadcast,,,,

    And Paris hoax quickie

  11. I want to know about this only what all good Americans would want to/seek to know. If I were a cool kid what would I think? If only I were on Facebook/Twitter, what would I think? If only I truly existed, what would I think? If only…

  12. Let’s think this through. He walks up, the camera man is looking over the balcony. She is sticking the mike at the woman’s face so, presumably she’s doing the interview but he isn’t filming. If not, who is?

    He walks right up next the camera guy and he doesn’t even glance in his direction. Neither do the reporter or the interviewee.

    He shoots five times. No blood, no sign of exit wounds. She doesn’t even flinch. She runs off.

    What is camera guy doing while this is happening? Is he just standing there? Is he running away? What?

    Supposedly he shot both of them as well. Did they sort of stand there and wait their turns?

    How did he leave? Did he walk? Did he run? Did no one try to stop him?

    These things fall into different categories. There is the “real” event that gets spun by the MSM for government-supplied agendas.

    There are the “engineered ones” that can be fully or partially scripted. They are spun the same way.

    Then there are the drills.

    There are subsets of each of these. What they all share in common is that they are not truthful depictions of actual events. Just like when a “madman” shoots someone they don’t ask “who supplied the madman?”.

    Just based on the surface of this, these must have been the most relaxed unaware people ever. A pterodactyl could have swooped down and carried them away and they wouldn’t have batted an eye.

    So, he films this whole thing and he never looks around to see if anyone’s coming to stop him? I would imagine that someone doing this would have fired a couple of those rounds at the camera guy and the other woman just to make sure they didn’t try to interfere.

    If he had such a grudge against her wouldn’t she recognize him? Does anyone really think that you wouldn’t glance at someone in your peripheral field who was making motions like he did?

    How would he know that she was going to be in Southwestern Virginia doing this interview if he no longer worked at the station?

    Who knows? It sure looks suspicious to me.

    1. These considerations of shaky evidence are very important. If you were a (good) fiction writer you would have to flesh them out for your astute readers who would drop the book if you did not satisfy some basic credible criteria.

      But the medium of “news” is different, isn’t it? Everyone listening to the news these days seems to suspend disbelief even more readily than they do when they experience what they know from the start is fiction. News is like the new religion. You just don’t start asking too many questions. You trust and believe – you trust and do not verify. Any sort of work you might want to add to the situation must accept the premise that what was told to you was true. Then you may critique it, but only to get more clarity on the basic story, to learn about for instance the psychological background of the perp, and to help the authorities to flesh it out. Never to reject out of hand what you have been told.

      Already this news is very big at BBC, I notice. Solemn voices intone their disgust at yet another shooting in the former colonies. When oh when will America become civilized and stop presenting the world with such a display of barbarism? How long until they fall into line with the rest of the Commonwealth/E.U.?

      But as we can see, the official news has a very low threshold to meet before it is parroted everywhere, and the lies pass as easy counterfeit currency, referred to even in updated fashion.

      Today I heard the Tsarnaev family compared on public radio in Boston with some real disgruntled family after the real Armenian genocide by the Turks. Imagine if you will a nonfiction writer on the radio in Boston whose family experienced this major event, documented in countless sources, being asked to compare his own family with the Tsarnaev’s — because it is true that the Armenians have historically taken revenge against the Turks from time to time, even in Boston. I don’t know what he made of this. Not only is the lie used to get some policy change, it is also injected into the historical record like false papers put into a file in the hopes of being incorporated into the historical record – think the song “Old Shoe” slipped into the Library of Congress in the film “Wag the Dog.” One is to associate disgruntled Chechens with local disgruntled Armenians (and perhaps try to “understand” them, now that the Russians are becoming our enemies again).

      Of course, perhaps there is a story there – a hint that some quid pro quo happened because the shoot-out sequence with the Tsarnaev’s actually was filmed in a heavily Armenian refugee community (or at least it was after the century ago genocide), which is Watertown, over the Cambridge line. Kind of a coincidence of comparisons, and really in very bad taste. I have no idea what sort of history is being sculpted by this or for what reason.

      1. Musings, yes, IF you were “good”. I think a major component is the modeling aspect. We are “expected” to “believe” the MSM. Those who do not are “crazy”.

        Your point about the BBC is interesting. Without prior planning it isn’t easy to coordinate memes. It can be done, but it takes time.

        It also takes time to find facts on alleged perpetrators and to locate stray footage in support of the story. I could have gone on for quite some time pointing out the other anomalies. They are rife.

        When we compare this with real events and how those played out it becomes even more suspicious. As usual, they are not interested in facts, they are interested in “characters” or representations of fearful events that are useful to them.

        As you said, when writing a story we strive to be believable. We think it through and try to fill any holes in the logic. We want characters to behave normally and believably.

        Without any elaboration the sheer volume of these episodes would be suspicious. We know they are pushing both the gun confiscation and mental health agendas. They have shown no reticence to date to hype their goals in the most alarming ways.

        These “news” stories are designed to leave vague impressions, not detailed information. The act of asking questions clearly disturbs them.

        The logical conclusion here is that two camps will form. One will totally disbelieve anything they say. The other will pat their collective selves on the back for their “loyalty”. These are total appeals to emotion and reptilian level thinking.

        I don’t know about you but I’m getting tired of them.

      2. Thats funny you mention that , did you know that Watertown is one of the only towns to throw out the ADL, they have a large Armenian community and the ADL was pressuring them to stop recognizing the
        Armenian genocide by the young turks, domneh jews
        here is a video of a Watertown town meeting discussing severing ties with the ADL prior to the “bombing” and subsequent “police raid” in Watertown

  13. No blood , not knocked down by the 45 caliber, runs away in her heels,,,the tv station video shows the cameraman shot first,,, the father and boyfriend have no tear duct swelling in interviews hours after,,,the gun has no recoil as if he had mason forearms,,,no shells……boyfriend posted on twitter 15 minutes earlier than the time stamp on tv station broadcast of his loss,,,,,

    And Paris hoax quickie

    1. The lack of blood is beyond telling. I’ve seen real footage of people being shot and our blood pumps, it isn’t still, so blood spurting is almost immediate from a gunshot wound. It’s also odd that the woman being interviewed actually turns her body towards the shooter and then seems to stand there or maybe fall. She doesn’t just look, she goes towards him bodily.

      What do people think the purpose of a wig and shawl found in the shooter’s car is?

      1. I wondered about the French train event. Every one of these false flag scenarios has a big hero or two.

        I love the dancing ladies clip…I wish I had their energy! 🙂

  14. Please scroll down to the last paragraph from the NYPD:

    He claims that the shooter was a ‘rational planner’ but simultaneously hid the signs of ‘mental illness’ that ‘some others could see.’ The police and inquisitors aka psychiatrists have super human powers, apparently; they can ‘see what others can’t.’ Again, they push this theme of rational concrete and organized thinking that is at the same time ‘mentally ill.’ No such animal exists. The state would have us believe ‘irregular behavior’ and ‘hostility’ and ‘multiple firings’ are all signs of some organic disease only the anointed commissars can divine.

    1. Rational planning and mental illness can coexist. I’ve had a lot of experience with BI-Polar individuals and they can rationally explain, in detail, any delusion they cling too. To a point where they may even convince people of them.

      1. Sorry, but there simply isn’t a biological disease ‘bipolar.’ There is an organic (meaning genetic) disease called manic depression. The two have nothing whatsoever to do with each other. So when you say a ‘bipolar’ person can rationally explain some ‘delusion,’ that’s because their ‘delusion’ isn’t a function of a mental illness. It isn’t true psychosis, which, like manic depression, was redefined in the 90’s to mean something different from its real character. True psychosis involves material delusions and sometimes hallucinations, usually auditory as opposed to visual. Thinking you’re god or a prophet or some famous dead person would be psychosis; thinking you have a right to something or someone that you don’t can be called a delusion but it’s not the psychotic kind. It’s just plain life. In extremes, it’s a function of character and power, not of biology.

        So when you call someone bipolar that means absolutely nothing. True manic depressives will evince true psychosis when manic, and it’s completely separate from their life issues and power struggles with people – that’s why it’s called a brain disease instead of a power trip.

        1. And, the minute true mania begins the person undergoing it loses rationality. They do things without any reason or rationale whatsoever. They experience heightened energy and elatedness (NOT anger), and are usually having psychosis within a couple days or sooner, most often material delusions.

          No one can rationalize their psychosis, precisely because it’s psychotic and inherently inexplicable. No one can explain how they’re actually Thomas Jefferson, or god.

          Pat wants to somehow conflate power dynamics with psychosis. As a rule, if someone has power issues with specific people or group, it is absolutely NOT going to be a function of psychosis. They may be wrong or somehow unjustified but that’s a character and emotional issue.

          It’s pathetic that americans aren’t ashamed and embarrassed to try to conflate power issues with psychosis. You may not like someone’s assertions, but that doesn’t make them ‘mentally ill.’

  15. Allison appears to be an amputee. Must check out those photos tweeted by her completely heartbroken and bereaved ‘boyfriend’.

    1. I’m only finding one photo so I must be missing something. What is in these photos that lead you to think she is an amputee?

    1. they , the TV producers of this garbage – seem to being doing more & more obvious BS just to see what they can get away with, like the X’s in the sky & flying 5 jets side by side while they are spraying the crap out of us with toxic chemicals , it all seems to be a sick joke on us while the 97% percentile of TV brain washed idiots they are making complete FOOLS out of with this blatant nonsense , i mean the people who make this shit up and do the producing & acting must be rolling on the floor at the extent of human stupid that actually believes it .

    1. The time on the black suit frame is 6:00 am. This frame does not even appear in the footage of the cameraman. It is extracted from some other source….

        1. I couldn’t help but notice that in virtually every picture in the DM article, Parker’s wearing red. Doesn’t red symbolize initiation in the occult?

      1. I just can’t believe how “In your face” it is the exact camera that “fell” to the ground has a time stamp of 6 am and 2 sec before while on Parker that same camera has a time stamp of 6:am.

        It’s on display in every MSM article or tv show and no one questions it.

        Also re-watch the interview with Parker’s dad and fiance.

        one, when the dad tries to fake cry the fiance laughs in his face on nation television. crickets

        two, when anchor Kelly brings up the still shot of shooter (with fake time stamp) they both flip out as to say shut up and don’t bring attention to that picture.

        third, the father says his daughter is a “Fox” girl when she in fact works for an CBS affiliate.

Comments are closed.