Clinton Emails Via Wikileaks Further Detail Candidate’s Felonious Actions

Hillary directed staffers to “remove classified header of a classified document”

A Link to Michael Hastings’ Death?

MHB Commenter “Sue”


In an interview with ITV’s Robert Peston, the Wikileaks founder (Julian Assange) said, “We published an email where Hillary Clinton is instructing her staff to remove the classified header of a classified document and send it by non-classified fax.” That would be a felony for anyone else.

[At 5:38 below.-Ed.]|baghdad|basra|mosoul&mfrom=&mto=&title=&notitle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=&noto=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult

These Hillary e-mails are amazing, and I need to start taking notes. Joe Wilson, the United States Ambassador to Gabon sent her a message in which he apologizes for sending it directly to her rather than going through Sidney Blumenthal: ” I am taking the liberty of sending this directly to you rather than through Sid because it is of immediate import and is outside Sid’s area of expertise.”

Her friend, Sid sent her the full text of the Rolling Stone piece on General McChrystal by Michael Hastings, which had them very concerned. Hastings is of course dead as a result of a single-vehicle accident involving a tree. Blumenthal, who at minimum represents a conflict of interest due to his business dealings in the Middle East, suggests in other e-mails that she broadcast out using her influencers and media friendlies. (I thought they all were!)

One journalist, who had written a piece on the State Department’s handling of Benghazi, sounded terrified. His article was critical of her Benghazi decision. He sent her a fawning e-mail, pledging undying support, with no daylight between their views. Perhaps he was afraid of trees.

25 thoughts on “Clinton Emails Via Wikileaks Further Detail Candidate’s Felonious Actions”

      1. Chicago is riddled with tunnels inside the Loop. You can almost completely avoid the screaming frigid winter winds and still get around town on foot.

    1. You’d think that after 50 some-odd years of practice (or more) at altering photographs (Oswald holding the famous Mannlicher-Carcano comes to mind) those who are tasked with this deceit would do a better job of it. So, the fact that they do sloppy work and present it to us,is part of their mockery for the base & unenlightened masses.

  1. The State Department re-opened their email/server case against Killary Clingon after the grilling they received from Congress.

    Don’t hold your breath…..

    Hillary: ” I did not have email relations with that Server.”

    It all depends on what you mean by is, is….

  2. You know, everybody’s rightly screaming for this nasty bitch’s blood for illegally and arrogantly mishandling secret documents, but if she had posted them all on for all to see in the interest of disclosure and transparency in government, many people would be calling her a hero. And yet that would have been an equal (or worse) felony. Maybe it’s the actual secrecy that is the cause of all the trouble, no?

    1. I think the email is a limited hangout. The criminal Clinton Foundation is the real problem. One look at who was sold what would drive a stake through both of them.

      If you ever wanted to know what it looks like when two psychopaths marry, this is it. Actually placing her where she’s at must give them fits of laughter every day. Those two would steal the fillings out of your teeth.

      1. Found a criminal mafia gang and you could be arrested found a foundation and the money flows in and you are a charity hero who can milk every scam going . Tony Blair knew this – its the way now.

        Could you imagine the Al Capone foundation ?

        I would trust Capone sooner than the Clintons .

      2. Agree with Lophatt. The Clintons have a broad portfolio of crime techniques being used constantly. They are famous for their support of arms dealing, that’s the source of much of their money. Email abuses are notable and speak to adjudication and jailing, but what you don’t see is clearly vastly more pervasive. These are people who’d gladly cut your liver out and sell it with a bag of onions. Vicious, nasty people training their half spawn Chelsea, of course.

        1. Gil, I see that. Just because I don’t elaborate on my perceptions regarding these………..people, doesn’t mean that I’m unaware. Personally, I wouldn’t want to be in the same room with either one of them.

          Politics are full of such people. They are notable for their extreme and reckless behavior. They have access to a vast fortune but are compelled to increase it, even at their risk.

          They are public examples of psychopathy in action. She’s like a thief who gets caught red-handed with the open safe and, while the cameras roll, she boosts somebody’s wallet.

          They can’t help themselves. It’s funny to me how nobody ever goes after the ruling elite of these political parties for running these aberrations. I know its all fake, but you’d think somebody would ask the question. “With 300 million people available, is THIS the best you can do?”.

        2. Ann Barnhardt does a good you tube video on “demonic narcissism ”
          – the good thing is she goes over examples on how to spot them using real live ones . Its her last video she reckons as she has covered most points .

    2. Another enlightened soul posted and it belongs here, my how time flies!
      If you’re under 50 you really need to read this. If you’re over 50, you lived through it, so share it with those under 50. Amazing to me how much I had forgotten!

      When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over health care reform. Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn’t even get a vote in a democratic controlled congress. This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.

      Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two selections were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration. Next she chose Janet Reno. Husband, Bill, described her selection as “my worst mistake.” Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.

      Husband, Bill, allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her selection. When a little probing led to the discovery of Ms. Guanier’s radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.

      Apparently a slow learner, husband, Bill, allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations. She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury Department. Her selections went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.

      Many younger voters will have no knowledge of “Travelgate.” Hillary wanted to award unfettered travel contracts to Clinton friend Harry Thompson – and the White House Travel Office refused to comply. She managed to have them reported to the FBI and fired. This ruined their reputations, cost them their jobs, and caused a thirty-six month investigation. Only one employee, Billy Dale was charged with a crime, and that of the enormous crime of mixing personal and White House funds. A jury acquitted him of any crime in less than two hours.

      Still not convinced of her ineptness, Hillary was allowed to recommend a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of Director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of course, denied knowledge of drug use in the White House.

      Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.

      Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the scandal defense. Some of her more notable decisions in the debacle were:

      She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms. Jones.

      She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor.

      After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr’s investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs.

      Hillary’s game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practice law for ‘lying under oath’ to a grand jury and then his subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.

      Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice during the Starr investigation by repeating, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” a total of 56 times while under oath.

      After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that she had stolen.

      Now we are exposed to the destruction of possibly incriminating emails while Hillary was Secretary of State and the “pay to play” schemes of the Clinton Foundation – we have no idea what shoe will fall next.
      But to her loyal fans (supporters) – I guess in her own words “what difference does it make?” I guess being a female Democrat is all that matters. By the way, I’d post the same if she were a Republican. You see, she’s already been in the White House, she has a record we can review.
      Hillary for prison 2016 would be a good start to help make America safe again!!! – check the facts.
      William Valcarenghi · Loyola University Maryland

  3. And they say Trump is the business expert. Hillary’s emails reveal her unrelenting bargaining skills. Ah, the Clinton Foundation…It looks as though Bill and Hillary won’t have to think twice about ordering extra cheese on thier Big Macs.

    “From 2009 up to 2013, the year the Ukrainian crisis erupted, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, which is headquartered in the Ukrainian capital of Kiev, a new report claims.

    The Clinton Foundation’s donor list includes some 200,000 names, among them foreign financial institutions and Wall Street-based financial organizations, international energy conglomerates and governments, the government of Qatar included, which allegedly has given between $1 million and $5 million in donations to the Clintons.”

  4. According to Andrew Kreig’s interview here on MemoryHole in 2014, Benghazi was about arms running (think Sandinistas under Reagan, Ollie North and Poindexter, et. al.)

    1. Yes. And think of all the possible outcomes for various entities that can be purchased through a simple “contribution” to a fund. All quite “coincidental” of course.

      Arms and drugs are not their only business, but they are a substantial part of it.

      1. Yes and probably extorting for good weather for outdoor events and retaliation for challenges in the court. Poor Texas has had many 500 year floods this year and CA? So sorry they sold the land long ago and forgot to give you your eviction notice!

Comments subject to moderation