Book Review: And Nobody Died in Boston Either (2016)

State-sponsored terrorism with Hollywood special effects (9/10)

Edited by James Fetzer, PhD, and Mike Paleck
Reviewed by Brian R. Wright

[Note: The Coffee Coaster is proud to publish this review on April 15, 2016—241 years after the British were ordered to march on Lexington and Concord, Mass., thus leading to, on April 19th, the first colonial armed resistance that produced British casualties: the ‘shot heard ’round the world’ and the beginning of American Independence. [And, ironically, the third Boston+front+coveranniversary of a major hoax-assault produced, in Boston, by an out-of-control, clandestine, federalized oligarchy for purposes of destroying all vestiges of individual liberty in our country.]

The good news is this book, unlike the notorious Nobody Died at Sandy Hook (2015), was not ‘banned'[1] by Amazon. The bad news is that with the Boston stage performance, many in the alternative community—which initially was all over the false-flag indicators and images in real time that completely demolished the official story—seemed to stop writing and caring a month later. Was it because the two alleged terrorists had hard-to-spell names and a Muslim orientation? Did the government’s case miraculously start making sense? Or did higher priority stories come along, e.g. what ‘the Donald’ ate for breakfast yesterday morning?

In any case, both Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the ‘Brothers Chechen,’ became the ‘it’ victims of the ultimate synthetic-terror tag game—this one apparently designed to groom American TV-Nation booboisie for martial law and 24/7 law enforcement pounding-slash-photo ops. “USA, USA, USA!” greeted the rampaging goons… large numbers of them, too… 9,000 men, armed and dangerous, sources report. “Sleep safe tonight, America, your steroid-amped, federalized, militarized police are here to throw you and your family out in the street.”

The federal Boston bombing drill 4/15/13 is more a collage of imagery than the Sandy Hook event, which happened [five months] earlier, 12/14/12. We also have a timeline, and various camera footages, including mainstream media and surveillance videos; it’s hard to keep it all straight. What I was looking for was something like 10 easy reasons why the Boston Bombing was a false flag, and the best aid was actually from Craig McKee’s chapter (3) where he lays out the official story under the following headings:

*The police bomb drill exercise
*The identification (of the Tsarnaev brothers as suspects)
*The pursuit
*The ‘confession’
*The connections of the suspects (to Intelligence)
*The ‘carnage’
*The grooming for martial law

Then as he’s laying out the official sequences of events under each heading, McKee asks pointed questions as to whether any given official fact passes the smell test. Few do. [Many such factoids are withdrawn by the authorities, then submitted again, then withdrawn, as if proceeding from a random number generator.] Indeed, like Sandy Hoax, virtually nothing about the official story of the Boston Bombing makes any sense —EXCEPT as a very poorly executed federally sponsored terror drill, using crisis (bad) actors, while serving the objective of advancing a total police state in America.

To cite one example under ‘The pursuit:’

“Why would the brothers drive to MIT, then kill a cop to get his gun (when they already had one) and then not take (MIT police officer) Sean Collier’s gun? Why would they then proceed to carjack the SUV of Danny Meng when they already had a vehicle, THEN each of the brothers drive one of the two vehicles they now had, before abandoning the vehicle they had originally? Why continue to drive Danny’s SUV when its theft would be reported to police. Why confess their crimes to Danny then let Danny go or let him escape so that Danny can run on to the police and convey their confession? And why remain in the Boston area for three days if they were actually guilty?”

The book presents literally dozens more absurdities. It’s just a story that would never happen the way we’re told unless it were made up. The book adduces reasonable evidence and/or absolute proof that:

1.The backpack with the explosives was black; the backpack carried by Dzhokhar was white; the case against him should have been dismissed on that obvious ‘black vs. white’ fact alone.

2. We know that government intelligence was in contact with both men for several years, also with members of their families; this jibes with other false flag operations, like 9/11, where suspects were long monitored by Intelligence.

3. Audio of the Boston Bombing includes Boston law enforcement officials (LEOs) blaring from a bullhorn, “This is a bomb drill, do not be alarmed.” Tweets by those other than the Tsarnaev brothers announced that explosions were scheduled to go off… as part of a drill or some other controlled explosion.

4. FBI special agent Richard DesLauriers—in response the wide Internet dispersal of photos of Craft International (government contractor-spook company) men on the scene carrying around and depositing (black) back packs—stated, “These (official FBI) images should be the only ones, and I emphasize the only ones, that the public should view…”

5. All police statements about the alleged gunfight with the two brothers, the killing of Tamerlan, the apprehension of Dzhokhar in the boat, the alleged confession Dzhokhar wrote on the curved inside surface of the boat (in darkness), the handcuffed naked man, etc., are so fantastic and riddled with contradictions they must be rejected out of hand.

6. An eyewitness claims the police ran over Tamerlan in the SUV, not Dzhokhar; Infowars asserts the brothers were trying to surrender to police, that they fired no weapons of any kind.

7. The official story of Dzhokhar escaping from police and running over Tamerlan with the SUV to get away makes no sense: 1st, how would Dzhokhar manage to get away and, 2d, why would he deliberately run over his brother in any case, much less take the time to do so as he is trying to escape from the police?

8. Judy Clarke, Dzhokhar’s famous defense attorney, greets the jury by stating that her client is guilty! She did not cross examine most of the prosecution’s 92 witnesses and only called four of her own. Clearly, she—along with the federalized LEOs, judges, prosecutors, jury members, and media—were scripted to suppress any evidence that might undermine the official story.

9. The ‘Miracle Man’—his name is Jeff Bauman according the official story, but some have alleged (and, for one, does not challenge) that his real name is Nick Vogt, a US Army Veteran who lost his legs in action in Afghanistan before taking a leading crisis-actor role in the Bombing production—is scooted off on a wheelchair by Hollywood hero-moron, Carlos Arrendondo. With both legs blown off below the knees, and a loosely applied tourniquet to only one leg, why do we see no blood… anywhere? How is it Miracle Man is not screaming, or unconscious, or dead? Why did hero Carlos stick him on a wheelchair, anyway, with the torso raised to facilitate more blood loss? Where was Miracle Man carted off to?

10. You’ll really appreciate the Commentary section of Allan William Powell’s chapter (5), where he does a simple listing of one flagrant contradiction after another—it’s actually comical how poorly the Bombing stage show was cobbled together. One notable farce: large numbers of ‘victims’ experience swaths of ripped clothing, particularly pants, with no shrapnel damage whatsoever to the body parts beneath the clothing. Two special bombs, eh?

If you’re a viewer of all these incongruities and you still buy the official story, then, I’m sorry, your days on earth as a functioning human being capable of independent survival (even in the Idiocracy America has become) are numbered. And it’s a small number.

To expand on what’s noted above as rationale for the Boston incident not receiving as much alternative media exposure, I find that editor James Fetzer hits the nail on the head: a big component of the globalist mind-control agenda for the previous decade or two is to scapegoat Muslims. He supplies a list, in case we’ve forgotten:

1. “9/11 was blamed on Muslims
2. The Boston Bombing was blamed on Muslims.
3. Charlie Hebdo was blamed on Muslims
4. The Paris Attacks were blamed on Muslims.
5. San Bernardino was blamed on Muslims
6. ISIS is supposed to created by bad Muslims.
7. Iran is supposed to be run by bad Muslims.
8. Muslim hordes are invading Europe.

All of which lead to the inescapable conclusions that:

9. “Muslims are bad, therefore,
10. Keep them out of the United States [per Don Trump, anyway].

“For those who know no better, I have done enough research with enough collaborators to be convinced that none of the above—with the possible exception of (8)—is true….

“The one that bothers me the most may be (7), because all 16 US intel agencies concluded in 2007 that Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons, a finding they reaffirmed in 2011. Even the Mossad reported to the Israeli government the same, just three weeks before Benjamin Netanyahu went to the UN to affirm the opposite. Our sanctions [vs. Iran] violate Article 33 of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as forms of collective punishment, which properly qualify as war crimes. The Iranians are not ‘the bad guys.’ That honor falls to the government of the United States.”

And Nobody is a compendium of several writers, and each of them has a unique story to tell, some more adroitly than others. [I have quibbles with some copyediting lapses and overall layout—as I expressed for the similarly configured Sandy Hook book—but they pale to insignificance compared to the courage and vital information conveyed herein.] The analyses uniformly draw the reader into a world where reason and logic are important; it’s even entertaining in places. It’s a hard book to put down; it’s a worthy demolition of the official story and you won’t be disappointed. I applaud Dr. Fetzer and all the writers for another superb contribution to the Gandhian global truth force, Satyagraha. Thank you very much, again, for raising the torch.

If, like Sandy Hoax, the Boston Bombing was not a federally funded simulation drill to serve a control agenda, then where were the emergency vehicles? Not a single ambulance showed up on Boylston street, didn’t they have directions? Why were no death certificates produced? Why did we see no blood gushing from the many newly created amputees? Why was fake blood poured on the concrete? Why did hospital officials deny requests for records of admissions?

The reasons government officials commit such hoaxes (and real killings/injuries) is because the people have no effective tools to prevent them from committing crimes. Or rather we do have the tool—the fully empowered people’s First Principles grand jury—but we’ve let it atrophy from disuse.

The restoration of the grand jury—which would simply launch a people’s investigation into and indictments of legitimate suspects for any gross official misconduct… such as false flag crimes, official deception, crisis-actor fraud and complicity in a felony conspiracy, etc.—must be Americans’ highest priority in law today. Especially for Sandy Hook and Boston. [Note: I have envisioned how the resurrection can occur in my recent novel, The Truman Prophecy. For access to preview versions, please go to the home page of the Worldwide Society of Independents:]

[1] Technically, a banned book means the coercive state has forcibly prevented anyone from publishing or reading it. What Amazon et al have done is refuse to publish Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, which, strictly speaking, is different from banning. [Though, you can make an argument that Amazon is such a dominant catalog that not to be listed therein is tantamount to being prevented from publishing… an effective ban.]

SPECIAL NOTE: Upon hearing from one of the authors, let me rephrase the above footnote. It does appear that Amazon has gone to great lengths to deny the existence of or access to the Sandy Hoax book. To the degree that in the modern world of publishing amounts to a BAN. Here are Prof. Harwood’s comments on the lengths Amazon is taking to prevent any readership or discussion of Sandy Hook or Boston:

“Amazon has not just refused to publish the book but has also apparently banned any secondary seller from selling the book on its site. Similarly, when I ordered the book from a secondary seller on eBay, the order was suddenly canceled and my money refunded. I ordered from a seller in Australia for about $90 with the postage. The book is not listed on eBay to this day. Who [but coercive state agencies (‘Intelligence’)—ed.] could lean on Amazon and eBay enough to ban all secondary sellers even though obviously both Amazon and eBay would make a profit from selling the book?…

“And another thing… the censorship or ban extends from the Sandy Hook book to the Boston book in that no book reviews of the Boston book are being posted on its page. I posted a 5-star review of our book and it was unceremoniously removed without any explanation or notice to me or on the page for the Boston book. Try posting a review of the Boston book on the Amazon link and see for yourself what happens.”

[Note: To check out Professor Harwood’s claim, I, Brian Wright, the author of this book review, have just submitted and had a five-star review approved on the Boston book Amazon page. I’ll keep you posted if my review should be cancelled in the next few days. (It is certainly odd that until my review was posted, the page indicated no reviews… since January 2016?) — bw]

Needless to state, the authors would prefer you buy And Nobody Died in Boston Either from their Moonrock books site here.

31 thoughts on “Book Review: And Nobody Died in Boston Either (2016)”

  1. One thing that is never discussed when it comes to the Tamarlan is the fact he was married into the Russell family (Roussels) are well known as bloodline families. Taze Russell was instrumental in creating the seventh dad adventists and the mormons.

    The fact that a daughter of this family was married to one of the supposed bombers is a pretty big deal to simply neglect. Yeah they said perhaps they didn’t know him as well as they thought. Yeah sure. They probably called her up and said hey are you mixed up in this? She said no and they said oh then you are innocent then and hung up.

    Then uncle Ruslan is a CIA agent who denounced his nephew for being radical. Yeah that is the ticket.

  2. Sandy Hook was four months before Boston “bombing”- article says a year and a third. Uh, no. Iran is not the good guys. This kind of sentiment wrecks the truth movement. They sever nail polished fingers there, they bury and stone women to death. Russell connection: yes, interesting. Rosalind Russell’s cousin’s daughter, graduated from high school with me in Ct. Plus, does anyone have a copy of the communication from Russia regarding warning of the FBI patsies the Tsarnaev brothers? Also, the mom of the brothers: do people think the CIA caused her to drop the pursuit of her son’s innocence? I recall the Infowars reporter speaking to her.

    1. ???? Really Maureen !
      “The federal Boston bombing drill 4/15/13 is more a collage of imagery than the Sandy Hook event, which happened [five months] earlier, 12/14/12. ”

      And domestic violence and Femicide is rampant in all the Gulf states. And is everyone bloody related to someone from Boston ? You’re on the wrong blogsite sweetheart; if Infowars is one of your sources of propaganda.

  3. Dachsie submits this comment at 9:35 Central Time, Monday, April 18, 2016. My comments frequent moderation limbo land of late.

    “I find that editor James Fetzer hits the nail on the head: a big component of the globalist mind-control agenda for the previous decade or two is to scapegoat Muslims. He supplies a list, in case we’ve forgotten:”

    What if the Muslims that are set and set up before us and what everything is blamed on are not Muslims at all but more crisis actors hired by the Mossad? Just askin’.

    Suggest CHANGE…
    “The federal Boston bombing drill 4/15/13 is more a collage of imagery than the Sandy Hook event, which happened a year and a third earlier, 12/14/12.”

    “The federal Boston bombing drill 4/15/13 is more a collage of imagery than the Sandy Hook event, which happened FOUR MONTHS earlier, 12/14/12.”

    Dachsie comments… Connections between Sandy Hook and Boston events remain largely unexplored. The two events are very proximate in time and physical space and are under the same directorship.

    In the book, on pages 214 through 217, the testimony of
    Maret Tsarnaev is covered.
    It appears that Dr. Fetzer accepts as valid and true the testimony of this aunt of the Tsarnaev brothers.
    See here for example…

    Dachsie comments….

    I have much difficulty in accepting ANY PART of the Boston “Bombing” as being valid and true, and that includes the testimony of the “aunt.”

    This article asks many important questions.

    I am pleased and proud to own both Nobody Died books. They are an important contribution to truth.

  4. The Marathon bombing was a much more obvious hoax that Sandy Hook. We saw no bodies or injured at Sandy Hook, but in the marathon fakery we saw the allegedly “injured,” and nobody in their right mind can believe those obviously fake injuries and blood were real.

    There must be hundreds of trauma doctors and nurses all over the world who recognize this fakery but are afraid to speak out, knowing full well what would happen to their careers. This is one of the ways people are silenced in 21st century America.

    The Jeff Baumann story is so far-fetched and his injuries so fake, even a low-budget B-movie studio would reject that ridiculous script. However, Baumann is not Nick Vogt, and that is fairly obvious. I don’t know why people continue to claim this.

    The media reports of what happened on April 15, 2013 do not in any way mesh with the photographic evidence. The problem is that sheep don’t look at the evidence, they just listen to their masters in the media and government.

    1. “There must be hundreds of trauma doctors and nurses all over the world who recognize this fakery but are afraid to speak out, knowing full well what would happen to their careers. This is one of the ways people are silenced in 21st century America.”

      Yes, this being made afraid to speak out for fear of losing their jobs is indeed one of the ways people are silenced.

      But that is different than all of the hospital administrators and M.D.s who actively participated in the movie. I collected about one hundred articles of that nature. As stated before the Spaulding Rehabilitation hospitals and clinics of which there are several in the greater Boston area heavily participated in the hoax. If the Spaulding company is still making sporting equipment, now made in China probably, think twice about purchasing.

      The official story afterwards said their were 16 amputees. I searched around and found 14 possible people to fill the 16 but of course there is never anything official to verify against.

      Just remember, each false flag is a vicious, violent, terrorist, gut punch against each of we the people.

      1. Spalding makes sports equipment, Spaulding is something else you refer to.

        You make an excellent point. Collaborative doctors and other personnel that “supported” the Marathon farce are certainly complicit in nefarious fashion. Do they have Obama administered pardons for their participation?

        We are being keelhauled and rules are being broken by the authorities left and right. How many people have been threatened in numbers of ways to preclude their blabbing?

        1. “Do they have Obama administered pardons for their participation?”

          There are degrees of participation. Some just know they know some important truth about the event but decide it wisest for them just to keep quiet about it. And the other extreme of participation is to actively plan and act to carry out the event which is false and evil in intent. And there are all levels of participation in between.

          It all is sort of a silent unspoken quiet form of extortion. We all learn about very early on in our adult lives – school, work, play. Our particular personality type will give us each a tendency to deal with this lifelong problem each in a unique way.

          There are whistleblowers who go to the FBI or other top levels of federal agencies and are stonewalled at every turn and if they are dogged and tenacious, they will find reprisals in their careers. They may be blacklisted from employment anywhere or moved to a meaningless job in the basement — payback comes in many flavors.

          For the journalism career and matters of free speech, there is a book titled Into the Buzzsaw that chronicles what happened in the way of reprisals to some talented top journalists who tried to find and write truth.

          It all traces back to the breakdown of society that inevitably ensues when the society is Godless.

        2. Oh, you can rest assured they received a lot more than that. Everybody and his cousin in Newtown got their mortgage paid off in full!

        1. Here are a few of my old Spaulding Hospital / Boston Bombing links. Spaulding is a teaching hospital associated with the august Harvard Medical School. Are we disgusted yet?

          Here is one of many quotes referencing 16 people sustained traumatic leg amputations in the Boston Bombing..

          “Doctors fought to save as much limb as possible, but in half of the 18 amputations, on 16 people, patients lost the use of their knees.”

          “In this week’s PEOPLE cover story, featuring candid interviews and an exclusive photo portfolio taken on May 30 at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital in Charlestown, Mass., Haslet and 10 other survivors – including nine amputees – reveal how they’ve been coping since the April 15 blasts that claimed three lives and left as many as 264 people injured. ”

          This was the cover story for the People Magazine. Note that amputee Mery Daniel shows LEFT leg amputated above the knee.

          Here is an interesting MHB comment that relates how all the first photos of Daniel show that it is her RIGHT leg that appears injured. Her LEFT leg is covered in undamaged clothing and appears uninjured.

          Christo commented on The Boston Marathon Bombing’s Inflated Injury Tallies.
          in response to dachsielady:

          This stuff is either hilarious or grossly insulting. I am not a person who would laugh at a person who has lost a limb, but they have prostituted theirselves to lie to we the people and possibly rake in big bucks.

          Partial list — amputee crisis actors of the event who claimed treatment at a Spaulding facility…

          Roseann Sdoia
          Heather Abbot
          Celeste Corcoran – one of two amputee crisis actors claiming both legs amputated at the Boston Bombin.

          approximately 23 locations in Boston area

          Survivors Credit Spaulding With Recovery – CBS Boston

          Roseann Sdoia can be a tough critic, she’s in building management and development, but from the moment she was wheeled into Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, she knew the place was different.

          Here is one of the crisis actor M.D.s associated with Spaulding…

          “At Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Dr. David Crandell, who has treated many of the amputees, said that controlling expectations has been especially challenging with the Marathon bombing victims.
          Celeste Corcoran.”

          Here’s another M.D. crisis actor…

          “It sounds grotesque, but if you could imagine, it’s like putting your leg into a garbage disposal,” said William Creevy, an orthopedic surgeon at Boston Medical Center, which treated five amputees.

          Alleged Donations collected by amputee crisis actors

          “Amputees are contemplating more-accessible homes and pricey prostheses. They have raised money themselves and have benefited from the One Fund, established by Boston’s mayor and the Massachusetts governor with private donations, which paid them $1.2 million or $2.2 million each, depending on whether they lost one leg or two.”

        2. Thanks for all the names, Dachsielady. The gold-digging reminds me of all the cops at Sandy Hook who were seen eating pizza on-camera, but then found themselves so traumatized that they were all paid off in early retirement. (or so I read)

        3. I just want this to sink in a bit more with the readers.
          I identified two, but there are more, medical doctors who participated in this evil big lie.

          Dr. David Crandell M.D., Boston Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital


          Dr. William Creevy, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon at Boston Medical Center

          Both are M.D.s who heavily participated in this treasonous, treacherous deception of we the people.

          I have several photographs of this amputee crisis actors in a big physical therapy room of what is probably one of the Spaulding facilities as there is obvious sophisticated medical equipment in the room. There are medically dress people posing in whites in these photos and they may be more paid actors. (It would be a shame if Spaulding made their real physical therapists to show their faces as actors in these farce photographs.)

          Spaulding and Crandell are directly associated with Harvard Medical School.

          Does this build up the trust and respect of we the people toward doctors and hospitals? Not!

        4. At an absolute minimum, this makes a ghastly mockery of folks who have had to have real limbs amputated! If I were one, it would piss me off something fierce.

    2. The guy being pushed in the wheel chair with one leg by the cowboy hat wearing good samaritan, is what did it for me. B/B was the worst!

    3. Paul, I’m linking the current home of the Boston Bombing photos here, which you obviously have seen, but maybe others haven’t

      Boston Bombing photos taken from an office overlooking where the crisis actors waited their turn for the photographer. Two did not even lie down until the photographer was ready for them, at which time one “became dead.” We actually see one woman put on her “blood makeup.” We see Cowboy Hat, lounging & waiting for the final event. Looked at carefully these are conclusive proof that the Boston Marathon bombing was a hoax. Brassard Family Mother, father, grown daughter wait for the second smoke wave to move to the Candy store where Dad pretends a serious leg injury. At one point the daughter begins to run; the black woman on the stretcher beside her reportedly had a leg amputated, looks fine. Then the lying interviews.

  5. What is Scribd URL for this. First time I’ve see this. Is Maret Tsarnaev being played by someone?

  6. Media Broadcasting Center Official Channel

    Go there right now for full coverage live by Dr. Fetzer

  7. Excellent work! I have been researching, Inc. as well as eBay and particularly appreciate Dr. Harwood’s point. Thank you to all involved!


  8. One further thought… I wonder if Zbigniew Brzezinski’s odd reference to the historical Tamerlane in The Grand Chessboard (1997) has any sinister relation to the brother with the analogous name. I know it’s a stretch. Just a thought…


  9. Reblogged this on The PPJ Gazette and commented:

    If you’re a viewer of all these incongruities and you still buy the official story, then, I’m sorry, your days on earth as a functioning human being capable of independent survival (even in the Idiocracy America has become) are numbered. And it’s a small number.

  10. If one were to look at the absurd scenario of the BMB in every detail, you could see it is something like a law school hypothetical you might get on an exam, in which you are to identify which government agencies might claim jurisdiction in the case.

    It’s not about plausibility, it is about how many agencies could credibly claim an interest in the events. The meaningless death of Sean Collier, the MIT security guard, with his interest in further police work in the area, would draw in all the local cops, who would see this as personal. The entire MIT community would also be drawn in.

    Then, the kidnapping of Danny Meng would draw in the FBI, while the bombing at the Marathon would invoke the bureau of ATF. Once you see the vast picture of who is officially involved, it means that the plot of the story was tailor-made to cast the net as wide as possible.

Comments are closed.